Are Democrats as tired of Hillary as the rest of us?

The dossier isn't phony and it isn't hers, but boy, some people really want those lies to be the truth, don't they?

 

PROVE IT!

The DoJ's inspector general has already proven many in the FBI, and some of Mueller's OWN PEOPLE are corrupt as hell. But Mueller decided to keep making a fool of himself because he is PROTECTING THEM.

Steve

 

Prove it. Proof of Trump's corruption is all over the place and still mounting by the day.

 

The justice system has been politicized by Obama. The FBI tried to infiltrate Trump's campaign.

 

The Dems love hillary and always will. Now matter how stupid she is.

 

You're just a fool waiting to be plucked by the DNC and Clinton again.

Corrupt bureaucrats were protected by Mueller. It is why Trump was nominated and elected in the first place. It was necessary to move dems back in leadership. They did that with the help of the lying liberal media going full blast against republicans 24/7, and only managed a measly 4 or 5 percent win in the House. Now dems erroneously think they have a mandate and will screw themselves once again like they did in 2010.

Corrupt bureaucrats (FBI) cannot let one political candidate off the hook for her crimes (CLINTON), and then turnaround and try to remove the OPPOSING CANDIDATE from office without evidence (TRUMP).

From Donald Trump's own campaign in 2016, "The media-donor-political complex that’s bled this country dry has to be replaced with a new government of, by and for the people." -- Donald Trump

Steve

 

And you saying it doesn't make it true. Quite the opposite I think.

After Mr. Trump secured the nomination, Fusion GPS was hired on behalf of Mrs. Clinton’s campaign and the D.N.C. by their law firm, Perkins Coie, to compile research about Mr. Trump, his businesses and associates — including possible connections with Russia. It was at that point that Fusion GPS hired Mr. Steele, who has deep sourcing in Russia, to gather information.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/25/us/politics/steele-dossier-trump-expained.html

 

I'm not sure if the liberals/progressives/socialists here are simply ignorant when it comes to being informed, are if they are disingenuous when it comes to discussing facts they refuse to believe.

Who's talking about the corrupt Hillary Clinton?

A brief example:

https://www.click2houston.com/news/...id-speaking-tour-with-plenty-of-ire-for-trump

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/clintons-back-spotlight-kick-off-102936419.html

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/video/news/clinton-begins-speaking-tour-with-2020-joke/vi-BBQbhsy

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...5875bac0b1f_story.html?utm_term=.6c899b4674b3

https://www.newsweek.com/video-clintons-slam-trump-we-have-president-who-part-cover-1234677

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entr...ry-of-trump-admin_us_5bf82315e4b0eb6d930e2714

https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/worl...f-saudi-journalist-jamal-khashoggi/ar-BBQdVJi

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/27/opinion/letters/hillary-clinton-europe-migration.html

I could have posted dozens of links from the past week or so. Why do leftists claim "nobody" is talking about the corrupt Hillary other than the right? Plenty of mainstream news sources will publish articles about the corrupt and failed Hillary on a regular basis.

Why do liberals/progressives/socialists need to constantly deflect these facts? Or is it a big lie in that they've convinced themselves by repeating their nonsensical theories so often that they no longer recognize the truth?

Hence, leftists are so very predictable; here is an illustration:

1) Hillary will spout some of her usual nonsense and her supporters – biased Democratic Party operatives who pose as journalists – will diligently type up her press releases and call it breaking news.

2) Other journalists who are not amongst the Democratic Party operatives who pose as reporters will quickly discover the assorted lies and flaws in the corrupt Hillary's statements and report on this.

3) People like me will highlight in these forums about how, once again, Hillary is lying and twisting the truth in her attempts to keep relevent.

4) Liberals/progressives/socialists here will spring to life to defend Hillary, but will be unable to defend Hillary's actions and statements as the truth because, well, Hillary.

5) At this point, said leftists will fall back on one of their last-ditch patented defenses they depend on and ask why the right ALWAYS posts about Hillary.

This is similar to when they are losing a debate and will shout 'raaccciiissst!' or 'miisssogynisttt!"

So I'll ask again: are you lefties getting as tired as the rest of us with all the coverage the mainstream media gives to a failed presidential candidate?

I certainly am. But then again, leftist rags such as the New York Times and Washington Post certainly know their audience, don't they?

 

The people talking about Hillary are Trump and his many fans. Democrats want to forget about Hillary and the 2016 election debacle.

 

You missed my point that the leftist mainstream media was cheering Hillary about her upcoming stadium tour – "Isn't Hillary wonderful?" – but when it came time to report on said tour a few short weeks later, they left out the fact that Hillary and Bill could only attract an embarrassingly small number of people.

