World population projected to reach 9.8 billion in 2050, and 11.2 billion in 2100

https://www.un.org/development/desa/en/news/population/world-population-prospects-2017.html

"The current world population of 7.6 billion is expected to reach 8.6 billion in 2030, 9.8 billion in 2050 and 11.2 billion in 2100, according to a new United Nations report being launched today. With roughly 83 million people being added to the world’s population every year, the upward trend in population size is expected to continue, even assuming that fertility levels will continue to decline."



http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2011/08/23/car-population_n_934291.html

"The number of cars on the world's roads surpassed one billion last year, according to a study that has spurred debate on what the rapidly-growing car population will mean for the world's economy and environment.

According to a report from Ward's Auto released last week, the global number of cars exceeded 1.015 billion in 2010, jumping from from 980 million the year before."


https://www.universetoday.com/25756/surface-area-of-the-earth/

According to modern estimates, the surface area of the Earth is approximately 510 million square km (5.1 x 108 km2) or 196,900,000 square miles.


7.6 billion persons on 196,900,000 square miles leads to 38.6 persons per square mile.


https://hypertextbook.com/facts/2001/DanielChen.shtml

"The surface area of the bodies [water] takes up 70 percent of earth's total surface area while the land only takes up 30 percent.


http://www.zo.utexas.edu/courses/thoc/land.html

"The total land surface area of Earth is about 57,308,738 square miles, of which about 33% is desert and about 24% is mountainous."


7.6 billion persons on 57,308,738 square miles leads to 132.62 persons per square mile.

11.2 billion persons on 57,303,738 square miles leads to 195.4 persons per square mile. This is an addition of 62.8 persons per square mile than what it is today.


There are around 7.6 billion persons today with over 1 billion cars being operated. The Earth has a land area of 57,308,738 square miles. 7.6 billion persons, 1.015 billion 'cars' is roughly about 1 'car' for every 7.9 persons.


Given the same ratio of car to persons; 1:7.9, then with a population of 11.2 billion (Year 2100), there would be roughly 1,417,721,519 cars in the year 2100. This is an increase of 3,600,000,000 persons and an increase of 402,721,519 cars with the same ratio of 1 car for every 7.9 persons. With the increase of population density and car density, parking structure densities will also need to increase and additional dwelling structures, such as homes and apartments, will need to be developed to accommodate the new 3 billion 600 million persons.


The Year 2100 is 83 years away.


The world may only be seeing the beginning phases of 'homelessness' in today's time.


If the work/job market is fully saturated and if homes, apartments, etc vacancies are fully filled, the remaining of the population who are not in the job market nor in homes, etc, will not be 'homeless' due to their own desire to be homeless but could be due to the lack of resources which can place them in the 'non-homeless' statistic.


Charles Darwin's Theory of 'Survivability', might be able to be applied to the 'needs' of individuals to either be indwelt or homeless, if and when, the demands for dwellings are greater than the supplies of dwellings.


However Government is set and Established to always keep the needs of the poor in Truth.

Proverbs 29:14
"The king that faithfully judgeth the poor, his throne shall be established for ever."

The king, or Government, needs to understand the difference between the poor and the abusers of self with mankind.


1 Corinthians 6:9-10
"Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God."


'Abusers of themselves with mankind' does not specifically refer to LGBT.

 

A topic no one dare talk about, particularly if they point out WHERE and the race/ethnicity of the growth is. To do so is instantly to be called a racist.

As for the USA, Democrats cheer high birthrates of non-whites, while cheering low birthrates of whites. Take the opposite stance and all the MSM will rant that you are racist.

 

What percentage of the adult LGBT community are fully and gainfully employed?

https://www.bna.com/lgbt-minorities-face-high-unemployment-job-discrimination-low-wages-study-finds/

Nov. 15 --The nation's estimated 1.8 million lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender workers of color are particularly disadvantaged, with higher levels of unemployment and on-the-job discrimination as well as lower wages than other employees, the Movement Advancement Project and other think tanks reported Nov. 14.


Regardless of sexual orientation, race, ethnicity or any other 'human factor'; even including legal citizenship, a gainful employment might prove to be the difference between the 'indoor and outdoor' groups.


The saying, 'I don't want to work', coming from the lips of an adult person might have them to receive the adult consequence for their adult choice.

