Want A Gay Child? This Doctor Says He Can Inject Your Baby With A Gay Gene!

http://www.queerty.com/want-a-gay-c...can-inject-your-baby-with-a-gay-gene-20150109

HYPERLINK has full story

snip

“So it only makes sense,” Strider continues, “that same-sex couples would want children that carried out their same family values of homosexuality.”............................................

Strider claims he has the unique ability to help same-sex parents biologically produce gay children or “gaybies.”...................................

According to Strider, gay couples will soon have the option to change their straight baby into a gayby and “guarantee their same family values and acceptance throughout the next generation.”


I applaud the Dr for doing this good work. IMO, he is correct to recognize that homosexuals will want their test-tube babies to carry forth their homosexual values. By creating these "gaybies", the good Dr has offered hope to homosexuals using surrogacy to create future homosexuals.

I do hope that the Dr has success with this undertaking. The one thing with which I disagree is that he may have a larger market than he realizes. I am confident that many heterosexual couples would also want to have a "gayby"

 

Correct me if I am wrong, though I am not, but isn't your position on homosexuality that folks are not born with a predisposition towards being gay? That, through your own experiences, you opted to be straight?

That being said, wast values, as you put it, are actually genetic?

 

What a quack. Anyone who is taken in by this charlatan deserve what they get.

 

If I had to guess, it is parody. I can not find a listing for a clinic of the exact name cited in the OP, nor one for the doctor cited in the OP. I could be wrong.

 

That doctor is a quack!

 

If this was true, the homosexual movement would be ecstatic.

What really bothers them the most is that so few in society are actually available to them. They are 2% of the population, so only 2 out of every 100 people they see are fellow gay people. This ratio goes down to 1 in 50 (assuming an even distribution between gay men and gay women) that can possibly find them attractive in return, when they see plenty of other attractive people in that remaining 49 that will not find them attractive, because they are not gay.

Exposing children to the gay lifestyle, both directly and through Academia and the media, has been a goal for them, because they hope that some of these kids who are somewhat confused as to their sexuality, will grow up more willing to experiment with homosexuality. That gives homosexuals more potential sexual partners, which is the ultimate goal. If there really was a vaccine that could turn a child gay, they would potentially be able to create just as many gays in society as straight people. We would see incidents of gays randomly injecting children with the vaccine on the street. It would be a new wave of left-wing terrorism.

 

This is the most sick thing I have ever heard. How could anyone do this? I hope it is a joke. How dare the parents take that choice away from the child. I'm pretty sure this is not real though. Thank god.

 

Damn, this discussion topic is as old as the world! And we all should understand that there is no so-called "gay gene", it's just a fiction and all same-sex couples are just perverts!
homosexuality is a perversion that has its origin very early in the life of the individual. Its beginnings stem from the period when the child's sexual identity is being formed. Serious distortions(viewing gay parades for example), which may become irreversible, can occur if during those critical periods the parents fail the child through faulty presentation of polarized mature masculine and feminine identity.

 

Let me see if I am correctly summarizing your position here.

Gay people want to have kids because their goal is to have more people to (*)(*)(*)(*), and they are creating a drug where they will walk down the street injecting people so they can have more people to (*)(*)(*)(*).

Is that an accurate characterization of your position?

 

It was a hypothetical, since a vaccine doesn't actually exist. But that would be their motivation, yes.

 

Don't worry: homosexuality is a lifestyle choice.

 

Oh, a hypothetical.

And you know this alleged motivation how? Anti gay propaganda being forwarded around?

I am curious as to how you arrived at the conclusion that the reason gay people having kids is to provide more sex partners. Would you care to share? Links to your data sources? Your in depth research?

 

You're asking for evidence to support the idea that gay people wouldn't mind there being more potential partners in society?

 

No, I was asking what did you base your speculation on. Was there a factual basis or was the intent simply to make derogatory non fact based comments about gays.

 

Gays have an extremely hard time finding partners, due to the level of competition in their community.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mark-brennan-rosenberg/are-gay-men-a-gay-mans-worst-enemy_b_2759847.html

It makes sense. If you walked outside and saw 100 people, and you knew that you could only possibly find 1 other person in that group who has the capacity to find you attractive, you wouldn't hope for a different scenario where there was more options? What if you didn't find that one person attractive? You'd have to go look in another group of 100 people.

 

Let me get this straight.

You claim that gay people want to have more kids to increase the number of potential sex partners and covertly inject people with a super secret drug that makes people gay, all speculation, because Carl, according to your article, went out with some friends who sat around and gossiped about some people?

He told me that he was fed up with his gay friends in New York. That evening he had gone out with four gay friends, one of whom had left him to hook up, while the other three had gossiped about people who weren't there rather than enjoy each other's company, leaving Carl fed up.

I don't know Brewskier. I think your "speculation" is not making any sense at all.

 

Convincing you was never my objective. Gay men have faced a lot of competition in their communities for available partners, and my speculation is based on the idea that they would like more partners in society, just like anyone naturally would when only 1 out of 50 people could be a potential partner. The topic of this thread is that a doctor might be able to turn a kid gay with gene manipulation, which I commented would be celebrated by the homosexuals, who want more partners. It makes sense.

 

I disagree.

I think your speculation was wholesale nonsense meant to say incredibly derogatory things about homosexuals based not on Carl's date, as you claimed, but a premeditated need based an an irrational hatred towards all things not white, straight, and Christian.

Is that a more accurate summation of your motivations and hence ridiculous, magic drug that makes you gay speculation?

 

Only if you are arguing that the topic of this thread is not revolving around the idea that a doctor is claiming he can generate more gays in society, and that gay men do not face a high level of competition in their communities. I'm not responsible for which facts you choose to ignore, due to your political persuasion.

 

take it up with queerty.com which is not a parody site

 

And that is because Carl had a bad date, correct? Your whole basis for a rather silly bit of speculation is because of one man? So you then speculated that gays want to create a secret drug and run down the street injecting others to make them gay, correct?

Please tell me if that is not what you stated.

 

Actually, the pro-gay website made the comment that they face a lot of competition. Why would they lie about that?

 

A clearly impossible science since if homosexuality were actually mainly driven by genetics, it wouldn't have survived evolution. Let's also not forget that gay couples who adopt babies will almost always just happen to end up with a baby who was "born gay", cause the rearing of a child in a gay environment clearly has nothing to do with it. After all, they're "born gay" right, like how some other people are "born into the 'wrong' sex", and thus need the government to pay for their "sex reassignment surgery", cause to do otherwise would be ignorant.

 

So is it your contention it is factual?

 

take it up with queerty.com, they are not a parody site.

Now, as to whether or not I think the Dr's claim has merit, that is not the topic at all

it's also covered at http://homonews.info/ and homonews would not post a fake story