How can we "cooperate" with a religion/book that says to "fight them until all worship is for Allah" (i.e. fight us until all the world falls under the jack boot of Islamic Sharia Law)!? Let's see what type of "cooperation" you get from them.
What, you mean saying what actually happened (CHILDREN TARGETED) ? And if you think the people in question are going to magically respond to 'brotherhood and cooperation', you're bananas. There is no fool more dangerous than the vain fool.
I bet that you don't have the SLIGHTEST idea (no offense) just how evil certain parts of the Islamic texts really are (in all fairness to you, MOST people don't....but someone like crank does, as an example, however.) But hopefully I'm dead wrong - so to test this, please tell us the 3 very worst things in the Islamic texts, off the top of your head. Thanks. We await your learned answer. (If you balk, then you'll be telling us everything we need to know about you, by the way.)
No, saying that "Islam" targeted them. I made that clear in my post. Most Muslims will respond to brotherhood and cooperation, and you're going to need their help to solve the problem of Islamic terrorism.
Don't you dare tell the TRUTH about Islam, crank...don't you know that!!!??? /sarc off. Yes, great post. Love Muslims, question Islam.
Urban legend. Donald Trump cites dubious legend about Gen. Pershing, pig's blood and Muslims Pershing the Thought FALSE The Real Story Behind Donald Trump's Pig's Blood Slander In short, utter BS. Nothing but masturbatory fantasy material for neo-cons. NEXT!
But with the Islamic promise of "72 virgins" to rape (a quota of sex-partners = rape!), in the highest part of Jannah no less(!), and guaranteed entry (and avoiding hell), of course "Islam" has something to do with this. FAITH is what leads one to believe things like this in the first place (no sane person, not using faith, would believe that god would pick a pedophile as his single greatest role model for all time....seriously!) Religions don't have FACTS, so they HAVE to rely on faith. Faith is harmful - as we've seen in England today.
The killing of apostates. The death penalty for unfaithful women. The punishment of homosexuality. I am fully aware of all the problems that Islam and, more importantly, Islamic culture have. If you think that the way forward is to blame Islam or Muslims for each and every Islamic terrorist attack you WILL fail to find a useful way forward. That, unfortunately, is the path I think Europe might take.
Clutch those pearls any tighter and you're going to choke, Millicent. You might even give yourself a full-blown case of the vapors...
You might be right. But if, hypothetically speaking, if, it would help save just one victim of future Islamic terrorism (to threaten Muslims with being buried in pig's blood if they commit deadly terrorism), would you be for that? Or is religious sensibilities more of a priority to you than saving the lives of innocent, completely innocent, non-Muslims? Please tell us.
I was wrong about you - I'm impressed with you now. However, some solution is needed for Muslims to REFORM Islam....blaming Islam might not be the best way, I'll admit - but no one seems to be coming up with better ways. It's possible that Muslims will abandon Islam if Islam becomes to toxic, so discredited, that it's seen on par with, say, Nazism, etc.
Because of this I'm sure that each and every gay-rights group in America has defeating Islam as it's #1 goal....which would make sense if the world was a sane place.
You're mistaking the calling out of a lie with religious sensitivity. I would advocate publicly spit-roasting a convicted terrorist in his home town, in front of his family, and serving him up with poi if it would discourage the next idiot from following his path. Unfortunately, those kinds of tactics have never been proven to work.
If this was an Islamist suicide bomber, then Islam did target children. How many years have you spent living under Sh'aria law, in Muslim nations? Just curious to know your level of access to what these people really think about the west.
They don't need to do any of that, they simply need to end ALL IMMIGRATION from a qualified list of nations. Plus that other stuff
Snopes Snopes relies on the internet 100% for their sources. It's not on the internet dude and most historians refuse to touch the subject. Explains why very little has been written about the Philippine Insurrection. A small war that had about the same number of casualties as the war in Iraq. US Army War College 122 Forbes Ave. Carlisle, PA 17013
From what I can tell this attack was not on, say, the symbol of the Crusader (Washington's Capital Building, or the White House, or Pentagon, etc. like some of the planned targets on 9/11), etc., but just on plain old young people that had no particular anti-Islam stance at all!? If they'd bombed, say, Robert Spencer's offices, or Geller's home, etc., I could at least understand their (twisted, but understandable) logic....but a music concert packed with innocent "youts"!? What will they bomb next, an orphanage?
That won't work either. The only thing to do is remain distant. Geographically and philosophically. Don't import it, don't pander to it, and don't allow ANY concessions for it once in the west. Also, the internet isn't going to help dismantle the faith in the same way it has Christianity. This is so much more than just religion. It's an absolute, all-encompassing culture.
crank, as an atheist, are you TORN - torn that ALLOWING Muslim immigration will help speed up the eventual end of faith - as this will hasten the clash of civilizations, thereby helping bring religion/faith to it's end sooner than when the "price of faith" was not as high (such as in the old days when Muslims lived in their own little segregated world, and Christians lived in their own little segregated world, and religion was less of a problem)?