NASA refuses to ISS for the sake of the Moon

Discussion in 'Conspiracy Theories' started by Destroyer of illusions, Dec 10, 2015.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Destroyer of illusions

    Destroyer of illusions Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2014
    Messages:
    16,104
    Likes Received:
    2,371
    Trophy Points:
    113
    [​IMG]

    Dear friends, I saw a very funny article with the statement of the representative of NASA. Apparently designed for the weak-minded sheep who cries - "we are an exceptional nation".

    http://www.ctrlhelp.com/nasa-refuses-to-iss-for-the-sake-of-the-moon.html

    In other words - NASA could not. Nothing could not - nor create a vehicle for flight to the ISS, or ISS to develop itself. Now will invite Hollywood?
    Note - as a space project in which NASA want to invest money balances, called the "bring people into the orbit of the Moon." Do not land on the moon - and deliver in orbit. You understand the difference? "Flight of the orbit" in which case you can all draw on the computer and shoot a film in pavilions.
    Question. On what will fly? Need bad, but still a rocket. And now, not 60s, in orbit a heap of any non-American and non-Russian satellites. Forgery will be seen immediately. Missiles capable of deliver bulky cargo into lunar orbit, the Americans have not. So the NASA statement - fake from the beginning to the end. For the idiots.
    In fact, everything is simple - ISS project has a reserve of vitality it until 2024 with a possible extension for 5 years, but not anymore. Russia is building a new ISS is not going at all - Russia denied the Americans. She said - Americans, build themselves. But United States do ISS themselves, of course, can not. Here and twisted, like, not very much and wanted. To lie them are not used to.

    What do you think about it?
     
  2. Alucard

    Alucard New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2015
    Messages:
    7,828
    Likes Received:
    41
    Trophy Points:
    0
    In my opinion, I wish NASA would discontinue until our problems right here on Earth are solved.
     
  3. cerberus

    cerberus Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2015
    Messages:
    25,530
    Likes Received:
    5,363
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I wish NASA would discontinue! [​IMG]

    God they're getting soooo boring!
     
  4. Dutch

    Dutch Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2010
    Messages:
    46,383
    Likes Received:
    15,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    :wall:
     
  5. AlphaOmega

    AlphaOmega Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2013
    Messages:
    28,747
    Likes Received:
    4,821
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Im seeing one of those problems now and it doesnt look like it will ever be solved.
     
  6. Dutch

    Dutch Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2010
    Messages:
    46,383
    Likes Received:
    15,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Really....
     
  7. AlphaOmega

    AlphaOmega Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2013
    Messages:
    28,747
    Likes Received:
    4,821
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well Im wrong actually, that problem will end if ISIS takes over and starts throwing them off rooftops. Even then I dont think they would see the problem even on the way down. You cant fix stupid.
     
  8. Gilos

    Gilos Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2011
    Messages:
    14,163
    Likes Received:
    730
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That will never happen, IMO NASA inspires the entire world, it may well be the most significant legacy of the USA.
     
  9. BestViewedWithCable

    BestViewedWithCable Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2010
    Messages:
    48,288
    Likes Received:
    6,966
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think youre getting bad information from the politburo.

    NASA doesnt do "space" anymore.

    Obama has retasked NASA to focus on muslim outreach.

    Sorry if this info comes as a shock to you, but many here in America were just as dismayed as you, when we heard the news.

    REF:
    [video=youtube;tCn10YWsY1Q]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tCn10YWsY1Q[/video]
     
  10. Destroyer of illusions

    Destroyer of illusions Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2014
    Messages:
    16,104
    Likes Received:
    2,371
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I do not speak English. So I do not understand what is said on the video. Write me briefly about your video.
     
  11. BestViewedWithCable

    BestViewedWithCable Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2010
    Messages:
    48,288
    Likes Received:
    6,966
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Thats the director of NASA saying, Obama has retasked NASA to focus on muslim outreach.
     
  12. Destroyer of illusions

    Destroyer of illusions Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2014
    Messages:
    16,104
    Likes Received:
    2,371
    Trophy Points:
    113
    To solve the problems of the earth enough to rename the "White House" - in the "madhouse". And isolate him inhabitants from society. Certainly clothe oneself them in "straitjacket". You will be surprised - how quickly disappear many problems.
     
  13. Destroyer of illusions

    Destroyer of illusions Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2014
    Messages:
    16,104
    Likes Received:
    2,371
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Clear. Thank you. I agree with you. Cannibals need more blood.
     
  14. tecoyah

    tecoyah Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 15, 2008
    Messages:
    28,370
    Likes Received:
    9,297
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    As your communication ability is extremely limited and confusing I am left to make assumptions about what you are trying to say. From what I can understand you are indicating that NASA is making things up in order to compensate for the Shuttle retirement and stating that Russia is building a space station that the U.S is not allowed on.

    If I am correct I have a few points I would like to make.

    1) NASA is primarily partnering with private companies for basic resupply of the ISS and these companies are likely to provide transport of humans relatively soon.
    2) Russia does not have the capital or the technology required to build a space station.
    3) Space conspiracy theory is a very quick way to be seen as "out there".
     
  15. MrFirst

    MrFirst Banned Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2008
    Messages:
    3,010
    Likes Received:
    533
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Nice joke.
     
  16. Destroyer of illusions

    Destroyer of illusions Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2014
    Messages:
    16,104
    Likes Received:
    2,371
    Trophy Points:
    113
    1. We seen repeatedly how "work" private space programs. It was really funny.
    2. Russia is the only country in the world that has the technology for the construction of the ISS. US does not have an independent technology for construction ISS. Do not forget - the world's first International Space Station was built by the Soviet Union. Called - station "Mir".

    You should stop watching Western media. They are bad for the brain.
     
  17. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,323
    Likes Received:
    858
    Trophy Points:
    113
  18. DarkDaimon

    DarkDaimon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2010
    Messages:
    5,546
    Likes Received:
    1,568
    Trophy Points:
    113

Share This Page