More and more being the hundred or so uber-bigots at DU.com What Americans of significant number are asking is... ...will the left riot when Mueller has no choice but to end his investigation and declare that Trump cannot be accused of wrong-doing?
As for English grammar, may I suggest a few lessons of your own are in order? "I have no idea what '(you're' )trying to say" would be a good start with your own grammar woes.
And the ten month investigation into obstruction by Mueller is coming to a head with the evidence we now have; http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow/...n-takes-shape-ahead-of-schedule-1209836611594
Too late. He already has; http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow/...n-takes-shape-ahead-of-schedule-1209836611594
There are so many obsessive spokespersons for this nebulous, ubiquitous, and amorphous "left" upon which they fixate, it's difficult to reconcile their copious ravings with reality. In every public survey, most folks just agree that Trump stinks
Collusion has already been proven while you cowardly divert the conversation to collusion away from obstruction.
Well I like anyone who keeps a thesaurus handy but what does all that have to do with the assumption of lefties rioting?
Huh? I'm asking if you'd mine telling me what was in that video link you provided because I don't want to listen to Mr Maddow's voice. You don't have to of course but I'll be real honest with you ...I'm not going to listen to him, cant stand his voice, soo....
Lefties have t That's your problem, and I don't care what "you can't stand". You are either aware of the evidence or not. As long as I am, that's all that matters.
Trump should have confidence that allowing a thorough, diligent, and complete investigation by the Trump Justice Department Special Counsel, coupled with his candid cooperation in providing testimony under oath to him, will reveal the truth and expose the overwhelming evidence of his always having been a pillar of rectitude. His incontinent hysterics might lead one to suspect that the truth is not his friend, and that the security of US elections being protected from covert perversions by hostile foreign interests is not his selfless, patriotic priority. His squealing in a pierced porcine similitude does not ring of confidence.
Sandy Shanks a frequent poster tries to prove Trump colluded with Russia. Day after day he fails. Why do you think your tiny one liners can do what Sandy can't do when he posts entire pages of his prose? Maddow came from my local area and is just a daily bother on Msnbc. I think there might be a law against being a republican where she came from in Castro Valley, Ca. 66 percent living there speak English. Not bad compared to the 56 percent of CA residents who speak English. http://www.areavibes.com/castro+valley-ca/demographics/
I guess the blanket catch-all sobriquet could include Trump's goons in Charlottesville, but it behooves us to be more precise. It would be helpful if the pantywaists who persistently snivel about their bête noire "leftists" could be more specific.
A court is not needed in advance of the proof. Evidence speaks for truth and justice as long as it is present. You seem to struggle with this as if it is some kind of phenomenon from which you have no understanding of? Or is this just your own way of prolonging what is inevitable? Either way, these off tense scenarios you invent for yourself, disguised as a debate, have no value.
