‘Decisions are imminent’ on charges in Trump’s effort to overturn 2020 election

She was naturally taken aback by the question, as she is a woman. It is an insulting question on it's face, and in fact, a disingenuous question.

In the same shoes, I would have been stunned as well had I been her, that a US senator could ask such a disingenuous question.

And it is a disingenuous question, because that IS NOT what republicans are asking.

What republicans are really asking is 'what is your view on women with penises'.

But Republicans do not have the gonads to ask the lady supreme court justice appointee that one. (Is that a pun?)

But, I will say that I do agree with conservatives on that point, that women with penises are effeminate males, and like Seinfeld has often claimed,

"There is nothing wrong with that".

 

You know very well that was is imminent to the government is not the same as imminent to you and me.

 

Way to cover your bases. Lol

 

Fake news. It was a ridiculous answer, but given the pretzel that the Left has worked themselves into, she lied.

'Alvin Bragg Isn't Just A Hyper-Partisan Political Hack Doing The Dirty Work Of The Democrat Junta...He's Stupid And A Lousy Lawyer Too!'

Actually, good old lying Alvin is a preppy, 'Nine months after Democrat apparatchik and Soros fluffer Alvin Bragg got bitch-slapped over the ridiculous murder charges filed against bodega worker Jose Alba, he has doubled down with an even more ridiculous charge...'

I guess he ran out of Ham Sandwiches and Trumps to indict.

 

Back on the Georgia topic, many of the people I watch and follow seem to be gearing for the first week in May for charging decisions coming out of Georgia.

Part of that is related to the seating of the indicting Grand Jury, but I can't find any articles with Deets...

 

Plus, Willis may be weighing RICO charges. Whether she goes with those or not, that's going to slow things down a bit for an indictment decision.

 

Imminent is imminent.......................

 

all this over a word? Jeezus **** you guys need to take a chill pill.

How about 'and some, I assume, are nice people'.

How about 'I can grab women's p*ssies because I"m a celeb'.

You guys are a trip.

 

ROFL LAO we weren't the ones about to have an orgasm because we thought that indictment was IMMINENT!

Is this where you divert now.

 

What is insulting and disingenuous about such a simple question on which she may have to issue rulings? Why should she have been "taken aback" by it?

 

If you can't see it, then your problem is obvious.

 

I mean, he's been indicted(though under seal) but I imagine his attorney's(the few that are left) have been informed of the charges. Trump's going to have to go through the system, like anyone else charged with a crime.

 

Did I state otherwise? Btw, the above has nothing to do with what I wrote to another poster. Perhaps a quick review is in order?

 

If you do then your problem is BLARINGLY obvious. I see you are no more capable than she to do so.

 

ROFLMFAO to
Says the person who started the thread........how rich

 

The irony is delicious.

 

That (statement by him) made me do a double take. :lol

 

Of course it is against posting rules to tell people not to post in a thread but it is especially rich with the


Patricio Da Silva said: ↑

 

"Imminent" ehh?

 

Better to get it right than to get it quick

 

Pretty sure the grand jury only meets every other month. Meaning only one instance has passed. It will meet again in May.

 

See above post.

 

Pretty sure they meet much more than that and the imminent was imminent.

 

The regular grand jury in Georgia serves for two months before being replaced by the next regular grand jury, which serves for two months, etc. etc. If she's wanting to get this in front of the regular grand jury, the next one meets in May.

 

Why can't she get in on the March GJ then?

No cuts? What's going on in Fulton County that's more important?