US willing to go it alone against Syria if needed

WHAT THE BROADCAST MEDIA ISN'T TELLING YOU

1. War in Syria was started by Obama ... (like Reagans secret war in Nicaragua)

2. The chemical weapons claims about Assad are fabricated.

3. The Obama Admin. wanted this war all along, caused mass atrocities,
not Assad.

4. Assad merely defended his country against American armed
and trained Al Queda, and NEVER attacked innocent civillians.




--

 

Democrat Congresswoman Invokes Hitler While Discussing Assad



http://www.informationclearinghouse.i nfo/article36075.htm

How “Progressives” and the American “Left” are Failing Over Syria

"The worst Obama apologist on the panel was Matt Duss from the Center for American Progress, who explained that, although he was against a war on Syria, he “respects” that “other progressives of good faith may come to a different view.”

'Phyllis Bennis from the Institute of Policy Studies was the only consistent anti-war panelist, who appeared as a fringe element when compared to the rest of the panel, only because she offered a common sense, consistent anti-war message.

"The teach-in ended with a “what can we do” segment to influence the situation. Instead of mobilizing in the streets against Obama, the panelists discussed “contacting congressmen,” “calling the White House’s comment line,” “tweeting,” “email,” “petitions,” but no call was made for doing what was done against Bush: mobilize people in the streets to demand that the war be stopped.

'MoveOn further exposed their pro-Obama, pro-war attitude on the website, where for days the featured petition being promoted was titled: “President Obama: Don’t Strike Syria Without Congressional Approval.

Again, there is no basis for any strike on Syria, period — Congressional approval or otherwise. Even if Congress doesn’t approve Obama’s actions in Syria, it’s likely that he’ll attack Syria anyway, just as happened in Libya after Congress refused authorization.”

http://www.informationclearinghouse.i nfo/article36077.htm



CFR Prasing Al Queda Assistance in Syria ?

Al-Qaeda's Specter in Syria - Council on Foreign Relations

Council on Foreign Relations Marshals Public Opinion to Tout Syrian Destabilization

Council on Foreign Relations Marshals Public Opinion to Tout Syrian Destabilization >> Four Winds 10 - Truth Winds

Some "Left Wing” Dissent Groups Are Used to Catapult the Propaganda (Democracy Now, Amnesty)

"As in the 1950s and 60s the Ford Foundation today selectively funds anti-leftist human rights groups which focus on attacking human rights violations of U.S. adversaries, and distancing themselves from anti-imperialist human rights organizations and leaders. The FF has developed a sophisticated strategy of funding human rights groups (HRGs) that appeal to Washington to change its policy while denouncing U.S. adversaries and their "systematic" violations."

Centre for Research on Globalisation (CRG)

[video=youtube;1Vh4T0YRwLE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Vh4T0YRwLE[/video]

 

I think any right minded person can see through the deceit, and lies.

http://rt.com/op-edge/mother-chemical-attack-footage-fraud-509/#.UiuExqloMdY.twitter

Regards
Highlander

 

And the patterns of deceit, so transparent by now ...

As With Iraq, New York Times Propagates Demonstrable Lies About Syrian WMD

By Jeremy R. Hammond

http://www.informationclearinghouse.i nfo/article36192.htm

graphic

Obamas "Freedom Fighters"

[video=youtube;rwtMx4cVtFI]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rwtMx4cVtFI[/video]

 

Syrians confront terrorists in their country.

[video=youtube;7CPbXoSV-3M]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=7CPbXoSV-3M[/video]

 

Richard Holbrooke said to stop the Afghan war on his deathbed, they ignored him.

I say in order to "give peace a chance" we need to imprison the warmongers -

Lets start with Nancy Pelosi "impeachment is off the table" for conspiring to collude with war criminals as an accessory after the fact, and then get Colin Powell, Hillary Clinton, Bush and Cheney and all those Iraq war conspirators who voted for this new standard of mass murder run amok.

Whats with all this commercial media partisanship, lies, and criminality by the talking heads on TV and radio?

It is violation of Geneva to use the mass media to plant lies and fake information to incite wars of aggression on sovereign states.

But theres a lot of lying Liberal Democrats in the broadcast media who want to cover up the fact that war crimes committed by the United States Government are a bi-partisan effort, done by both parties.




___

 

Some actors are in the White House.


Too bad for the teleprompt reading fakers like Obama -

Keeping the war machine going with perpetual warfare and bogus threats ...

wont save the failed state that is the U.S. of A.

 

The U.S. isn't beyond saving, but yes, things are certainly trending in a downward direction.

I think we've definitely passed our peak as a society.

 

I wonder if Syrian Girl thinks that President Obama should be impeached and removed from office for illegally arming the Syria
terrorists and for starting the war there against Assad.

I sure think so.

There are a lot of articles on the internet talking about a second U.S. banking collapse, and a worse one than in 2008. These are not websites I frequent, however. There is also some documentation that states that corporate recovery in the U.S. is only on paper, done thru accounting tricks and that U.S. profit margins aren't a huge as people like Robert Reich are citing when he criticizes corporations for not hiring and paying a living wage.I am not an expert in this area. Many people state that the U.S. recovery since 2008 is an illusion, we are actually in a depression. There is alot of evidence like hunger in the U.S. that is startling, a new article stating there are a million homeless children in the U.S. People like to point at Detroit, but there are a lot of places like this in the country, slums, empty neighborhoods, etc.

Just to throw in for good measure, a unsubstantiated claim was made in an article at a conspiracy site (not Alex Jones, that faker) that the war in Syria was begun because America needed to start a new conflict to keep the U.S. economy from collapsing, because war appears to be our only export anymore, supposedly.


...

 

You don't need to shout, we are not deaf

 

Intervention in Syria is mostly tied to strategic influence. The war wouldn't be big enough to significantly aid our economy. So far, all the talk is mostly air strikes anyway rather than an invasion.

Basically, we're doing what we can to get rid of Russia's influence in the area while pretending it's about humanitarian concerns.

 

Basically ..... Your head isn't in the correct place. Strategic? Bollocks!
Try using your head for thinking.
You will not get rid of the Russians stupid, if youre degenerates follow their sponsors and owners AIPAC you will open pandoras box.
We will then see how brave you're idiots really are...... Ooh that's right it won't be them who will be in the front line. You'll be fighting for greater nazi Israel.
But of course you can trust them, they have never lied to you.... Not 9/11, not uss liberty, not Tolkin, and the hero, yon real moron, mc Cain, he takes some beating when it comes to low llife reprobate, selling himself when captured, making propaganda films for the Vietcong, he even murdered 134 Americans and got off scot free.

Aye, you take any chance with those you hold dear, you'll get exactly what you deserve.

Try passing the propaganda and look at the crossroads the world now sits. And all of the making of extremists. Why did Kerry have to fly to Israel to discuss the Syrian peace treaty? He was off to see his boss, waken up and smell the coffee!
It can only happen in America!
Highlander

 

Actually, the irony of the Syrian situation is that Al Nusra is a greater threat to Israel than Assad.

Assad might have connections to Hezbollah, but Hezbollah is far less dangerous than Al Nusra.

So, no, this most likely has less to do with AIPAC than most of our interventionism in the region.

Also, I'd like to clarify that I'm not supporting intervention in Syria. I'm merely stating how it most likely is viewed by the powers that be.

 

Your last sentence would depend on who's version of events one hears.
http://aangirfan.blogspot.co.uk/2013/09/russia-shot-down-two-us-missiles-fired.html

Now I'm not saying this is factual, only more likely than CNN or Fox News channel. AIPAC mouth and propaganda machine.

Regards
Highlander