Abortionists killing babes after birth? Infanticide okay?

Founded by a genocidal racist. Be proud.

 

Yes, planted parenthood has committed genocide against our unborn babies.

Abortion is violent. You see, If the left had it their way, abortion would quickly lead to genocide on a massive scale. Because "trimming" society doesn't end with infants, IT BEGINS with infants.

Murder finds ways of creeping into our society and via abortion is one of them. We must keep satan out of the picture at all costs. And Trump is doing just that by appointing CONSERVATIVE judges. Then again the left doesn't need judges because they have no moral problem with crime. But that is another discussion altogether.

Margeret Sanger was a real piece of work. Racist and socialist, and obsessed with eugenics. Totally self centered.
If I had to pick between leading women of their day, I would pick Mother Teresa hands down.







VERSUS THE LOVELY Margaret SANGER:





Sanger believed the ‘Negro district’ was the ‘headquarters for the criminal element’ and concluded that, as the title of a book by a member of her board proclaimed, The Rising Tide of Color Against White World Supremacy, was a rise that had to be stemmed.Medical Apartheid: The Dark History of Medical Experimentation on Black Americans from Colonial Times to the Present, Doubleday, New York, p. 196, 2006. To deal with the problem of resistance among the black population, Sanger recruited black doctors, nurses, ministers and social workers ‘in order to gain black patients’ trust’ in order ‘to limit or even erase the black presence in America’.37

“ I consider that the world and almost our civilization for the next twenty-five years, is going to depend upon a simple, cheap, safe contraceptive to be used in poverty stricken slums, jungles, and among the most ignorant people. Even this will not be sufficient, because I believe that now, immediately, there should be national sterilization for certain dysgenic types of our population who are being encouraged to breed and would die out were the government not feeding them.”
Planned Parenthood Founder, Margaret Sanger, 1950

Full source:
https://saynsumthn.wordpress.com/20...d-founder-born-sept-14th-not-celebrated-here/

https://creation.com/margaret-sanger-darwinian-eugenicist

 

In your opinion, who is/was the best role model for our children? Sanger the Alcholic or Mother Teresa the saint?

 

Ever heard of "sex without consequences? Might want to look into that publication.

 

Certainly not a genocidal racist who founded PP. More democrat "heritage".

 

Moronic statement on your part. One can be pro-choice and hope the choice is mostly not to abort unless there are medical reasons to do so. Abortions have decreased over the last few decades because of education and easier access to birth control. This country already tried anti-abortion laws and they were a failure. The average woman who wanted an abortion simple took a "vacation" to an area where abortions were legal and the only people ever convicted under anti-abortion statutes were the poor who got caught up with back alley abortionists. And that was at a time when the whole country was far more conservative than we are today. Anti-abortions laws are a waste - that money could be used to create better pre-natal clinics and buy more incubators for keeping wanted babies alive.

 

Oh! Dear!

Another person who has been fooled by resin models. Purportedly that of a 12 week old miscarried foetus the model is simply too pink and too transparent to be real

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/12-week-photo/

Do you lot get some kind of pre planned manifesto because I swear the pattern of posting is the SAME in the last dozen or so threads

1. Embed the idea that all abortions are “killing babies” by linking late term abortions into your argument
2. Push the idea that women choose abortions for frivolous reasons such as using it for contraception
3. Demonise planned parenthood by posting discredited and unsourced rumours
4. Play the “god and country” card ignoring the fact that the GOP has cut funding for child support
5. Post misleading pictures of resin dolls again to try and embed the idea of “killing babies”
6. Pull the race card with Margaret Sanger

I have missed a few but this is why Fox and Derideo and Renee and i and so many others find it easy to rebut these “arguments”. We have been here before and recognise bull when we see it

 

Ever heard of the Fact that the only interventions to reduce the rate of abortion is LARC plus education

 

Wow! Someone who cannot tell the difference between eugenics and genocide
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Sanger#Eugenics

 

Oh and on the subject of memes

 

Her stated goal was to eradicate blacks. Are you cool with her mission?