You see this, right? And thanks for allowing me to point this out, once again, how in spite of the cheerleading provided by Democratic Party operative posing as journalists in the mainstream media Hillary failed yet again...

 

See the post prior to yours, and then tell me why the leftist mainstream media is still, constantly, reporting on all things Hillary.

Are you also tired of her? Some leftists claim they are...

 

Give it a rest with your holier than thou attitude. I already said I don't give a damn what she does or doesn't do. I didnt vote for her in the last election and never will. I don't pay attention when she comes on the news and I would flip the channel or turn off the TV. But then what happen when I come here? I see a bunch of righties post about the woman to bitch and moan why she is on TV. Go ahead and see the amount of posts on here about Clinton. Is it mostly from the forum lefties or righties. You guys have an unhealthy obsession with a woman that won't ever be president.

 

I tend to ignore Hillary Clinton to the max. When she comes on the news or the news start talking about her which it seems daily, I switch the channel. I do the same thing with Trump. I really can't stand either one. But Trump is president and having him in the news is normal. Hillary quest for fame is a lost to Trump and another to Obama. She did win a New York Senate seat, but Mrs. Gaylord Comquat could do that easily if she ran as a Democrat in New York State. There it is only the D that matters, not the candidate.

 

Are you claiming liberals/progressives/socialists are, indeed, normal Americans?

You know, Americans who support their police, appreciate the work of their military, recognize that Black Lives Matter and AntiFa are violent extremists, support property rights, recognize the importance of the First and Second Amendments, support our teachers but not our teacher unions when they insist on harming our children, stand for the National Anthem, abhor identity politics as practiced by leftists, would never spit on soldiers and others as leftists did in the 1960s and '70s, believe in the rule of law and due process, and lastly, encourage a smaller Fed.gov that doesn't intrude on our lives.

And that's just for starters...

 

I'm simply addressing what the Democratic Party operatives who pose as journalists write and talk about Hillary every day, day after day.

Why is the leftist mainstream media so obsessed with Hillary? And why do liberals/progressives/socialists insist on rushing to her defense?

I realize that many leftists desire to censor those they disagree with, it's part of their DNA. But alas, this doesn't work in most of America so I'd encourage you to skip my posts?

Or feel free to engage in debate, that's why we're here, right?

 

Dems will never get sick of Hillary, she is corruption , right up dems ally.

 

You are not debating. You are making all sorts of accusations and assumptions. In your opinion since I am a liberal, you lump me into this group who supports Clinton, even after I told you I don't support her. Isn't that a collectivist way of thinking you've accused leftists of being guilty of? As far as the media, they love to be controversial for the sake of ratings. I doubt your average dem will ever support Clinton since they didn't in the last cycle.

 

So me a study that most normal liberals support Black Lives Matter and Antifa. You sounds like their are only the extremes on either side.

 

October. Near 2 months ago.
You are in love.

 

Pants, what breed of dog is that in your avatar?

 

I am loving it. The Clintons are like an anchor weighing the democrats down. They just remind the American people just how corrupt the dem party is.

 

Awww, you can't get enough of Ms. Clinton. You have to let her go......

 

You told me to "give it a rest," correct?

Why the desire to censor my words? I happen to agree with you about the media and their desire to be controversial, but I would add this need for controversy certainly did not exist during the corrupt Obama's reign.

And I disagree with you re Democrats supporting Hilary; look at how they rushed to her defense in this thread.

You are aware that Obama blatantly supported BLM? Many feel this support emboldened the far left, resulting in the assassinations of police officers in Dallas and Baton Rouge.

Why wouldn't I assume that Democrats support this extremist organization when their president did?:

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/president-barack-obama-defends-black-lives-matter-movement/

 

And you are certainly impaired in some fashion, it seems.

Here. I'll say it slowly for you:

The mainstream media celebrated Hillary's upcoming tour in October. They spoke about how awesome she is, and how she needed to host her events in stadiums because of the large crowds who were expected to attend.

A month later we learn she only attracted a scant couple of thousand people, and her event would have probably have fit in a high school gym.

The lesson here is the cheerleading media was wrong yet again; more fake news, if you will.

I'm not sure if you are simply thick and don't get it as your reading and comprehension ability have seemed to fail you, or if you are a Team Blue zealot who can't bring themselves to think forbidden thoughts.

You do realize I had to post links to the cheerleading media before and after Hillary's event? You really don't get this? Really?

 

Have the Democratic Party operatives who pose as journalists for the mainstream media let go of Hillary?