Agreed: I did not make the legal case that Trump committed the crime of Obstruction. Do you want me to? I don't really want to simply copy and paste the Mueller report for you, but I can't point you to the relevant pages, if you like. Your "knowledge" includes your subjective interpretation of the Mueller report, if you read it. Did you ? As I said, this obstruction seems the biggest threat. Yes, it's my subjective interpretation, and that of 1027 former federal prosecutors. You are rejecting if based on your own subjective interpretation (if you actually read the report), or perhaps just out of faith. Seriously, given the assessment by these former prosecutors, it should be clear that active prosecutors might make the same judgment and indict him. It is THEIR subjective interpretation that identifies the THREAT to Trump. You mean for obstruction? My guess is because the House felt the Republican Senate wouldn't convict him. Good that they didn't try, because this would have created a sort of "double jeopardy" for Trump, acquitting him in the Senate trial and then trying him again for this crime in a courtroom. In a courtroom, he'd have an unbiased jury.