Bombshell Report: Wait Until You See How Many Google Employees Donated to Democrats

Big Corporations working hand in glove with Big Government to shape opinion and allegiance to an authoritarian ideology.
That's the very essence of fascism, isn't it?

James Damore died for Google's sins and they have demonstrated in China how they will bow to the dictates of the generals in charge there as long as they are in on plan. I'm sure it's no accident at all that nearly all Google employees are party supporting democrats.
Group Think is necessary for fascism to flourish. Other points of view need not apply.

 

1 penny is too much. We shouldn’t have to pay for biased news. A private company can do whatever it wants. Public radio is heavily slanted to the left. I pay because I have to and I listen to get a pulse of both sides since that’s what intelligent people do. Only Progressives demand living in safe spaces and echo chambers.

 

I never said shut any business down. I’ve actually said many times in many threads any private business should be able to discriminate against anyone they choose. I’ve been very consistent.

The issue here is denial. Either own it and admit they’re biased or continue lying. Like I said, I’ll decide when enough is enough. The difference is you want govt to go and and regulate YOUR bias, when you agree with the govt. when OBama was In Office your ilk wanted regulation galore. But not now. I want the govt to stay out of it completely no matter who’s in charge.

And Trump outing all these corporations and news organizations is a good thing. The more people can see their hatred and bias, the better.

 

Break them Up.

 

no they are not, plenty of alternatives out there, and guess what, it's a free service, you are paying nothing to use it, talk about being a picky freeloader - "I only want pro-Trump results on my free service" - ask Trump to set you up a pay service to get pro-Trump search results day in and day out

cause the fact is, anyone that says as much offensive stuff daily as Trump is gonna have a lot of negative search results, as that is what people are clicking on and then the more clicks, the higher up the list it goes

 

Trump is a biased President, Google does not have a biased search engine - lol, get real

google search engine is free, stop complaining, use something else if you don't like it - Google lets everyone use it of any race, religions, gender, they do not care

 

Perhaps you could make an honest argument, as opposed to just making crap up.

I've never written that I only want pro-Trump results on my free service, or even a service I might pay for.

And your full of it when you say there are alternatives. Name the alternative to Facebook. Name the alternative to Twitter, or Google.

For example:

https://www.aborg.com/2014/08/google-vs-bing-which-one-are-your-customers-using/

First, let’s take a look at volume of searches by country.

• Google owns about 65% of the market share of US searches. This is down from about 72% back in 2010!
• Bing owns about 14%, but is now the same company as Yahoo which owns 16%, so collectively they make up about 30% of searches in the US.
• About 14% of searches in Canada are done on Bing.
• About 80% of searches in Canada are done on Google
• Just under 50% of Google searches are from the US, so unlike Bing, Google has more worldwide reach.
• Google holds the majority of search market share in all countries except Russia, China, South Korea, and Japan.

​

And then this

https://techcrunch.com/2015/01/27/facebook-dominates-social-logins/

For the most part, Facebook is taking market share away from Google at this point. Google’s overall share on Gigya’s network dropped from 24 percent in the third quarter of 2014 to 22 percent in the last quarter.

On mobile, Facebook’s dominance is even more pronounced. There, it owns 77 percent of all social logins, up from 62 percent in the previous quarter. All of those gains came at the expense of Google, which dropped from 28 percent to only 16 percent.
​

And you claim the President says negative things. That's your opinion, and I would guess it's fed by the media sources you use, otherwise you wouldn't have a clue what he says. And guess what, 90% of what the media reports on the President is negative.

I wonder when liberals will ever grasp the slippery slope they live on. I wonder if they will ever grasp the implications of a propaganda driven media that is generating billions in ad revenue by the click bait they invent for them.

 

Time for a right leaning entrepreneur to invest and create a right leaning search engine then. Supposedly, right leaning humans have supperior intellect to the left leaning humans, it shouldn't be difficult then. Or is it a fact that the more creative someone is, the more to the left their political leanings are.

Righty should concentrate on "shovel ready" jobs where the intellect is less of a factor. We still needs grunts for some tasks.

 

What the heck does that have to do with claiming or not claiming diversity? Pointless.

 

Public radio can't be biased, period. That is RW lies.

 

I am not here saying the gov't needs to break up those social media sites. If you aren't your buddies certainly are.
They can't seem to develop their own social media site.

Prove they are biased or it's just a lie.
tRUMP lying about corps and news organizations is not a good thing. But that you think it is, says you are against private businesses if you don't agree with them.
So you blew your claim.

 

Boo ****ing boo. Maybe the conservative message shouldn't be so hate filled and divisive and we wouldn't have s problem, would we?

 

Well if they're not claiming political diversity, then why does it matter that "Fox tv people contribute to the R party?"

 

It doesn't matter either way.
People are free to donate to whom they wish and to whatever party they wish. Claims or no claims.

 

So... Google is the mouthpiece of Democrat Party?

Nothing to worry about

 

Of course.

I wonder, does Google promote and otherwise recognize open Conservatives who, by accident, make it into their corporate hierarchy? What do you think?

 

Well, we do have Rush Limbaugh who singlehandedly made scores of Liberals (not gonna say what, wanna be civil here ) And you and yours can't stop bitching about him

 

And?

 

Who cares, and why would it matter?
How many liberals work for Limbaugh? Faux TV?

 

An interesting question. I would hazard a guess to suggest that a conservative voice at Google would be maligned, and quickly cast out. I would suggest, however, that likely during the interviewing phase that if you were in the slightest conservative that you'd not be asked to continue. So, likely, you'd not be offered a position. I view Google as an enormous echo chamber. There are too many examples of the engine being engineered to deliver the dogma.

 

Fox News employs plenty. Limbaugh, I've no idea. The point is, You've always called Rush Limbaugh and Fox TV a mouthpieces for Republicans and Conservatives, and now we get to call Google a mouthpiece for Liberals and progressives

 

Well put, sir.

 

Except they are mouthpieces.
They are millions of mouthpieces. Each subscriber is their own mouthpiece.
Why aren't you on any of the social media sites?

 

Well, to paraphrase some of our collegues here: Should a jewish business be forced to hire a neo-nazi?

Why should a left leaning business be forced to hire someone who is in opposition to the company philosophy? And before you retort about the baker/gay wedding cake, I was and still am pro baker right to not bake a cake for someone or something he doesn't want to. His business, his rules.

 

This be the only one, my friend