This is why I don't get why people enjoy comics. I was not a comic book fan so I had to google a lot of the lesser known heroes that they are dredging up from the bottoms of barrels such as the Black Panther and some others who I never heard of. What I found out reading their comicographies was that they had been built up to god like status and then the writers had to nerf them back down to more normal abilities and in some cases more than one time. I don't know how you can read comics and deal with all that massive cognitive dissonance and plot issues. Plot holes and stupid plot mechanics are bad in movies and TV so why do people put up with them on comics where they are often worse than anything you will see in a TV series or movie? In one of the cases I believe it was Marvel they had to use some stupid plot mechanic to create an alternate "reset" universe. I can like scifi and fanstasy to a lesser degree but my suspension of disbelief isn't infinite. Silver Surfer could travel through black holes, some 12 year old kid could create entire worlds with his thoughts. It was just super silly nonsense.
They're comic books, the whole reason you read them is to try and break away from reality and get lost in the adventures of the X-Men or Spider-man or Superman. Plot issues, I can see but those depend on the writer and if they're actually paying attention. Although Black Panther is not a bottom of the barrel hero, he's been around since 1966 and was Stan Lee and Jack Kirby's own creation.
Super-powers are an upward slope: Typical case: a) Guy controls ice. b) Guy controls ice at the molecular level. c) Guy controls everything at the molecular level. And that being said, Civil War was quite a flick, independently of the genre.
The CW comics were typical of a good thing stretched much too far. But it did gave us some classics, including Ellis and Deodato's excellent "Thunderbolts" run ("Faith in Monsters" and "Caged Angels", that Bendis tried so hard to emulate with "Dark Avengers"), one of the best that ever came out of the MU, IMO. The flick broke it down to its basics... and it worked.
Civil War was a strong case of everyone's got good points but everyone's going about it the wrong way and doing things completely out of character i.e. Spider-man publicly revealing his identity.
Batman will always win in the end. That is his character. The man has Plan A, then Plan B, then Plan C, etc.... Batman will always find a way to deal with Wolverine.
Batman will use Wolverine's nature to trap himself. He's a detective, He knows Wolverines weaknesses. Wolverine is all instinct. Batman is a planner. He doesn't even show up to the fight unless he has already won.