+ Reply to Thread
+ Post New Thread
Page 2 of 9 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 88

Thread: Truth finally being taught in college

  1. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BullsLawDan View Post
    I have my students study 9/11 every semester for a brief period, as part of a course on criminal law, regarding terrorism. Not one of them has ever come back saying the towers were demolished by explosives.

    Probably because they have more than 4 brain cells to rub together.

    I have a theory that I think any sensible person would agree has just as much credibility as the thought that thousands of people who worked in WTC simply ignored the demolition wiring going on around them, and that hundreds of workers who did the demolition wiring have all remained silent for a decade:

    Attachment 12354
    Who said anything about wiring??? I believe the nano t was mixed in with the paint, and the crew happily painted it on. They never knew what they were painting on. See how that works? It's called compartmentalization. Happens all the time in the world of espionage.

  2. Stand Taller and Look Better with the LUMOback Posture and Activity Coach. <LINK> Learn More Here! </LINK>

  3. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RtWngaFraud View Post
    Who said anything about wiring??? I believe the nano t was mixed in with the paint, and the crew happily painted it on. They never knew what they were painting on. See how that works? It's called compartmentalization. Happens all the time in the world of espionage.
    How would it be ignited?
    This Speech is my recital.

  4. #13

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hannibal View Post
    How would it be ignited?
    plus mixing the thermite with an inert carrier like paintwould lessen the effectivness......besides,why paint the thermite on,and then spray fire retardant right over it?
    Out to the road,out 'neath the stars,feelin' the breeze,passing the cars.....

  5. #14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RtWngaFraud View Post
    Who said anything about wiring??? I believe the nano t was mixed in with the paint, and the crew happily painted it on. They never knew what they were painting on. See how that works? It's called compartmentalization. Happens all the time in the world of espionage.
    Ah. Truther ignorance exposing itself once again. How does nano thermite work? Through heat. The byproduct of any kind of thermite is superheated molten iron. The layer of paint needed to actually do anything would be MASSIVE!!!

    And then let's look at the other falacy of the truther lie of nano thermite paint. Why does nano thermite react better than regular thermite? Because the particles are smaller and the reaction can happen faster. Mix it in paint and guess what you've done. You've completely FUBARed the reaction between the iron oxide and the aluminum no matter HOW small the particles are because the particles are not together. Why else do you think not a single truther has been able to demonstrate nano thermite paint? Yet despite this evidence they can't refute, truthers will continue to pretend any bull(*)(*)(*)(*) they dream up is what really happened including the fantasy that is nano thermite paint.

  6. Default

    How does nano thermite work?
    Heat applied to the iron oxide releases the oxygen from the molecule which is free to bond with the aluminum. The product is iron and aluminum oxide. The overall reaction is exothermic so the heat of the reaction precipitates the release of more oxygen. The reaction continues until the supply of iron oxide is exhausted, or the heat of the reaction dips below the temperature needed to release more oxygen.

    A thin layer of thermite coating a large mass of iron could not maintain the heat of reaction for a significant period of time. The iron, being conductive, would conduct the heat away from the reaction.

    Someone who coated a beam with a paint thin layer of thermite would notice that the reaction would be contained within a short distance of the point of ignition, as the heat of ignition would be rapidly dissipated through the mass of the beam.

    That being said, RWF. Who are these people that painted these beams? Can you located any of them? Who added the thermite to the paint? Who ignited the paint and how was it ignited?
    Last edited by Fangbeer; Apr 28 2012 at 07:43 AM.
    A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep

  7. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RtWngaFraud View Post
    Who said anything about wiring??? I believe the nano t was mixed in with the paint, and the crew happily painted it on. They never knew what they were painting on. See how that works? It's called compartmentalization. Happens all the time in the world of espionage.
    Actually, what I see is called "speculation".

    It happens a lot when there is no evidence to support a claim.
    How nice it would be if everyone judged their party by the same high standards that they use to judge the other party.

  8. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RtWngaFraud View Post
    Well, the goobment could refute these claims and offer up what "really" happened. We say controlled demolition. We say nanothermite was found. What's the "official" rebuttal? Believe me, if they had one, they'd sure as s*it use it., but, they don't. Anytime, some "official" wants to take to the press, the airwaves, the tv...hey...we'll all be watchin'. Bring it on.They won't do that though, because the speculation and the misinformation continually swirls and keeps the truth smokey, which plays to the criminal's advantage. Best to just say nothing, and so they don't.
    So....we'll step up and teach, if the goobment is not willing to.
    A person has no responsibility to refute obvious nonsense. Suggesting the government needs to "refute" 9/11 deniers is like saying historians need to "refute" every kook in an asylum that thinks they're Elvis or Napoleon. Everyone who's sane knows they're not really Elvis, and anyone who thinks they are won't listen to reason no matter how you tell them.

    Quote Originally Posted by RtWngaFraud View Post
    Who said anything about wiring???
    You did, when you suggested "controlled demolition," which requires ignition of some sort.
    I believe the nano t was mixed in with the paint, and the crew happily painted it on. They never knew what they were painting on. See how that works? It's called compartmentalization. Happens all the time in the world of espionage.
    And when did this take place? And why has no one come forward to say they "painted" the beams? How were beams painted that were behind walls? How does any substance burn sideways, as would be necessary to shear vertical beams?

    twoofer deflection in 3... 2... 1...
    twitter.com/BullsLawDan <~ My Twitter (may be NSFW). Follow me!

    "But it wasn't until he met his beautiful wife that he learned using logic and reason isn't enough. You have to be a dick to everyone who doesn't think like you." - South Park on Richard Dawkins

  9. #18

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fangbeer View Post
    Heat applied to the iron oxide releases the oxygen from the molecule which is free to bond with the aluminum. The product is iron and aluminum oxide. The overall reaction is exothermic so the heat of the reaction precipitates the release of more oxygen. The reaction continues until the supply of iron oxide is exhausted, or the heat of the reaction dips below the temperature needed to release more oxygen.

    A thin layer of thermite coating a large mass of iron could not maintain the heat of reaction for a significant period of time. The iron, being conductive, would conduct the heat away from the reaction.

    Someone who coated a beam with a paint thin layer of thermite would notice that the reaction would be contained within a short distance of the point of ignition, as the heat of ignition would be rapidly dissipated through the mass of the beam.

    That being said, RWF. Who are these people that painted these beams? Can you located any of them? Who added the thermite to the paint? Who ignited the paint and how was it ignited?
    Who authorized sending anthrax to US Senators? This poison came from a US military installation....Lot of unanswered questions...

  10. #19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jack4freedom View Post
    Who authorized sending anthrax to US Senators? This poison came from a US military installation....Lot of unanswered questions...
    Really? Seems to me you already think you know the answers. Care to share your evidence?

  11. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jack4freedom View Post
    Who authorized sending anthrax to US Senators? This poison came from a US military installation....Lot of unanswered questions...
    Why do 'truthers' change the subject when backed into a corner?
    This Speech is my recital.

+ Reply to Thread
+ Post New Thread
Page 2 of 9 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks