911 World Trade Center Tower "Collapse", a new "Demolition" Euphemism!

You obviously don't.

 

"....and cutter charges ripping through the side of #2 a couple posts up? You do recognize the difference between explosive demolition and collapse dont you?"

What were the "cutter charges" used? and where the evidence of what was used? Why do you ignore the obvious damage caused by the plane crashes? Why do you ignore the damaged beams that were found in the rubble?


And as usual, why do you agree a pumpkin can be shot through both sided of a boat but a AA Jetline cant penetrate the side of the WTC?

 

Obvious damage by a plane?
WTF is that?
Or just more of your imagination that you have no intention to show.

all the "beams" were damaged. DUH

Ok so appear to be disputing that we witnessed a demolition by explosives, hence you do not know what a demolition looks like.

Why the show why didnt you just say you need help because you do not know?

- - - Updated - - -

usually columns exploding mid air and brusting into flames mid air and being destroyed mid air is a good sign that its not a natural "collapse". capice

 

what an assinine response, there were no forensic tests DUH

Only a nutter would ask for tests that were not done.

the video clearly shows demolition. sorry

 

So much for your evidence....nothing.

Panels and beams had serial number...Investigators knew what beams/panels came from where. They were identified and their damage was unique to the other beams and panels in the debris. DUH.

Been to 3 controlled demolition in the New England are since 1985...I know exactly what they look like....and they don't start at the top. Second, the demolition industry experts dispute your claim....and ImplosionWorld, the industry's leading trade mag, says you and "experts" don't know what you're taking about:

http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC STUDY 8-06 w clarif as of 9-8-06 .pdf

Once again, you're left holding you junk.

 

No, it shows no such thing. It shows the tower bulge at on point, buckle and then tip to the left...and then fail. No explosions and NO EXPLOSIVE MATERIAL FOUND.

So why do you continue to post lies?

 

ImplosionWorld says you know idea what you're posting about...NONE.

http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC STUDY 8-06 w clarif as of 9-8-06 .pdf

 

and which one was made to look like a natural collapse?

ZERO NADA

You have no clue how to rig a building to look like a natural collapse or the necessary equipment to get the job done.

Just more of your illogical belches and beer farts.

- - - Updated - - -

really what do they say?

- - - Updated - - -

(*)(*)(*)(*) loads of videos showing explosions and audio that you can hear the explosions. Doesnt do much good if you dont know what you are looking for. Thats an ongoing problem with troughers. They always come to a gun fight with a toothpick.

yes of course it bulged after they lit it up LOL

thats what explosives do!

 

Would you like me to point out the stupidity in your statement or can you see it for yourself?

 

yeh print out anything you like, but good luck when its my turn.

 

"really what do they say?"

Did you even bother to read the report??? If you did, you wouldn't be asking that question.

 

what did who say?

tell them to post their argument.

Oh you dont understand it is that it? LMAO

 

it would not make sense to run charges up to the 98 th floor to try to knock down a building..once those charges go off then you would need a second primer cord and new charges for the 97th floor..and same for every floor..so you would have a total of 98 seperate primer cords and charges....hell if you wanted to knock it down just take out the bottom floor first and the whole tower comes down....and yes i do blasting about three times a month

 

Sadly,no,he can't...or won't.

 

I know.

 

hell i am still waiting for koko to do the simple math equation i started him on to see how much each floor weighs..he gave up on just the first part..its has three levels...he knew these then it would made more sense to him..

 

I've come to see koko as much like a nine year old kid....tell him something and he screams back 'Nuh-UH!!'

 

NO NO NO (*)(*)(*)(*)ing NO

you do not need primer cord and all that old outdated (*)(*)(*)(*).

Sure it makes sense, it may not make sense to you, which is different. Otherwise it most certainly makes perfect sense. In fact its the only way they could do what they did.

- - - Updated - - -

yeh not more you can say to people who do not get it and never will.

- - - Updated - - -

Like who gives a hit what a floor weighed?

What do you think you are going to prove with thatphd level knowledge when all the troughers are still in the stone age.

 

Actually, you do, unless you are using radio-actuated detonators and no explosives tech in the world is going to risk getting literally hoist on his own petard setting radio-actuated primers next to all that broadcasting gear and hundreds of cell phones, even after hours. Do learn how these things work.

Actually, you are not getting it. You are arguing with people who have some experience with this stuff.

The weight of each floor is a factor in the energy available to do the work of destroying the next floor down. There was more potential energy in each floor than in all the explosives that could be packed into the building without leaving a clear explosive signature that would have been audible in Buffalo.

 

Are you too much of a coward to read this short .pdf that highlights the foolishness of your argument?

http://www.implosionworld.com/Articl...09-8-06 .pdf

 

if you had a clue you wouldnt be flashing that in front of me, but be my guest, if you think you got a point to make from it take your best shot! WAITING!

 

We are still waiting for you to prove that high explosives could do any of the things you claim they did without being visible and audible as they were detonated.

 

Actually, you do, unless you are using radio-actuated detonators and no explosives tech in the world is going to risk getting literally hoist on his own petard setting radio-actuated primers next to all that broadcasting gear and hundreds of cell phones, even after hours. Do learn how these things work.

Actually you dont, and you have just proven to me that you dont know (*)(*)(*)(*) about radio either.

Actually, you are not getting it. You are arguing with people who have some experience with this stuff.

and only a fool underestimates his adversary

The weight of each floor is a factor

maybe maybe not.

in the energy available to do the work of destroying the next floor down. There was more potential energy in each floor than in all the explosives that could be packed into the building without leaving a clear explosive signature that would have been audible in Buffalo.

and you know nothing about all the available materials for dropping a building, like your trougher friends living in the stone age.

 

First "I" never said or limited it to "HIGH EXPLOSIVES" you did. However as we can see some were used.

Otherwise been there done that but troughers are too cluless to know what they are looking at and otherwise in denial so its a waste trying to prove anything. It only has value in sadistic pleasure of showing the world how psychopathic and orwellian troughers really are.



you claim to have all that experience and prove you have none.

 

[video=youtube;v1PBptSDIh8]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v1PBptSDIh8[/video]

..........