A Pizza Delivery Man Brought Pies To A Military Base. Then Was Arrested, Turned Over For Deportation

Sorry. The law says hiring illegals is illegal.
Your silly strawmen are just that.

 

Again, you want to blame the woman for dressing so she will be raped, or having nice things so it is your fault that your home is burglarized. If they didn't have jobs that beat anything at their home country, they are coming here illegally by the millions for jobs here, just like the burglar will take your stuff because he doesn't have money of his own.

If hiring illegals is against the law, then why don't they reject the illegals when they find them. If they don't eject them, the illegals will have to find something to live off of. The government is violating the REAL law, the constitution, which says the federal government will protect the states from invasion. If the government did it's job, there would be no illegal aliens to hire.

Here is article 4, section 4 of the constitution just for reference.

Article IV | Constitution | US Law | LII / Legal ...
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/articleiv

Section 4. The United States shall guarantee to every state in this union a republican form of government, and shall protect each of them against invasion; and on application of the legislature, or of the executive (when the legislature cannot be convened) against domestic violence.

Red bolding is mine just so you don't miss it. I will give you a very small partial with not hiring them, and those that do, charge them with sedition. But the main flux is the invasion and our government sitting on it's hand, and WELCOMING lawlessness by welcoming the Illegal aliens. Sanctuary cities governments should be arrested and charged with sedition also. I am with Trump, lets get rid of them and those who give aid and comfort to the enemy.

• Article V · Article III · U.S. Constitution

 

You lying about what I say or mean doesn't help your side of the case.
Plain and simple, hiring illegal immigrants is illegal. Has nothing to do with a woman or a rape. Or how nice of stuff you have in your home. If you can't be honest in a debate, don't bother.

8 U.S. Code § 1324a - Unlawful employment of aliens

• US Code
• Notes
• Authorities (CFR)

prev | next
entity—
(a)Making employment of unauthorized aliens unlawful
entity—
(A)
to hire, or to recruit or refer for a fee, for employment in the United States an alien knowing the alien is an unauthorized alien(as defined in subsection (h)(3)) with respect to such employment, or

United States an individual without complying with the requirements of subsection (b) or (ii) if the person or entity is an agricultural association, agricultural employer, or farm labor contractor (as defined in section 1802 of title 29), to hire, or to recruit or refer for a fee, for employment in the United States an individual without complying with the requirements of subsection

 

What's the second choice?

 

You sure do seem to think you know exactly all about me.

Amazing.

 

IT works about as good as the drug laws, good thing we don't have any illegal drugs in the USA.
As I said before, yes, hiring illegals is against the laws, but if nobody enforces them, then are they really laws? However, again, I don't blame the home owner for having pretty things that the burglar wants, and that is what you are trying to pull the blame on. They invade our country because employers have pretty things, like the American dollar and that is why they come. However, if none of the illegals followed the laws, there would be none to hire illegally >). You are mixing theory with practice.

And you seem to have a reading comprehension problem. Did you miss this in a previous post?
Red bolding is mine just so you don't miss it. I will give you a very small partial with not hiring them, and those that do, charge them with sedition. But the main flux is the invasion and our government sitting on it's hand, and WELCOMING lawlessness by welcoming the Illegal aliens. Sanctuary cities governments should be arrested and charged with sedition also. I am with Trump, lets get rid of them and those who give aid and comfort to the enemy.

 

I read your posts.

 

I showed my mate this story last night and he said I guess he wasn't there in 30 minutes lol

 

Don't worry, we have literally thousands of social nets to catch these children and their mother! There is a 100% chance that the mother and children will be better off financially from "We" taxpayers then Pablo was pulling down as a pizza delivery boy

 

Not my job, man. Entry into the Union is a federal Obligation since 1808.

I already pay Taxes for this; I don't need this, non-Tax burden.

 

And I'm saying enforce them.
This guy stayed, and I bet he held a few jobs. Track down those employers and deport them, with him. That's what everyone wants to do to this guy. Punish all involved.
I saw the very small partial. Pointless.
Many come here to make a better life, they get jobs to make that life better. If they couldn't get the jobs, they don't come. Most of them.

 

It is the responsibility of every employer to follow the law of the land.

 

Dude.. You joined this forum literally 4 months ago.

I have over 10K posts. I am flattered to think that you went back and read 10K posts to be able to determine my position on every subject, but I also think you are full of it. To be blunt, you don't have a fricken clue what my positions are, and your attempts to label me as you see fit, to then argue against my position that you created from thin air speaks to the desperation in your agenda.

You don't know me, and all you have are ASSumptions. Your tactics are neither original nor impressive. If you want to try to debate with my, and logically discuss the topics at hand, I am all for it. If your vile hostility and attempts at "winning" the argument is all you bring to the table, then run along.

 

Hey, if you cannot take the heat! hehehe. I have been on the boards 20 years, and find it very easy to read posts and the people's position behind them. . My posts run in the 50,000 and I am an administrator on one to boot. Looks like I hit a nerve and the nail on the head!

 

Our supreme law of the land declares entry into the Union is a federal Obligation since 1808.

States have no Constitutional basis to care if someone is from out of State or from out of state.

It has never been an Individual concern.

 

Hmm... wonder why you feel the need to create multiple logins then.

Too many people have you on ignore, so have to start fresh?

 

Yes they do.
How do they take out the necessary FICA and other taxes?

 

I call this progress! There are plenty more in country who need to be rooted out of the "infrastructure" and those who employ them need to face serious penalties, being that these same people think that this is some sort of game of cat and mouse.

 

The power to tax is delegated to Congress.

 

This is speaking a language that I definitely understand. If the employers that employ the illegals would be penalized, I am talking about EVERYONE who employs them, from homeowners to business owners where deported, finances frozen and confiscated, fined and/or imprisoned for at least five years minimum, this would cease over night. The reason this is not being stopped has much to do with keeping the corridor open for narcotics cartels, child smuggling rings, as well as entry and exit escape routes for the guilty parties. Yes, this is all connected because logic dictates that absolutely NOTHING takes place in a vacuum.

 

LOL.
The power to take taxes out of the paycheck is at the employer.

 

So you're saying our gov't wants the drug cartels?? Child smuggling rings?

 

the power is express.

if they are not applying for citizenship they are tourists; and it is not covered under the immigration authority.

 

Some elements do want them because those cartels are used to keep themselves (politicians and government agents and agencies) in power through elections and "need:. By the way, because they are so corrupt, I lay absolutely no claim to them.