22 Israelis murdered 180 wounded during the last two months

but only Arabs living in Israel.

not in Gaza or the West Bank.

 

Direct your questions to the UN who made Palestine a state.

That's absolutely nuts.
International law does not allow ethnic cleansing through compensation. Ethnic cleansing is a war crime. It trashes civil rights, the Geneva Conventions, the UN Charter etc etc etc... hence them settlements are illegal. Israel and it's Jews who are behind that are in the wrong. While no war criminal has the right to go forth with what they are doing but do make themselves to be a target... civilians or not, and dont stand next to them.

 

It's only states Arabs there as "owner", and does not specify where such owner live. As I arleady showed you.

 

You claim that "Palestine" is a state by reinforcing it with the vote of the UN. Hence, if it is your claim then the question needs to be directed to you.

So are you saying that the low forbid that a country will pay compensations to "refugees"?

 

Israel refuses to pay compensation for lost land in Israel, to Arabs in the West Bank and Gaza.

 

It's not a claim.. it's fact just like the sun comes up. The UN made it so, hence direct your questions to them.

I am saying international law forbids ethnic cleansing.
There are no ifs and buts to that.

That is international law,.. just like they explained them settlements are illegal.

 

Not according to your source (Wiki).

 

The persons entitled to compensation are all those who were Israel residents on 1 July 1973

 

If it is a fact that everyone knows, then you need to know as well. Hence, what are the borders of such state?

And still Israel provideda chence for compensations for the Arabs. As I showed you.

Not according to International law. As I showed you erlier.

 

Only Arabs who were residents of Israel in 1973, may sue for compensation for land lost inside Israel.

"The persons entitled to compensation are all those who were Israel residents on 1 July 1973"

 

According to your source:

As you can see, The Absentees Property Law, according to your linked included laws from 1950, 1953. 1958, 1965, 1967 and 1973. Hence the Absantees Property Law is including laws not only about 1973, but also erlier ones that even referred to Arabs form 1948.

 

the compensation law says in order to sue for compensation for lost land inside Israel:

"The persons entitled to compensation are all those who were Israel residents on 1 July 1973"

- - - Updated - - -

only if they lived in Israel in 1973

 

Please stop repeating yourself. I already replied to such claim in my last comment. Please read: http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=433636&page=64&p=1065661875#post1065661875

- - - Updated - - -

Not according to the Absantees Property Law, as I showed you above.

 

you didn't reply, you denied the actual text of the law, which says:

"The persons entitled to compensation are all those who were Israel residents on 1 July 1973"

 

I only read what your source wrote about the Absentee Property Law. According to your source:

As you can see, The Absentees Property Law, according to your linked included laws from 1950, 1953. 1958, 1965, 1967 and 1973. Hence the Absantees Property Law is including laws not only about 1973, but also erlier ones that even referred to Arabs form 1948.

 

yes, but the law about compensation for lost land says:

"The persons entitled to compensation are all those who were Israel residents on 1 July 1973"

 

The compensations that Israel offered were written in the Absentee Property Law that include laws from 1950, 1953, 1958, 1965, 1967 and 1973.

 

and yet you have zero actual text that contradicts the compensation rules that I posted.

 

Just because I know the sun comes up, doesn't mean I know why. The UN made Palestine a nation, it's a fact.
FYI the borders of Israel have also been determined by the UN, making the Golan the WB including east Jerusalem not part of it.

irrelevant. Ethnic cleansing is still a war crime. It can't be justified with sweet words or money. Just like.. let me exterminate some Jews and give 3 bucks in compensation to make that war crime "right". Please end your incredible foolish troll ranting.

 

Your source specify under the Absentee Property Law, Laws from 1950, 1953, 1958, 1965, 1967 and 1973, which all of them specify that Israel offer compenstations .

The line:

Was written in the laws frm 1973 that been icnluded in the Absentee Property Law. But I provided to you a qoute from Land Acquisition (Validation of Acts and Compensation) Law from 1953 and not 1973, which related to people even from 1949.

 

No thats nonsense

 

So if you can't validate your claim, why are you continue to claim it?

And still, it doesnt contradict that Israel provided a chence for compensations for the Arabs.

 

but not for Arabs in the West Bank and Gaza who lost land inside Israel

 

They are a non UN-member state. That makes it a sate.

 

you provided no quote contradicting my quote.

I win and you lose.