And, of course, there are those adults in the 'age groupings' which is exempt from 'rightful' and gainful employment.

Rightful employment can refer to 'legal' employment.


And do not worry about 'prejudicial' treatment to any so called Religious person(s) for even their own Scriptures say the same and they are also under the same 'guidelines'.

2 Thessalonians 3:10
"For even when we were with you, this we commanded you, that if any would not work, neither should he eat."


Matthew 20:1-15
"For the kingdom of heaven is like unto a man that is an householder, which went out early in the morning to hire labourers into his vineyard. 2And when he had agreed with the labourers for a penny a day, he sent them into his vineyard. 3And he went out about the third hour, and saw others standing idle in the marketplace, 4And said unto them; Go ye also into the vineyard, and whatsoever is right I will give you. And they went their way. 5Again he went out about the sixth and ninth hour, and did likewise. 6And about the eleventh hour he went out, and found others standing idle, and saith unto them, Why stand ye here all the day idle? 7They say unto him, Because no man hath hired us. He saith unto them, Go ye also into the vineyard; and whatsoever is right, that shall ye receive.

8So when even was come, the lord of the vineyard saith unto his steward, Call the labourers, and give them their hire, beginning from the last unto the first. 9And when they came that were hired about the eleventh hour, they received every man a penny. 10 But when the first came, they supposed that they should have received more; and they likewise received every man a penny. 11And when they had received it, they murmured against the goodman of the house, 12Saying, These last have wrought but one hour, and thou hast made them equal unto us, which have borne the burden and heat of the day. 13But he answered one of them, and said, Friend, I do thee no wrong: didst not thou agree with me for a penny? 14Take that thine is, and go thy way: I will give unto this last, even as unto thee. 15Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? Is thine eye evil, because I am good?"


I do believe that a 'denarius' in those days could buy a person a loaf of bread for food sustenance.


Many non religious persons find this parable truly unfair to the workers and as being discriminatory. However if you re-read the parable, you will see that it was not discriminatory nor unfair to the other workers.

And so this parable is applied to both the work place and to The Kingdom of Heaven. That which is 'agreed' upon is what shall be given and received.

 

If you find the increase of population coming out from the 'poor' Countries or out from the 'poor persons', remember that it is themselves that have to raise and keep their own children provided for. Their own children are their own responsibility and if they know that monetary assistance is not going to be freely handed out for every child born, then they might begin to 'plan' their parenthood rather than just procreating in carelessness. And not all Countries have the same sort of 'Government Assistance' sliding scale, depending on 'dependents', as The U.S. does.

I have not done any research into what population in The U.S. has the largest numbers of Government Assistances in relation to population increase but I don't think that the human population growth in The U.S. is ONLY being done by 1 or 2 groups of 'people'.

So regardless of if the human population is increasing due to the top levels of the economic ladder or if the human population is increasing due to the lowest levels of the economic ladder, human population increase is increase but it takes money to raise and tend and keep to a child.

It would be a wrong statement to say that it is only the upper classes which are procreating and having 'babies'. And it would be just as wrong to say the same for the lower classes. But pregnancies do require the woman to be 9 months pregnant regardless of which economic level they are on.


I can not see why any sound minded woman would want to put herself through 9 months plus child delivery for a couple of hundred additional dollars added to her income. That is not a sound mind.

She would have more income earning potential if she got her mind straightened out. Who knows, she might be an Executive or some other if she did.


It is an abhorring thing to throw away a sound mind. People would be in shock if they saw such things.

Throwing away a sound mind is as if throwing away an entire life. A lifelong suicide, more or less. And sometimes, this throwing away of a sound mind, occurs from a second or third party.

Neglect, coming from Authorities and Rulers, is an example.

 

Songs, today, speak of 'self opinions' rather than Truthful sayings. I find that the only True Statement that comes forth from the above posted song is, 'I believe the children are the future'. Not even really 'our' future since we will still be alive and well when they are in their 20's or 30's but more so for those they are 'ruling' over in age and authority when they age into the age of their adult years.

Although the future's public militia is impacted by the children of today, Rulers and Authorities are supposed to keep such things in check, as it should be in every generation.

Unless the 'laws', which are needing to be enforced change, it would be up to the individual Ruler and Authority to choose and decide if they want to enforce.

 

If songs were true to Life, then I could add this song to the list of Life and how it really is....