Murdoch is another, but for the other side. Most billionaires fund both parties, because it makes more sense to buy both sides if you can.
i'm 53 years old, it's 4th graders that walk around saying 'prove it', when they have no clue what that means
WTF are you talking about....WHO TF doesn't know what "prove it" means??? Even a 4th grader does! Why do you keep saying that I don't know what that means? LOL, it's just so ridiculous!
i knew you had no clue what the 'burden of proof' is and wouldn't bother to look up so i'll spoon feed it to you, though i doubt it'll get through that way either Holder of the burden When debating any issue, there is an implicit burden of proof on the person asserting a claim. "If this responsibility or burden of proof is shifted to a critic, the fallacy of appealing to ignorance is committed". This burden does not necessarily require a strictly logical proof, although many strong arguments do rise to this level (such as in logical syllogisms). Rather, the evidential standard required for a given claim is determined by convention or community standards, with regard to the context of the claim in question. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophic_burden_of_proof you certainly haven't proven any association between communism and you tube you've made some vague assertions about you tube, comments settings and communism which are really quite ridiculous and then said that an article from the blaze is proof of communism, when it doesn't even mention communism once do you even know what communism is?
i took several classes at university that fleshed it out quite well and have been behind the iron curtain your assertion that you tube is a joke, it's a capitalistic corporation
When the government orders a private business to do something....it is communism. Did you look at any of these links? It's happening. http://www.redstate.com/neil_stevens...ing-in-a-tree/ http://obamalies.net/google-lies.html http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1108/15487.html http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-va...zy-with-google http://www.theblaze.com/stories/watc...h-obama-admin/ http://www.theblaze.com/stories/obam...earch-results/ http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/0...dministration/ http://www.newsnmax.com/blog/Rush_Li...urpose_28.html __________________ http://www.newenglishreview.org/file..._alinksy_3.jpg
you're confusing communism with authoritarian communism - a political theory derived from Karl Marx, advocating class war and leading to a society in which all property is publicly owned and each person works and is paid according to their abilities and needs. authoritarian - favoring or enforcing strict obedience to authority, esp. that of the government, at the expense of personal freedom: the transition from an authoritarian to a democratic regime. • showing a lack of concern for the wishes or opinions of others; domineering; dictatorial: he had an authoritarian and at times belligerent manner. http://www.redstate.com/neil_stevens...ing-in-a-tree/ yes, but i stopped after getting this from your first link: Error 404 - Not Found not to mention that you seem to be oblivious to the benefits that come from nonpartisan info sources you seem to prefer to swallow partisan political rhetoric then repost it like it's going out of style
HAHA areyou saying that a communist government does not control what the population will read/see/write? REALLY? I'm not confusing anything.
no i'm saying you're confused and don't know what you're talking about you tube isn't communistic any more than newt is for disabling comments on his videos [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pSkLw6UvpaM"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pSkLw6UvpaM[/ame] you don't think newt is a communist, do you?
no, i'm trying to get you to be rational good riddance you obvious realize you're wrong and can't logically address the points i've made clear, so you run away
