And here with your comment we have an example the racism of the left on full display. The left pushes gun control to disarm black people. Black women are the fastest growing demographic of black gun owners. So better accept that fact. The Lt. Gov of VA is a conservative black woman who has served in the military (Marine), run a business, is a licensed Electrician and like your man Obama is articulate and clean. As a Marine you can be sure she knows how to use that AR. Unlike the black people you like she is not dependent on welfare from the Dem plantation. If not for the naturalized citizen issue, I would like to vote for her in the future as a GOP President or Vice President candidate. She will make a great VA Gov. and then Senator. As a final comment, with your demanding people prove negatives you should start posting in the religion forum.
You make a false claim. I have something to offer. See below. Not impressed by your world argumentum ad populum fallacy. Liberals in the rest of the world are free to flee their home if a home invasion occurs or toot on their rape whistles if attacked. A proposed solution for murders.
Demographics. Liberals use the term "industrial countries" as a code word for demographics just like they use the terms "good schools", "good neighborhoods". etc. as code words.
I think this quote is aprapos with respect to your comment. There is a reason communists and (being redundant) progressives push gun control. And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?… The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin’s thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If…if…We didn’t love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation…. We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.” ― Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn , The Gulag Archipelago 1918–1956 –
First of all, they don't have such porous borders and secondly, they have more accessible and affordable mental health care. Thanks,
You never asked me if there are people around who want to ban all guns, but just assume I think there are no such people around for the sake to call me ignorant. All in all, you keep on resorting to personal attacking me. I already commented that the way the UK did it, can not be applied in the US since it's not compatible with the US constitution. I do note that you're not responding to my idea's of gun registration and licensing. By that, you're giving us all the feeling that you can't handle my idea's.
So the majority of our crime and gun problems can be traced to illegal immigration? I do agree about the mental health care. Single payer health insurance would be a big step to solving that problem.
criminals cannot be prosecuted under the fifth amendment for failing to register weapons. registration has no value on preventing crime
The German Nazis and their allies in places like France, Poland, Austria and Ukraine murdered over 6 million Jews and many others as well. If one out of ten of those murdered had shot a nazi before being gassed, shot or starved to death, the Third Reich would not have lasted until 1945
Exactly. They always compare white countries to The United States. None of those countries have 30 million+ illegal aliens running loose. Hell, we have more illegal aliens than Canada has people.
It has value. Since the gun when given, lend, rented, sold etc etc to somebody who can not be registered because of his criminal past, it should mean that the gun remains registered under the name of the previous owner. And so when the criminal gets busted with a weapon it may not have, it also means the previous owner gets busted with arming a person who it knows it may not have a weapon. So this is not about punishing the person pulling the trigger for failing to register. This is about punishing people arming criminals, and lose their rights to register. With that, you curb where criminals can get guns from people who legally may have them. I think we're all in favor or punishing people arming criminals. But there is you....
correct but Democrats just plan on appointing justices who will pretend that the second amendment doesn't protect private citizens
Yes, you want to shift the burden of proof from the prosecution to the accused. The person most needing punishment is the criminal with the gun. Many on the left seem to think that person is the least capable of the two
Re: I'm not so sure that the majority of America's violent gun related crimes can be blamed on illegal immigration as I think that violent criminals are being released onto our streets prematurely. I'm glad we agree that America's mental health system needs attention. Enjoy your Thanksgiving...