I watched a TV show where the panel of commentators were all in agreement how they hated a transracial person's attempt to go from white to black. Yet these same hypocrites gladly embrace the person wanting to go from male to female or vice versa. What is the difference in the mind of the liberal? Should both type of trans people either be accepted or hated the same? Why show favorites.
Why do we allow people to raise and slaughter cows but not dogs? Why do we allow gay marriage, but not child marriage, in most states? This is a seriously flawed attempt at an argument. Transgender and "transracial", whatever that is, are not the same thing.
As long as it's sincere and consistent, I see no reason to think of them differently. There is some sensitivity with the racial thing because of the history of using blackface to ridicule blacks, but if that's not what it is, then being offended would be oversensitive and unfair. Don't know if I'm representative of whatever "liberals" you're thinking of though.
The cows and dogs analogy makes sense. It's just cultural. But gay and child marriage are obviously different due to the issue of consent.
This OP shows you need to take classes in statistics, demographic studies, critical thinking skills and logic. To your credit I will say you have it spelled and punctuated properly.
Exactly my point. These things are different and people have decided that they should be treated differently. In some cultures they are not. You don't have to look far to find states where a child can be married off to an adult. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_marriage_in_the_United_States Not to mention other countries where this is legal and common.
I like apples but not oranges. Does that make me a hypocrite for not liking all types of fruit? WTF is transracial anyway? Not a concept I am familiar with.
and the far right hates anyone that doesn't goose step with them. Goes for every other race as well as all them race traitors.
And our corporate state media machine has as its most urgent mission, the distraction, confusion, misinforming, misleading, anxiety generation, mindphucking and division of the masses. Anyone paying any attention to any "panel of commentators" and participating in the propagation of the corporate state's channeling of societal conversation is not a healthy person to be around.
I've found that anyone that pays attention to paranoid deep state anti-establishment conspiracy theorists are even less healthy to be around. I do agree that the "cable news" is at least 95% opinion and 5% actual reportage. There are way too many people who cannot tell the difference between journalism and the rumor, innuendo, accusation, interpretation, assumption, and fallacy that passes for "cable new" (right and left)