For every terroristic activities ISIS would always claim it's theirs, why with this high profile undertakings no claim was made on their side so far? quite confusing.
Yes, by presidential order. That is the reason why ambassador Stevens and three others were killed in Benghazi. Obama created all Nusra and Daesh. He trained, funded and supplied them with weapons from Libya.
All I asked for was proof that the US is arming terrorists. And I am still waiting! And just so you know the rebel opposition or "extremists" are not terrorists. Perhaps if you looked up the definition of terrorist! And just so you know the actual history the Republicans were strong supporters of arming the Syrian opposition. http://www.reuters.com/article/us-iraq-crisis-congress-vote-idUSKBN0HD2P820140919
1) Al Qaeda/Al Nusra and ISIS are terrorist groups.... 2) You completely ignore the 3 US senators saying that we are arming terrorists 3) You completely ignore the fact that the rebels are unified by their extremist militant Strict Sharia ideology (which is terrorist in nature) Then you say "there is no proof". What kind of proof would you like ? Last ... I am fully aware that the republican establishment supported arming the Syrian opposition. Is this some partisan bias denial thing for you ?
Rotten Ronnie was ... Rotten. Supporting death squad dictators in El Salvador and Guatemala. They even trained the death squad troops how to terrorize civilians at the "School of the America's" Supporting Saddam while using Poison Gas against his own people ... vetoing the "Prevention of Genocide Act". Supporting Suharto while committing genocide against East Timor. The difference this time is that none of the previous had recently attacked the US and/or were designated number 1 enemies of the US. Arming and supporting groups like Al Qaeda/ISIS is a much bigger deal from a public opinion perspective.
We are now supplying manpads to 'moderate Rebels' again. Last time we did that they started showing up in Iraq against our own troops.
Perhaps CourtJester should be parachuted into Mosul with the last weapons shipment to ISIS as Obama leaves office?
He is having trouble coming to grip with the idea that the State Department/Pentagon and so on have been lying their faces off "Moderate rebel lie". Folks want to live in the happy fantasy that "we are only a force for good". Information that contradicts this "necessary illusion" is very upsetting to many.
That's a giant misnomer, liberals have been using confusing language to attempt to create a more positive image of their new pets, Muslims. The radical Muslims aren't the one blowing things up, those are the moderates, the radical Muslims are the ones that speak out against it...
what the actual f##K? Mate, The USA was funding the IRA when i was a kid and that was flipping ages ago!
Clearly FAITH is at the core of the problem: w/out a court-room level of evidence the Jihadists believe they will avoid some magical after-life torture by killing for Mohammad's invisible friend in the sky, etc. If they had faith in science and humanity then this problem would be solved. - - - Updated - - - Let's condemn Obama AND Mohammad, ok? I condemn Obama and Mohammad.
Yes, and it doesn't take a genius to join the dots from the CIA overthrow of Mossadegh in 1952 to the rise of fundamentalist Islamist terrorism today. But of course that's something we mustn't discuss... - - - Updated - - - How about condemning US foreign policy and the lust for global hegemony at any cost?
Turns out Obama's main policy in the ME was to allow the rise of ISIS and arm them to overthrow Assad. To fly in the ointment was the entrance of Russia screwing Obama's plan. No wonder Obama is throwing out anti-Russian propaganda.
