WATCH: Dangerous Scene as Pro-Abortion 'Protesters' Gather at Justices' Homes, Attempt to Pressure T

The objective is to intimidate Supreme Court justices and force them to change their mind. That's terrorism. It'll become violent, eventually. Just like it did when Kavanaughs was confirmed.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/su...pitol-hill-ahead-brett-kavanaugh-vote-n917351

Now, Alito and his family have been evacuated to an undisclosed location because of threats of violence.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/05/07/justice-samuel-alito-moved-undisclosed-location/

It's quickly becoming very clear that Leftists condone mob violence in order to affect government decisions.

 

The Leftists in the DOJ are going to make sure they are above the law. The 2nd Amendment is growing more important every day. They'll be coming after private citizens before long.

 

We can't prove a negative. The burden of proof is all on you.

But, one thing your claim does prove is that these terrorist demonstrations are unacceptable. Thanks for that.

 

Yep, and Fauci needs security detail. Seems like the Left is not the only one condoning mob violence.

I am against ANY violence. However, people should be able to protest the anticipated SC ruling peacefully. I don't think the house where SC judges live is the right place for such protest. However, as long as it is peaceful, it should be fine.

The problem is really that extremists on both sides are the loudest, and, therefore, winning the debate. The old saying "the squeaky wheel gets the grease" applies here too.

 

man they sure do love aborting babies

 

At least Schumer didn't go to their homes. He threatened the justices directly from the steps of the supreme court.

 

Protestors have shown up to Fauci's home, his office, anywhere for that matter? You got a link?

If anyone has, it's unacceptable. There's zero justification for that behavior.

 

I agree. You shouldn't allow it.

But you Americans are crazy about free speech/right to assemble. Is it not their constitutional right?

 

https://nypost.com/2020/08/05/fauci-says-he-and-his-daughters-need-security-over-death-threats/

I think the hate Fauci is receiving from the anti-public health rules crowd is no secret.

 

What if Trump had called out elected leaders by name and said I want to tell you you have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price?

You think there's not a single leftist on this board that would say he was NOT directly advocating violence?

Hypocrites have nothing but partisan blindness and double standards

 

But, terrorists haven't shown up up at his house, or office. The only evidence we have is Fauci's word. If Fauci is telling the truth, then that behavior is unacceptable.

 

Worse. They are not just protesting they are attempting to take over a branch of the federal government.

 

Lmao!
Hyperbole much?

 

Let's get your opinion shall we?
If Trump had called out elected leaders by name in front of an assembled group in public, and said that they would "reap the whirlwind and you would pay the price".......

Would you say that he was advocating violence?
Consider rhetorical or you can humor us and give us your answer

 

You find a couple of anecdotes of right wing counter protest creating violence, and apply that to all protests in all areas, making the claim the majority were started by right wingers.

It's seriously manipulating data to serve your agenda, and nobody is buying it.

There are literally thousands of examples of BLM and antifa protestors looting, burning police cars, setting building ablaze. The majority were peaceful, many were not.

But you're living in absolute fantasy land suggesting the violence and destruction following the Flyod incident was instigated by Right wingers "mostly"

Nobody is buying that.

 

Completely different protest to the hundreds of protests I was referencing. You know that, but facts don't matter. Only your agenda matters.

A try extremist.

 

LOL! Are they storming the Supreme Court flying Biden flags and being "armed" with nooses? I guess not, so they are not trying to take over a branch of the federal government, unlike Trumpers on 1/6.

 

What does "...there will be hell to pay" mean exactly towards a lifetime appointed justice?

 

Anybody that claims the summer of riots and violence was perpetrated by Right wingers is just a flat out bold face liar.

The problem is, the faux outrage about other events will make them hypocritical. So they start lying.

Doesn't it suck when your platform requires you to choose to be either a hypocrite or liar? Maybe your ideologies are the problem.

 

What does "...there will be hell to pay" mean exactly towards a lifetime appointed justice?

 

Yes, Schumer shouldn't have used those words. And, as a grown man, he apologized for them:

"I shouldn't have used the words I did, but in no way was I making a threat. I never — never — would do such a thing."

Trump could learn from him.

 

That is Off-Topic "Whatabiutism" which can easily dismissed with a polite chuckle.
BUT, in general, I do feel that topics of this nature can lend themselves to unrealistic hyperbole...
Like confusing the concept of "stayed on the street" with "surrounded"

 

As long as it is done lawfully and this is not.

 

And you would agree both sides should be treated equally?

 

As I said. So don't you agree we should go after these insurrectionist the same as the Jan 6 protesters?

18 USC 1507 is ADDITIONAL to insurrection.

It's been ongoing for a WEEK now. And of all things people breaking into to churches on MOTHERS DAY to protest mothers may not be able to kill their babies as much as they can now. A Pro-Life organization betting fire bombed. Police in LA being injured by Pro-Abortion radicals.

TOO CLOSE

Start with these for incitement to riot and insurrection.

‘Let’s Burn This Place Down’: Left Calls For Violence After Treasonous SCOTUS Abortion Leak
https://thefederalist.com/2022/05/0...olence-after-treasonous-scotus-abortion-leak/