Aspiring Scientists, Fearful For The Future, March Against Donald Trump

Ummmm - Little bit of advice - check before you post
https://www.nrdc.org/experts/alvin-lin/chinas-new-plans-deepen-action-climate-change
http://theconversation.com/for-chin...ts-a-business-and-political-opportunity-69191

 

All aspiring to disect a fetus provided by Planned Parenthood. Not that I in any way oppose organ donation or legitimate clinical research. Just saying liberal scientists don't necessarily share Americas values. Thank you, but no Frau Frankenstein ...

 

You know it is the same as the Yuuuuuge crowds for a certain person's inauguration
But if you had bothered to check the 500 refers to the name of the group not how many were actually there
https://500womenscientists.org/calendar/2017/4/22/march-for-science

 

In fact the ethics processes make it far far higher standard than your average republican

 

Too true!!!

The first shows scientists actually do have a sense of humour and the second is so very very true = just look at where rising sea levels will impact most over the world

 

Paris called. They said China won't reduce emissions until 2030. Or, I should say, they will "seek to" reduce them.

Not that the Paris accords are legally binding, nor do they have any enforcement procedures.

 

Sorry, I was unaware that sarcasm was not recognized down under.

 

That's the reality of progress. Cheap fuels create profit for innovation, and the industry by which to mfg and distribute renewables. Nations cannot simply throw out the old before providing for the new. The US needs a massive investment in it's power grid. That infrastructure program should be in concert with private wind / solar farm developement. Cooperation will streamline the transition without detriment to the energy sector. The more coordination the quicker the transition.

 

Trump cannot endure with the mass of protests against him.

The most divisive POTUS in history.

 

Only please learn lessons from South Aus because they privatised and ended in a mess.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/programs...and-dawe:-the-energy-market-explained/8359762

 

Well it is if it is flagged as same

Sorry but given the quality of posts from the right I just automatically assume it is a stupid comment

My mistake that yours might have been an exception to that

 

Sarcasm aside, "average republican"? The media representations, and many of the GOPs own elected reps, in no way accurately depict an "average republican". I'm actually a conservative Independent. Catholic university grad., army vet, father / husband. Pro-choice more than anti abortion. Morally disagree, don't want to finance, think a fetus at least deserves respectful cremation. The Dr and mother can plead their cases before God, not my problem. I'm not a missionary.

 

Science is a liberal lie. The earth is 6,000 years old.

 

So, anyone who suspects these vaccines are anti science? LOL.

So, why have these scientists not discovered why the rates of autism are exponentially higher than they have ever been in the history of medicine? Something environmental is causing it, in this cause/effect universe. Well, I am guessing it is environmental, but why have these smarty pants folks not discovered the cause for the increase? When children suddenly develop autism after vaccines, of course it would make a rational person question the vaccines. These vaccines are not the ones I got, but include infectious diseases that we never used to vaccinate for. Do you trust Big Pharma and their scientists? You know, every scientist is also a human being. Scientists are not any more infallible, any more moral, or have greater honesty than any other human being. What? We want to make them the new High Priests?

I trust the scientists who work for our rich elites as far as I can throw them. And being old, I could not even pick up a skinny one, much less toss him.

Heaven help us if this society turns scientists into our High Priests, the arbiters of truth. For they also gave us the nuclear bomb, incurable fast killer diseases, the means to end all human life on this planet. They used human beings for testing venereal diseases, never telling those people what they were doing, and other harmful testing on behalf of our gov't, on innocent americans.

Anyways, this deal with these lefties is just more silly nonsense, directed at trump. Science is safe, and this is just more silly hysterics. One wonders where the wisdom is here? For a person can be intelligent, while exhibiting a total lack of wisdom.

 

Never apologize for being a thinker and not a feeler.

 

The outrageous amounts of contaminants created by the manufacture of the storage batteries, which if they are cracked will leak even MORE TOXIC waste than their manufacture created.

Cost per KWH, wind power is not cheap at all, due to its unreliablility, ad LOW AMPERAGE OUTPUT.

 

That isn't the result if we do this. Do you actually believe all of these poor countries beleive in climate change? They just want the money.

What prediction has this so called scientific community gotten right in 40 years? First it was an ice age, then New York would be underwater by now. How many times must they get it wrong before you wake up?

This is billions if not trillions of dollars and none of it is even remotely likely to effect the weather pattern.

You are mixing cleaning up the environment with climate change when they aren't even close to being the same thing.

 

Is Earth Gaia forensics an actual science?

 

Prove that BS claim.

 

Facts certainly aren't.

 

You aren't making any sense @Bowerbird. As Grockmaster said if you weren't going to believe him why did you ask?

Just remember dude, you are arguing with someone who had a man drive a car through a group of people, kill several including a kid, had a witness who heard him yell allu ackbar and the terrorist himself claiming he was Islamic, had a friend who said he had recently converted to Islam and Bowerbird still denied it was a Muslim terrorist attack.

That's the mentality you are dealing with here.

 

I asked if there were any republicans and I made the error of not specifying public figures who could be verified.

The very fact that a figure that is not specified is posted in reply, well..............

 

No

 

Then you should not be so willing to believe right wing rubbish

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/planned-parenthood-is-not-harvesting-baby-parts-20151008

 

Your post did not define the measurement

Something no one properly schooled in science would be lax enough to do. What was that .0004 supposed to be? It is not the percentage of CO2. And if it is PPM then that is almost exclusively written as same