Why DO we want to fill America with non-whites?

angola

botswana


ghana

sudan

 

I guarantee that all of that infrastructure was designed by non-African firms and will only be found in the CBD where foreign firms do business.

How about showing some integrity and showing what's outside?

 

Thats pretty speculative isnt it? Its bad to hate so much, you'll give yourself a heart attack ^^

 

"STOP THE HATE!!!!"
"Don't correct facts about Africa!!!!"

 

You made an assumption that Africans cannot design buildings, that's not a very intelligent response is it? Let's be honest with each other, the only vibe I am getting here is some sort of antagonism. If you're going to act like that then I'll post elsewhere if that's what you want.

 

I'm simply asking you to support your position with sufficient facts. That involve pointing out insufficient facts. Accusing me of "hate" for that: not amtagonistic?

 

It's rather hateful to say that blacks are backward don't you think?

 

I think it would be more harmful to pretend they weren't, on average.

 

I think it is hateful to say they are backward but that's just my opinion.

 

I got that. Thanks.

 

Yes, we know.

 

"We"? Perhaps, then, you could stop pointlessly repeating yourself. Thanks.

 

Im not arguing the Indians wouldnt have done that. I'm simply saying, has colonization from centuries ago turned the US or Canada into poor unstable anarchy places like Somalia?

 

How many American Indians are still left in places like New York for example?

 

Wait I'll just google the number.

Can't find it. Let's say it's 1000 for the sake for argument.

Now can you explain how that's relevant, or is it just "oh no White people did something mean sometime in history" chanted like a mantra in any discussion of race. Should I bring up how American Indians tortured little girls to death, and go on and on about it? Or would that be irrelevant to the point under discussion.

 

Did Europe draw artificial borders in Japan?

 

I'd appreciate it if you could find an accurate figure as this is very important in addressing Sam's point. Or do you think Sam's point is irrelevant?

 

What does that have to do with anything? The Indian population prior to colonization wasnt significantly larger than it is now, either.

 

Hmm, can you honestly not see? Do you even follow your own conversations or are you just a troll?

Of course there is no anarchy in the United Snakes. The biggest threat to rule of law was the indigenous population that was being conquered. Once that barrier was removed the Colonizers had free reign.

 

Good question.

 

Atrocities agaist american indians ended a long time ago. Colonization had no long term negative effects on America a whole. In fact, America had drawn borders, but is now a global superpower because of European colonization.

- - - Updated - - -

Drawn borders arent a signnificant cause of poverty.

 

Yes. You were permitted dominion over this land, by the Native Americans, to do all of your experiments yet all of these inventions have just led to more wars, exported abroad, with no endgame. I'm starting to think that this is by design, kind of like a planned obsolescence.

 

Canada, the US, and Australia have good standards of living overall. The same cant be said about Nigeria or Somalia or Liberia.

 

What utter nonsense.

 

That has a certain amount of truth to it, yes.