Typical Anti-Choicer reply, no relevance, a dodge, no facts pertinent to the issue, no argument, ...nothing...
You could just ask the immigrant in their own language.... Are you saying that nobody has bothered to learn to speak fetus?
AARguy said: ↑ Yes, it is clearly murder. Just ask a fetus. Oh? You can't? So its ok to kill an immigrant in America if they can't speak English? Same logic.. The Anti-Choice side shows just how intelligent their "argument " is (zero).....and myopic....they think if a person can't speak ENGLISH they can't communicate !
The only thing that is "clear" .. is that you have no understanding of the difference between a single human cell and a human. Shall we play a game of "Which one is not like the Other" ?
Standard recipe is the same as for a parrot. You place a stone in the pot with the bird boiled furiously and when the stone is soft you throw away the bird and eat the stone
Time to figure out the difference between a noun and descriptive adjective ... and who is "We" ? There is no "We" at the moment of conception .. there is no "Me" .. and in fact there is no "moment of conception".
From the Texas Tribune: Canada has NO laws against abortion and pays for them through there health care system. They have WAY fewer abortions than we have. So, it's interesting that you are wrong on ALL counts. AND, I don't appreciate your attempt at partisan crappolla on an important issue. It's telling the Breitbart had to resort to data from OTHER COUNTRIES to support their total garbage.
And a vast majority of abortions are also medicinal (drug) and not surgical which most anti-abortionists seem to think.
I can understand opposing abortion, but so far, no one has been able to formulate a pan for enforcing abortion laws. Lets say that you can write the law, and receive unlimited resources to enforce it. Whats your plan?
I wouldn’t have laws regulating abortion. Let individuals decide, but do everything possible to reestablish morality and a sense of personal responsibility to our culture. That’s difficult, I know, and a very long term effort. But, when a society loses it’s moral basis no amount of government power will be able to maintain a decent civil society,
I agree with this, at least insofar as that there are actual reasons for getting an abortion and it is possible that we could work to reduce those reasons. One advantage of that direction is that it is far more likely that we can all work together on that direction - while working together on laws that are even harsher on women isn't at all likely. We can also notice that Canada has a far lower abortion rate than does America, and Canada has no laws against abortion and pays for abortions through their healthcare system. Given that, we can hardly claim that laws against women are an absolute requirement for reducing the abortion rate.
Yes! I was impressed by your direction and not accusing you of backing these laws and the harsher ones being designed. I'm not sure how we would address general morality. However, I do believe there are avenues we could all work on together, rather than battling over how harsh the laws should be.
Sounds reasonable to me. Abortion rates are already declining and there are ways to convince those considering abortion to give birth. One group gives free ultrasounds and lets the mother hear the heartbeat. As long as there is no government interference!