Well then use your superior statistics knowledge to break it down for us. Exactly how many times more likely do you calculate it being, given that Muslims are 1% of the population? Please show us your work.
That's insane. Meantime, I was referring to the apparently unwitting reversal of ideological roles in the masses. Progressives don't SEEM to realise they're now the arch conservatives - but again, I'm not so sure they don't know.
Violence comes in various forms from the occasional (family) to the general public. Under Replicant governments (both state and Federal) and the senseless notion that "we all have the right to have highly murderous weapons", Uncle Sam has come to tbe The Shameful Example of What Not To Do. Thank you Uncle Sam - and pity for the American public who must suffer the consequences of such a deadly deviance from political-responsibility ...
The point is well made: Islamists are NOT committing daily acts of terror on American soil. Not yet, anyway. (And certainly not in the manner they are doing so here in Europe - not daily but periodically. The European governments have undertaken serious efforts to watch-over these groups and root them out - very often the result being to fire-fights killing them. How often have you seen that in the US? If so, please post those incidences where Islamists have been brought to justice for such crimes and the comparison with Ordinary Christian Americans who do the same. Because far more muslims immigrated to Europe* than the US over the past twenty-years, and nobody understands why these "kids" born and raised in the European Union could have adopte "Islamists theologies" in such numbers. Anyway, now that they are stuck where they are in the Middle-east, Europe is refusing to allow them and their families to reenter. Even if the original Islamist-male is dead and has left a family. (The reason being that the Islamist female - even in Europe - was trained from birth to do ONLY the bidding of her male-authority (father or husband), the mother being the teacher of that outrageous submission to her children.) Moreover, the term "Jihadism" (also "jihadist movement", "jihadi movement" and variants) is a 21st-century neologism found in Western languages to describe Islamist militant movements perceived as military movements "rooted in Islam" and "existentially threatening" to the West ... *And some are members of present governments in the countries to which they immigrated. In fact, most of them are second and third generations.
Do you know what the word "DEBATE" means in a Debate Forum? It means that the mindless idiocies as you have posted are irrelevant ...
Let's face facts. Regardless of his beliefs, this guy fomented the carnage with a machine-gun THAT HE SHOULD HAVE NEVER BEEN ALLOWED TO ACCESS! We have gone machine-gun-crazy, and we are now paying the consequences. Thank you the NRA - thank you, thank you, thank you ... ! PS: I am a Yank who lives in Europe, where there are actually jihadists who get their hands on AK-47s and do what they do. But those guns are not available commonly. They are generally forbidden by law!
Baltimore has almost double Chicago's homicide rate. Chicago has 26 per capita and Baltimore tips the scales at a whopping 55 per capita. They tipped the scales at 309 homicides in 2018.
309 homicides in one year. That's an astounding number. By and large non-white people for sure. Where are you on this progressives? You're the alleged champions of non-white people. Can you offer anything other than ill informed comments about guns, and diversions towards Trump?
Such assumes that individuals do not horde large amounts of ammunition for use at a later date. If word were to get out about plans to shut down production of modern ammunition, that which is on the market would be horded and stockpiled, even by the individuals who should not have it. Potential murderers could easily have access to thousands of rounds of ammunition by the time such a course of action worked its way into existence. The modern defense industry of the united states relies on private firearms ownership in order to say afloat, as the government contracts simply do not provide enough funding to pay the bills.
HIV and/or AIDS is highly communicable, incurable, and fatal in all cases for those who contract it. Yet such is not sufficient grounds to remove those who are infected from society to prevent them from intentionally spreading their infection to others.
Good question. Because the lack-of-gun-laws is the Central Reason that the tragedies exist! From the Guardian: I hope we all understand what's behind the raging gun-control polemic. And if it has to cost you your life, will that be one cost too much? The people responsible for the shootings know full well they are risking their lives. And, that is precisely what they want. It is a form of mental-illness ...
You are incorrect. We have the right to firearms. The shame is that violence is ignored when is doesn't help gain power.
I guess Trump needs to fire this guy. FBI Director Christopher Wray told Congress this week that most of the domestic terrorism arrests made so far this fiscal year have been associated with white supremacy. He pointed to about 100 arrests of "homegrown violent extremist terrorists" (these are generally the "radical Islamic terrorists") and about the same number of "domestic terrorists" (violent Americans with some kind of domestic beef), clarifying that the latter were mostly white supremacists. https://www.upworthy.com/most-domestic-terrorism-comes-from-white-supremacists-fbi-tells-lawmakers
The phrase "domestic extremist-related fatalities" is a new politically correct term. Here's how it breaks down. White Nationalist are responsible for 73% of domestic extremist-related fatalities, but domestic extremist-related fatalities account for less than 1% of all U.S. murders. So if White Nationalist only account for .73% of all U.S. murders than who's responsible for the other 99.27%? Oh, I know. Non White Nationalist.