We Must Stop Surrendering to Leftist Evil Such as Black Lives Matter

There are no guarantees in this world except taxes and death but I feel that this is right on line. Either way we shall see.

 

Is there another choice in the matter? I don't think so.

 

On you signature:

Reagan was all for amnesty because he made a deal with the Democrats: he would support a one-time amnesty of 3 million if the Democrats would seal the border. Well ... Reagan did his part, but then the Democrats dishonorably backed away from doing their part. Democrats lie.

This is why Republicans will do nothing on immigration until the border is secure. If and when that happens, everything else is negotiable.

 

Come on; many of us have has memorable interceptions by the police, and we're still living to tell the tale, because we followed directions. We don't have to be black to know how upsetting it was.

As you correctly note...any interaction with the police has a good chance of turning out badly. They've cost me thousands over the years..as well as a couple of beatings.

And yea...being black makes it exponentially worse...as statistics show.

- - - Updated - - -

I'd like to see a link to this deal -please.

 

Dallas was one lunatic with a semi-auto...not unlike Dylan Roof.

 

So you're advocating racial violence...

Wonderful

 

I just looked quickly and found a decent article by David Frum in The Atlantic from November 2014. I don't know how to link on a phone. I'm sure there are many more articles.

It says the 3 million given amnesty was a "one time" event made with assurance that the border would be secured, but Congress didn't secure the border and illegal immigration actually went up in the years after the amnesty. Among Republicans, it's well known this was the one big regret of Reagan's presidency (Iran-Contra may have been another). Reagan was snookered by Congress. He was a smart man, but he was taken on this one.

 

Not necessarily racial violence. We just need to expose BLM and others like them. Show Americans who they really are and want they really want. It's like shining a light on roaches; they'll scatter. It won't require physical violence.

 

It was doomed to failure because

Why were the employer restrictions so ineffective? During the debate in Congress, the bill's sponsors ended up watering down the sanctions on employers to attract support from the business community, explains Wayne Cornelius of the Center for Comparative Immigration Studies at U.C. San Diego. "The end result was that they essentially gutted the employer sanctions," he says.

Under the final law, all employers had to do to avoid sanctions was to make sure their workers had paperwork that "reasonably appears on its face to be genuine." If the documents were decent fakes, that wasn't the boss's problem. In fact, employers were actually penalized if they scrutinized a worker's nationality too aggressively.

What's more, industries such as agriculture, construction and landscaping often skirted the paperwork rules by relying on contractors and subcontractors. That made it easier for companies to maintain plausible deniability. In California, up to 80 percent of seasonal harvesting is done through contractors — and unauthorized immigrants are thought to make up a massive portion of the workforce.

- - - Updated - - -

And who are they?

They're ordinary people who are fed up with being targeted by police because of the color of their skin and the neighborhood they live in.

- - - Updated - - -

So the 1986 law didn't work? Not quite. The number of unauthorized immigrants in the country rose from roughly 5 million in 1986 to 11.1 million today. Part of that was due to flimsy enforcement measures. But a major conceptual flaw in the bill, says Doris Meissner, was that the authors of the bill simply misjudged the high demand for immigrant labor in the United States.

"Congress didn't foresee at the time that employers would want more immigrants in the years ahead," Meissner says. As a result, the law never set up a good process to provide as many legal immigrants as the labor markets would demand in the years ahead.

That meant that after the 1986 reform passed, there was a bottleneck for legal immigration and weak rules against illicit hiring. Given the still-high demand for foreign labor, the end result was, predictably, a boom in illegal immigration.

 

The problem with this argument is it uses a disparity that black Americans face to counter another disparity they face. Yes, there is a disparity in our justice system, not only are blacks shot and killed by police at a higher rate than whites, but blacks killed by police are unarmed at more than double the rate of the white people who are killed by police.

This isn't the only disparity they face, there's an income disparity, which in turn means poorer schooling districts, higher unemployment, and higher crime. If you believe that BLM activists are reluctant to address all of these disparities that exist within the US, you are greatly mistaken

 

Dylan Roof was basically a modern member of the KKK. The Dallas shooter was of the BLM ilk.

KKK = BLM.

- - - Updated - - -

Negative; i'm saying non-blacks being targeted by BLM thugs have a right to defend themselves. I assure you there are many blacks who hate BLM that would fight by the moral side.

 

He will pen strongly worded posts on the internet! Then likely have a nap. All that copying and pasting looks tiring.

 

KKK rallies don't look like this

 

The non-black in BLM are basically 'house slaves' who are selling out their our nation and race. They are a disgrace.

 

Or maybe you're wrong about the movement being about racial supremacy.

 

There are dead police officers in Dallas who have proven this wrong. There is no more debate on what BLM is; they are a hate group.

 

One lunatic who was influenced by Marxist progressive bs.

 

You're using the worst possible example to demonstrate what an entire group actually is, it's disingenuous. If the lone gunman represented the group, then he wouldn't be a lone gunman

 

You say that very authoritatively. I envy you.

 

What you fail to acknowledge is that the relations in Dallas, are of the most trusting variety. The police the screw it, Im writing an OP.

 

OK, being a liberal useful idiot is a great thing. Glad you could participate.

 

Uh....just how does one nut killing police officers make BLM a hate group? In fact, how does one lone nut with no known ties to BLM have anything to do with BLM at all? In fact, how does it make BLM a hate group even if one lone nut actually HAD ties to BLM.

This is bull(*)(*)(*)(*). You CANNOT logically infer ANYTHING from the actions of a NUT, and if you do you're crazier than the nut.

 

well he certainly isnt able to think for himself....

 

its really hard for me to imagine how evil, cruel and hateful one has to be to call a movement with the name "black lives matter" an evil

US conservatives are such disgusting hateful people

 

So, if a mentally disturbed person used Dr Suess Rhymes in his killings, Dr Suess is a murderous philosophy?