The topic of this thread requires some history, but there is a glaring inconsistency that needs to be addressed by one of PF's posters. The following transcript from this thread will lay out the topic to be addressed. In this thread: Clearly more than zero. I await evidence to back up this "zero" buried claim.
I'm really curious why suede is unwilling to back up his claim. He's made thread after thread focusing on the minutiae of what "percentage" was buried, yet can't back up his zero percent buried claim?
Maybe now there are three Flight93 threads, he will feel he can relax and open up; the pressure isn't all on him and his threads. I for one can't wait to hear his evidence!
Considering he entered this forum in a disingenuous manner, it should come as no surprise that he continues with that approach.
Show some proof that the metal was placed in the hole by the 'bucket scoop'. This image was used as evidence in a trial. Do you know something the defense attorneys didn't?
the 'bucket scoop' is called a backhoe....it articulates in such a way.that it would be hardto put anything in the bucket....
So what is your proof this WASN'T taken at Shanksville? You can deny ANY photo just by pretending ignorance, but all it does is prove ignorance. Without evidence backing your claims up, all they are is bull(*)(*)(*)(*).
Show some proof that it wasn't? The fact that it was used in trial proves absolutely nothing, other than it was used to represent "something". So, there's ONE.....got anything else in the way of photographic evidence as to 93 being "buried"? By the way...the rusted metal didn't look to be "buried" there either.
That is the Truther mantra in a nutshell right there. You attempt to place your anonymous opinion on an equal level with something that was submitted as evidence in a court of law. Well wedged sir.
It was submitted as evidence..perhaps. It proves...???? What? That there is a rusty piece of metal on top of a hole. What hole? Where? When? Of what? Who says it was represented as 93's engine, in Shanksville, 0n 9/11/2001? Any corroborating evidence of a photographic nature? Anything?
There is no perhaps, it was submitted as evidence. As were these. In the ground, on the ground, in the trees, etc... http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/notablecases/moussaoui/exhibits/prosecution/P200058.html http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/notablecases/moussaoui/exhibits/prosecution/P200058.html http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/notablecases/moussaoui/exhibits/prosecution/P200059.html http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/notablecases/moussaoui/exhibits/prosecution/P200062.html http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/notablecases/moussaoui/exhibits/prosecution/P200063.html http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/notablecases/moussaoui/exhibits/prosecution/P200064.html http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/notablecases/moussaoui/exhibits/prosecution/P200065.html http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/notablecases/moussaoui/exhibits/prosecution/P200066.html http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/notablecases/moussaoui/exhibits/prosecution/P200061.html
You must see something I do not. Evidence of a plane seems to be missing. Lotta specs of something, and what looks to be the other half of the prop left on the lawn at the Pentagon. At any rate, no evidence of a plane being buried in any fashion. So, I guess you're on the side of the FBI being "incorrect" with that detail?
Back to Youtube vids for you I guess. Btw, the topic of this thread is prove that zero percent of United 93 was buried (something your buddy suede claimed yet appears afraid to defend). At least three of those photos that were presented as actual EVIDENCE in a trial show debris that was in the ground. So anyway....
I don't doubt that they were presented in trial. I'm merely disputing (at this particular point in time) that they show no "proof" confirming anything about 93, it being buried (or anything else for that matter). The FBI claimed it was buried underground almost entirely...I didn't. I'm just repeating their obvious lies for the purposes of further confirming that 9/11 was a huge farce.
Here's the thing 'fraud, this is the part where you provide some evidence backing your assertion. As it stands, the only thing your speculation proves, is that it's your speculation and nothing else.
Yeah...I suppose. Funny thing about a lot of videos though. They're often good at verifying or discrediting slanted opinions (or outright lies). Not always final proof, but certainly a "tool" in determining the truth (for those that are actually looking for it).
Okay...I'll play...I'm in the mood. Which SPECIFIC assertion do you wish me to provide some proof of? (knowing you'll never accept any, but putting that aside for humor's sake).
I myself, can't prove that it was, or it wasn't buried. I can only present what it is that the FBI was saying at the time. That what you want?