 

Lets take a look at the definition of pro choice

(I stand by my original statement):

WRONG. The picture I posted is of a real baby (miscarried at 12 weeks)

Snopes is talking about this image of a "fake" baby (which could also be used for demonstration purposes. Imagine a scissors cutting into the back of his or her neck? Are you serious? Killing children? You should be ashamed of yourself.


NOT the one I posted earlier. He was a miscarriage at 12 weeks.
Ideal time to be aborted. Yeah, not just a clump of cells if you ask me. His name was Noah Alexander.

Here is another REAL example of a miscarriage at 19 weeks.


More photos and the touching story can be found here:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...breaking-photos-baby-miscarried-19-weeks.html

 

What makes you think pro life ends at birth? Dont you think that kinda defeats the purpose of saving the life in the first place? The adventure STARTS at birth my friend and under the DoI this person has the right to life liberty and the pursuit of happiness, which by the way I haven't heard a solid argument from abortion advocates on this. At least in a philosophical sense, humor me.

 

Wasnt Hilter big into eugenics? Yeah, he was.

But please, give the class your take on the differences? Compare and contrast....

After that you can ask me a challenge question and I will respond in kind.

 

Lols! Another resin doll courtesy of Donna Lee
https://donnaleeoriginals.com/siliconebabies.html

Yes and it is NOT viable

Now are you going to charge the mother with murder?

 

So? What are YOU doing to save the children?

Are you doing anything about the poverty that women find themselves in that forces them to choose between feeding a family or abortion?

 

I provided a link....

 

Show me where she said that

 

Why? You will just poo poo the source and quote politifact or snopes. I can show you, but it would be a waste of time and you would respond predictably. She has plenty of quotes you can look up.

 

I would prefer children to be alive rather than dead. If they are dead they have absolutely no chance for success. If they are alive, who knows, perhaps one of them might turn out to be Oprah. You just never know.

I would like to get your take, abortion advocates, on Steve Jobs. He very easily could have been aborted. Do you even see the human potential lost when you have an abortion? x 60,000,000 futures destroyed by liberals.

 

Why are you posting fake baby pictures? Mine are all real. Something about seeing such a fragile life form --- being brutally dismembered---

Ever heard of an abortion survivor?

12 weeks


19 weeks

 

Because they have to pretend they are less than human to justify their butchery.

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
I think women who get abortions have to be supporters or they wouldn't get one....


and you STILL haven't proven that abortion supporters are mostly atheists ….

There ya go again, saying something that you have no proof of whatsoever....YOU do NOT know every woman who had an abortion, YOU do NOT know what they feel, YOU do NOT know their circumstances.

You DO act like all women are carbon copies of each other.

Uh, WHO said anything about "churches" advocating for abortion??? NO, I said all abortion supporters (and USERS)m are not all atheists AND....



and you STILL haven't proven that abortion supporters are mostly atheists ….

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
A human ZEF is human and NO one has said any different.

And ZEFs can't be "murdered"...

I 'm not...I'm answering for me....why are you confused? Anyone can address any post in here without your permission

Duh, there is NO "admitting" to do...NO one including me , has ever said a human ZEF wasn't human...


that is part of the Anti-Choicers Imagination Land program where they say Pro-Choicers don't think the fetus or ZEF is human when NO ONE HAS EVER SAID THAT.


,

Abortion isn't murder but keeping children in dog kennels and applauding it makes one a monster

 

Then you shouldn't have any trouble PROVING IT

Into "Anti-Choicers Imagination Land When They Have No Good Argument"

LOL! Ya, NO one had sex before Planned Parenthood came along...hilarious!!!


AND, of course, no proof of your claim whatsoever...

I can say it's irrelevant gobbledygoop...​