Are Democrats as tired of Hillary as the rest of us?

And I never imagined dems would be so stupid as to put Nancy Pelosi back in leadership again after losing the House since 2010.

Steve

 

Umm, I didn't bring up the subject. I just responded to the thread - am I not allowed to do so?

 

80 percent of all Hillary references are started by leftist media outlets and so, yes, leftists are endlessly bringing up their sacred Queen of Corruption.

 

To be honest about it since they control 95 percent or more of the nation's media outlets they don't have to learn anything about it. That's why they keep running and endorsing openly corrupt politicians like Hillary and open socialists and outright radical nation-haters; because the MSM is ALWAYS there to spin things for the benefit of the Dem Party's leadership. It is what it is.

 

"It's a beautiful thing," said Syme to Winston, from Orwell's 1984.

Steve

 

If was front page on my news feeds. But if you want to claim I am the only one bringing her up, that I have just been dreaming the MSM fawning over them and their tour go ahead.

 

What a gigantic strawman. I find it odd that the people who claims to hate the MSM, still watches them then run to this forum and post their displeasure. HC is old news to me. I have never supported her and never will. I don't pay attention to what she does on a daily basis like many RWers on this board. You want to develop an unhealthy obsession with her, you go right ahead.

 

The first rule of critical thinking skills is to get BOTH SIDES of the issues. When YOU ignore the media you disagree with, then YOU never learn a damn thing. YOU just parrot your favorite media's propaganda.

Steve

 

HC isn't an "issue." She is old news. Wake me up in 2020 IF she decides to run.

 

Did you predict dems would NOT restore Nancy Pelosi to the House leadership after losing elections since 2010?

Steve

 

I did no such thing. Did you bet that Alexandria Ocasio Cortez wouldn't win her seat?

Betting/prediction on politics is a losing proposition.

 

I agree, but IT SHOWS DEMS ARE IDEOLOGICAL and only WANT POWER.

Dems don't give a damn what the PEOPLE WANT!

Steve

 

It's almost December, your story is from ... Published 1:58 p.m. ET Oct. 9, 2018 |

Oops, looks like you're in luv.

 

Does it really matter? Dems dont pick their candidates anyway , that is done for them by the DNC. the sheep do what they are told .

 

It doesn't 'bother' me. And I don't agree that she's the best the left has to offer. I didn't think she was in 2016 either.

 

Odds of that happening are very low IMO. I wonder if the oddsmaker are giving odds for this ?

After writing I looked it up. Hillary is at +6600.

For comparison .. Trump is at +150 Mark Zuckerberg is also at +6600, George Clooney +8000.

This is to actually win in 2020 - not just run.

 

Why would anyone want to wake you up?

Clinton does little to dampen 2020 speculation
BY AMIE PARNES - 11/30/18 06:00 AM EST



Hillary Clinton is increasingly weighing in on critical political events, keeping her name in the news and doing little to dampen speculation that she might once again run for president.

While Clinton associates insist the 2016 Democratic nominee is not running again, she has refused to rule out the possibility herself in interviews.

Just a month ago, Clinton said that she would “like to be president” after she was asked if she would launch another White House bid.
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/418991-clinton-does-little-to-dampen-2020-speculation

 

It would be interesting to see her campaign again, and it would be interesting to see how it went now that the Russian interference issue has been exposed and publicly digested, and perhaps mitigated to at least some extent.

 

If you're only asking about liberals/progressives/socialists who are not "normal Americans," then I'm tempted to say, who cares? But it sounds like you're talking out of your keister when you use such language, anyway. You're not talking about any actual people, but taking the opportunity to smear people you don't know and don't care or attempt to know anything about.

 

Trump is corrupt, the FBI is not.

Thanks for playing.

 

Even she could probably win the next election against the Liar in Chief. He barely scraped out a win in 2016 (didn't even get a popular vote majority) with quite an impressive stack of advantages.

 

“Her supporters love her and we always will, but she won't run and she shouldn't,” said one former Clinton aide. “She's less popular than Trump and all her negatives are still there. Her campaign was awful. She would have been an amazing president, and it was all incredibly unfair, but none of that will change in 2020.”
Democratic strategist Jim Manley, who served as a Clinton campaign surrogate in 2016, said she needs to step aside.

“With all due respect, she had her chance and it didn't work out,” Manley said. “She ran such a lousy campaign Donald Trump is now the president of the United States. I have a lot of respect for her, but she had her chance and it didn't work out.”
Even those who worked on the campaign and longtime Clinton allies have been left wondering why the Clintons are on the speaking circuit. “Stupid tour,” one longtime ally dubbed it.

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/418991-clinton-does-little-to-dampen-2020-speculation

 

Things can and do change over the course of a campaign, and who's to say what her popularity will be like in another year and a half or so? The mob is fickle.

 

Go with it.

 

The mob doesn't choose the Democrat nominee - the DNC does. She took all the DNC money and spent it on her own losing campaign. I don't think the DNC wants to gamble on her again. Maybe if she joined AA and sobered up............
Yes things can change - she might be in prison in 2020 for paying for a phony dossier.