911 World Trade Center Tower "Collapse", a new "Demolition" Euphemism!

Discussion in '9/11' started by Kokomojojo, May 19, 2013.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Keep running, boy. Your lies keep pace with you.
     
  2. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    10,770
    Likes Received:
    3,769
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If I can click it, it's clearly there.
     
  3. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yeah, okay. Try years 2005,2006 and look for 911. Tell me how many you find.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Well, I say your lies are way out of sync with you boss. Speak truth, and I'll consider conversing with you sometime. Till then, I'm done so, continue your baiting comments if you like, and enjoy your obsession over me but, my amusement with you has come to an end.
     
  4. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    In that I've only been a member on this board since 2009, why would you look THAT far back for something you claim I said?

    For that matter, you've only been a member for 2 years, so this whole 'not available past 2 years' excuse is just more dodgeballing .
     
  5. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    10,770
    Likes Received:
    3,769
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What does that have to do with how many are missing? Specifically which information are you claiming is missing? Do you know a thread title from 2005 that isn't there?
     
  6. carloslebaron

    carloslebaron New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2013
    Messages:
    726
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So, the several computer simulations, and the comments made by "experts" comparing the demolition of other buildings with the falling of the Twin Towers, are practically wrong.

    The Twin Towers were built different than the rest of buildings.

    The traditional construction with welding of beams and columns, and pouring concrete on floors and walls making the structure more solid, were replaced by a different method that was jointing the beams and columns with bolts, and adding pre-fabricated floors and platforms to the structure.

    The Twin Towers were practically two gigantic Lego toys. No wonder they weren't capable to hold the pressure from the floors above the hit of the airplanes.

    If the Twin Towers were built "the traditional way" then they should hold the floors from above the airplanes hit. The remodeling should be made on the affected upper floors and no big catastrophe should happened.

    The falling of the Twin Towers can't be blamed on the terrorists, because they themselves never imagined that such a falling should happens.

    The only ones to blame for the falling of the Twin Towers are the ones who designed and built the towers.
     
  7. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    They can't be blamed either.....Ramzi Yousef planned on toppling the wtc with the first bombing in the 90's,but didn't quite do it.
     
  8. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Oh boy...The lies get bigger. You were here since at least 2006, and probably prior to that. Have you no shame?

    - - - Updated - - -

    Things are missing., pertaining to 911. You figure it out.
     
  9. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Join Date: Aug 17 2009
     
  10. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Evidently Fraud can't be bothered to investigate,but is willing to throw accusations willy-nilly.
     
  11. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Oye vay...what BS. I've been wasting my time with you way prior to 2009 boss.

    I've been wasting time with you far longer than 2009. I know, you know it, and you lie about it. I am 100% completely done with you boss. I kept hoping some honesty would sneak out if I was persistent it but, not happening. It only deepens so, enjoy your kingdom. You and your minions have this place locked down so tight that no truth could ever escape its grip.

    I can only hope than when you're old and grey, you'll have a grandchild or some other small child ask you why you defended what you did after it's well known what actually happened, and I can only hope you feel shame.

    Bye boss. Your gull is beyond incredible, and not worth the effort it takes to respond to your nonsense. It's your forum again.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Minions.
     
  12. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    http://www.politicalforum.com/members/rtwngafraud.html

    Join Date: Feb 16 2011

    The evidence says otherwise, 'Fraud.

    - - - Updated - - -

    [​IMG]
     
  13. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
    It's 2013, so that's 3 1/2 years of dealing with you, which in dog years is about 22 years. Feels about right. I think Einstein said something about time dilation. The closer one is the Fraud's gravitational mass, the slower time runs.
     
  14. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    well Gull-ey!
     
  15. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,740
    Likes Received:
    1,803
    Trophy Points:
    113
    huge chunks of steel bursting into flames in mid air!


    [​IMG]
     
  16. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    (eyeroll):roll:
     
  17. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,740
    Likes Received:
    1,803
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Must be a horrible thing to face, murdering so many innocent muslims and stealing their oil.
     
  18. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    funny thing is,I've never killed anyone,let alone a mooooslim and whose oil was 'stolen' anyway?
     
  19. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Huge chunks of stupidity repackaged as BULSH claims by the Twoofers.
     
  20. plague311

    plague311 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2012
    Messages:
    1,256
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    This doesn't make any sense, and I have no idea what someone would say that the falling of the Twins towers should be blamed on the engineers\architects. First off, the buildings would be standing just fine if some crazy, religious fanatics didn't fly planes into them. Secondly, the buildings absorbed the impact of 2 fully loaded Boeing jets, and stood tall for an hour with unfought, burning fires raging inside.

    I would say that, structurally, they were built great.
     
  21. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    From all reports, had these buildings been built using the traditional technology of that time, rather than this newer design, these tower would have collapsed much sooner. IT'S BECAUSE THESE TOWERS WERE BUILT THE WAY THE WERE, THAT ALLOWED AS MANY PEOPLE THE TIME TO ESCAPE.
     
  22. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,740
    Likes Received:
    1,803
    Trophy Points:
    113
    yeh but unfortunately they were not built to withstand well placed cutter charges.


    [​IMG]
     
  23. tecoyah

    tecoyah Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 15, 2008
    Messages:
    28,370
    Likes Received:
    9,297
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Something to consider:

    [video=youtube;dsjfSG69Pik]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsjfSG69Pik[/video]
     
  24. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,740
    Likes Received:
    1,803
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Why would anyone take that seriously when we can see steel bursting into flames and exploding in mid air.

    ....and cutter charges ripping through the side of #2 a couple posts up? You do recognize the difference between explosive demolition and collapse dont you?


    [​IMG]
     
  25. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yeah in the Nutter world where you don't have to prove your Nutter claims. Well, here in Reality you do, you can't and your haven't. There is absolutely no forensic proof of any explosive materials.

    Nutters lose again.
     

Share This Page