Of course the Nutters want you to believe that. "It's all co-intel...blah...blah...blah...." Fact is, the majority of American know that four planes were hijacked and used to crash into buildings, killing thousands of Americans. Nutters need to make up the "co-intel" scenario to so they can rationalize their Nutter position.
Fact is ..... your attitude is showing You say " the majority of Americans ..... " however I can only state that the majority of Americans are silent on this issue. if you don't hear from somebody, you have no idea what they are thinking. You say "Nutters" ..... Thank U ever so much for your judgement, That & $2 will get you a cup of coffee ..... whatever .........
Well, unless you can come up with evidence to the contrary, and I know you can't...your Nutter position is failed. No evidence of controlled demolition, no evidence of ANY explosive material...no evidence for anything other than what we all saw...buildings collapsing due to extensive damage caused by plane crash and subsequent fires.
You say "no evidence of controlled demolition" However, you have been shown evidence, there is an abundance of evidence, its just a little matter of what you consider evidence.
Actually, there isn't. There is no trace of any explosive material, no one who saw an explosion...just nothing more than anecdotal claims and assertions. The NIST debunks the controlled demolition claim, as does, ImplosionWorld.
yes and they concluded: FBI Believed that Bombs Were Used on 9/11 On 9/11, the FBI believed that bombs were involved in the attacks. How do I know that? Because, according to the FBI's website:Following the massive terrorist attacks against New York and Washington, the FBI dedicated 7,000 of its 11,000 Special Agents and thousands of FBI support personnel to the PENTTBOM investigation. "PENTTBOM" is short for Pentagon, Twin Towers Bombing.(see also this and this). Indeed, the FBI told a reporter for USA Today that FBI agents believed there were bombs in the Twin Towers. Similarly, the Washington Post believed that bombs were involved, as reflected in a September 21, 2001 article containing the following phrase:In the hours after Tuesday's bombings . . . .Many firefighters and policemen also said there were bombs in the Twin Towers. And perhaps "the premiere collapse expert in the country", who 9/11 Commissioner Timothy Roemer referred to as a "very, very respected expert on building collapse", the head of the New York Fire Department's Special Operations Command and the most highly decorated firefighter in its NYFD history, who had previously "commanded rescue operations at many difficult and complex disasters, including the Oklahoma City Bombing, the 1993 World Trade Center Bombing, and many natural disasters worldwide" thought that the collapse of the South Tower was caused by bombs, because the collapse of the building was too even to have been caused by anything else(pages 5-6). But surely experts have since proven that no bombs were involved. Right?
Just more anecdotal statements based on not having the correct information. No evidence of bomb materials was ever found or detected.
They know only what they're fed, partly because they're too lazy to research the evidence themselves, and partly because they are afraid of inferences they might discover along the way. They need to be led, and the powers that be, happily oblige. Good summation of what occurs with our information providers here: http://vigilantcitizen.com/latestnews/the-25-rules-of-disinformation/
Tangent - getting away from the intent of this thread, that is the discussion of 9/11/2001 = inside job Note the manner & speed of the destruction of WTC 1, 2 & 7 note the fact that 4 airliners allegedly hijacked & then crashed, as much as disappeared off he face of the planet.
Except for the debris and black boxes found from the airliners, not to mention the DNA of the passengers.
http://www.911research.dsl.pipex.com/ggua175/hezarkhani/ Have you seen this? If "FLT175" can be proven to be fake, the whole 9/11/2001 story falls apart and become obvious for what it is. "FLT175" is not real, no commercial airliner was hijacked & flown into the WTC.
9/11 was clearly not what we were told. Pick any one of these points (the points below being provided by the good folks at 911truth.org) and do the smallest bit of research on any one of them, and it's ridiculously easy to conclude that the story doesn't align with the facts. The more you dig, the more the obvious becomes even more visible. the unprecedented failure of the US air defense system on the morning of the attacks; the AWOL military chain of command during the actual attacks, including the inexplicable behavior of the presidential entourage; the seeming impossibility of official claims with regard to Flight 77; the evidence that Flight 93 was shot down; contradictions and dubious evidence in the official claims about the alleged hijackers and masterminds, and doubts about their real identities; signs that the alleged hijackers enjoyed high-level protection against discovery by honest investigators; evidence that the alleged hijackers were financed by states allied with US intelligence; suspicious and massive international financial trades suggesting foreknowledge of the attacks; widespread signs of official foreknowledge and, in fact, advance preparation for the 9/11 attack scenario; the long-running links between Islamist fundamentalist terror cells and US covert operations, dating back to CIA support for the anti-Soviet mujahedeen and Osama Bin Ladin himself; the demolition-like collapse of the Twin Towers and of a third skyscraper, WTC 7; and questions concerning who could have logically expected to derive benefit in the aftermath of a massive attack on the United States.
Do all the 'truthers' believe the "no planes, no victims" nonsense? Do you not realize how ignorant that claim is?
All the ones posting here have made allusions to that claim, and you haven't challenged any of your fellow board members about their 'no planes' claims. You are supportive of them in your silence.
One thing has little to do with the other, I think and I challenge the obvious lies we were all fed. You should as well.
