Barack Obama "The Rock Star Legal Professor" is a Total Fraud

Heh- love how the Obama haters call 'quislings' anyone who dares to expose the anti-Obama propaganda, even after having the lies in the article exposed.

 

And you still can't accept that the majority of voters selected this specific man......

 

Just to back up to the OP- lets review shall we.

First claim: Total Fraud- only evidence 88 can give to support that claim is that Obama called himself a professor- like his employer and his students did.

Second claim: that his student and peer evaluations were lousy- the article itself says that for the first two years he was rank the top evaluated teacher. Whether or not the Examiners claims are accurate are doubtful since another paper reported completely different results. Interviews with his students showed him to be popular.

Of course none of that has to do with anything that Obama claimed. This is just part of the story line that the anti-Obama propaganda keeps trying to sell.

So we have this big OP- claiming 'FRAUD- FRAUD- FRAUD" and the best it could come up with was the President claiming he was the same thing that UCLS and his students said he was.

I think its pretty obvious what is the fraud.....and it isn't Obama.

 

The willard virus seems to be contagious. say something offensive and in the next breath pretend you didn't say it.

 

Obama, in this instance, but the mythology surrounding Lincoln is just as pathetic.

 

People make mistakes. People get caught up in the glimmer of history being made. People were pissed at the market crash. There were a lot of factors, all valid. High emotional states can be the basis for knee jerk reactions Such is the case with Obama. Throw in the MSM being in the tank for him and it was a perfect storm.

Obama ran on economic recovery and everyone sees what he looks like without greek pillars behind him, without a teleprompter, with his hands strangling job creators, with him regulating success. People have another chance to view him by his deeds. They are more sober now. I think they will choose wisely this time.

 

People make mistakes. People get caught up in the glimmer of history being made. People were pissed at the market crash. There were a lot of factors, all valid. High emotional states can be the basis for knee jerk reactions Such is the case with Obama. Throw in the MSM being in the tank for him and it was a perfect storm.

Obama ran on economic recovery and everyone sees what he looks like without greek pillars behind him, without a teleprompter, with his hands strangling job creators, with him regulating success. People have another chance to view him by his deeds. They are more sober now. I think they will choose wisely this time.

 

I had no idea that this was in doubt! At least they are finally catching up to me after all these years. Plus it is beyond obvious, so I really do not claim any clairvoience in the matter.

 

Try irrefutable truth.

 

Makes you wonder why it took the Washington Examiner so long to fabricate this story. Shoot, it doesn't take that long to make things up.

 

So even if the Govt had solid information and intellegence that an Al Quaida leader is plotting terrorist attacks against us, but cannot reasonably apprehend him, you just let them be to continue his efforts to strike the US than approving a drone attack to take him out.

And I would also assume you disapproved that Bin Laden was killed.

Those are tough positions, and my distrust of the Govt doesn't go that far under the circumstances.

I agree there is a balancing act between the amount of trust we gave to give our government and avoiding the abuse of that trust. We put trust in Govt law enforcement and license them to carry and use weapons to do their job. Sometimes a situation comes up where a suspect is shot and killed without due process. Nonetheless, I would not advocate disarming police because of that happens.

I very it similarly here. It is a balancing act between concern over a Govt that can abuse the power and IMO the legitimate need to target those who are doing or have done us harm.

You didn't answer my question. I was interested in your response, because to me it gets to the heart of the matter:

 

47% voted for him, that's true. Would you bite the hand that feeds you for free?

 

Heck no. I can't fathom why the little old ladies and men in nursing homes and mooching off the Govt, one of the largest parts of Romney's 47%, would vote for him.

But shockingly, a lot of them do.

 

Why in the world did Illinois electe him to congress in the first place. Obama did not win the last electioin the Republicans lost it with McCain/Palin and now we have Romney. It is a sad day for American when we don't have anyone to vote for and have to chose between the lessor of two idiots.

 

Brilliant young man who is a Harvard Law School magna cum laude graduate, editor of law review, who could have written his own check for any big Wall Street law firm, instead devotes his time to the community and public service.

No idea.

 

Uhm... can you fathom this? The Food Stamp President Expands Welfare Just in time to Pander to Parasites During Falling Popularity

 

Could you tell us why do you think the "Brilliant young man who is a Harvard Law School magna cum laude graduate, editor of law review, who could have written his own check for any big Wall Street law firm" lost (surrendered) his law license? You've no idea, right? Thought so.

 

I completely cannot fathom it.

What's wrong with him?

Vote for Romney, and lets get those nursing home moochers and poor kid who needs to see a doctor parasites cut off once and for all! That way we might be able to afford those huge tax cuts for the 1% Romney will pass.

God bless America.

 

We have a Constitution and a foundation of legal principles that err on the side of innocence. It has been that belief system, that set of principles that has made our legal system in the past respected all over the world.

Regardless of my personal opinion, regardless of yours or Obamas, we have a system of government that was as close to perfect as any nation has ever had. I would not throw that away, our heritage of freedom and equal justice, for expediency.

I am answering it. Our nation was founded upon the distrust of government, the belief in individual freedom, equal application of justice, and checks and balances. You're citing an example of a police officer out on the street at a robbery and someone has a gun pointing at him. That's an appropriate and legal use of capital force.

Drone killings are not.

Whenever our politicians have been given authority, they stretch it, grow it, and engage in activity beyond the scope of the legislation. I don't think it is prudent to trust them with this power.

 

There are many reasons upon which your license becomes forfeit or why you might surrender it, not all of them nefarious. I look at his record on civil liberties in the US and I'd have to say that maybe Thomas Jefferson came to him in a dream and (*)(*)(*)(*)(*) slapped him until he gave it back.

It's a theory.

 

Now while I don't agree with all of your opinions, I think the voters will choose wisely again.

Regardless of who they choose.

 

So you are calling military veterans leeches? Social Security recipients victims?

No wonder Romney is not beating Obama- seriously with the economy being the way it is, Willard should be trouncing Obama in the polls, but you and Romney think that military vets vote for Obama because they get a military pension.

How disconnected from reality can you be?

 

Well that is a problem with American politics isn't it?

I don't consider either Obama or Romney idiots, but I am far from convinced that these are the best America could offer up.

 

Ah Dutch still speading the smears....you know why...its been reported on several times. You just want to pass on the old tired anti-Obama lie. While not suprised, i am somewhat disappointed that you are willing to lie just to oppose Obama.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/lawlicenses.asp
http://www.factcheck.org/2012/06/the-obamas-law-licenses/

As Snopes explains- Obama never 'lost' his license- that of course is just a propaganda lie. Obama voluntarily retired.
http://www.iardc.org/ldetail.asp?id=162428720

Anyone who was interested in the truth would of course look that up. But the anti-Obama propagandists aren't interested in the truth- are they Dutch?

 

Nice.

You can hardly read 5 posts by our conservative friends without running into yet other lie, distortion, fabrication, opr misimplication.