Bombshell: Roy Moore Accuser Beverly Nelson Admits She Forged Yearbook

Great, then I'm sure he'll step right up to defend his name against being named a pedophile.

 

Color me not impressed. On that same day another forensic handwriting analyst from the FBI said he couldn't say they matched. Pretty sure Moore's people, if they had access, could find an "expert" to say they didn't match. A better bet for finding the truth would be for Allred to release the yearbook to an independent lab for the test of ink (s). Strange, she refuses to do that.Why? Also,why can't anyone explain the letters DA after the signature? Damn shame. The ink test test could have been done prior to the election and prove Moore a liar or a truth teller..

 

Go call Moore's lawyer up an tell him that he don't know what he's doing. Better yet, call Moore up and offer to be his lawyer because you sound like the best.

 

As a 16 year old dating an adult she didn't think she was being molested, she was being treated like a woman.....

Besides, He wrote the rest of it, including "Christmas 1977" so she only added the actual day. In her own handwriting. Not much "forgery" going on there.

Meanwhile, one of the women he "never met" gave him his first judicial gavel as a present!
http://www.nationalmemo.com/gave-roy-moore-first-judicial-gavel/

 

We all know why he's not going to say anything under oath. Bill Clinton showed the world why perjury is a crime.

 

As the molester's apologists try a diversion about a lady saying she had added a note to a yearbook that he had inscribed, they run from the pertinent questions (as does Moore):

1) Who is behind the anti-Moore conspiracy about which they fantasize, and how has it been organized?

2) Why have so many individuals in the community with nothing to gain attested, coherently and consistently, to their having been aware of Moore's obsession with teenage girls? (That includes Moore's former associate in the district attorney's office at the time.)

3) How is that investigation that Mrs Moore insisted would soon show that all his accusers had been paid coming along?
​

Of course, their avoiding the cogent questions - that caused Sessions and Shelby,both seasoned Republican Alabama politicians who know Moore very well and are experienced at examining evidence - is understandable.

All they can do, like Moore, is rage against the weight of credible, common testimony, and desperately try to contrive their diversions.

​

 

She tried to support her claim with an entry into her yearbook that she forged. We all saw the Gloria Allred interview, Silly!

David Brooks gets awfully grandiose and contemptuous.

Weird how none of these paragons of moral leadership got all upset about reports of underage prostitutes and Senator Menendez (D-NJ), when Menendez would be replaced by a Republican governor. . . .

 

Your attempt at diversion aside, the pertinent questions that Shelby and Sessions probably asked themselves and led them to conclude that the molester's victims were telling the truth still need to be addressed:

1) Who is behind the anti-Moore conspiracy about which some fantasize, and how has it been organized?

2) Why have so many individuals in the community with nothing to gain attested, coherently and consistently, to their having been aware of Moore's obsession with teenage girls? (That includes Moore's former associate in the district attorney's office at the time.)

3) How is that investigation that Mrs Moore insisted would soon show that all his accusers had been paid coming along?​

 

If he's innocent, why should he do anything beyond he's already doing? To gain credibility with God hating leftists?

Again, to know why he won't, we'd have to know that he won't. And we don't.

 

That forged yearbook entry isn't helping the case much.

So you figure the abortion extremist is going to win?

 

You and Moore can run from the compelling questions that have caused Republicans like Sessions and Shelby to reject Moore, but you can't hide from them:

1) Who is behind the anti-Moore conspiracy about which some fantasize, and how has it been organized?

2) Why have so many individuals in the community with nothing to gain attested, coherently and consistently, to their having been aware of Moore's obsession with teenage girls? (That includes Moore's former associate in the district attorney's office at the time.)

3) How is that investigation that Mrs Moore insisted would soon show that all his accusers had been paid coming along?​

 

I don't doubt that some of these stories are true. But I know Gloria Allred and I don't believe anything she says or anyone that aligns themselves with her. And I will not give her or her money grubbing client a pass when they jump on the chuck wagon.

 

No, to gain credibility with the sane majority in the middle.

He won't. A supposed man of God swearing to God to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth? He won't put himself in that position.

 

The statute of limitations has passed. I'm not a fan of ****ing lawyers, but what money could her client gain?

 

It does seem silly to swear to God to convince liberals who dont believe in God

 

Allred is an Amazon Warrior who makes her money in the wake of famous cases like this that give her free publicity

And I suspect some rich bra burners in lib la la land are donating money to pay Allred’s legal fees for the woman

 

1) Ex-Bush staffer Tim Miller.
2) It's called ephebophilia. Not illegal nor a mental disorder
3) Guy who made that claim committed suicide

Now I ask you:

Do you believe a person has a right to confront his accusers? If, so, doesn't that imply he has a right to confront the evidence?
So why is Ms. Allred refusing to let Moore test the yearbook using an independent lab?

 

....and to gain credibility with sane believers in the middle?

 

Yes, no doubt all ****ing lawyers are scumbags, but I was addressing her "client". What's her motive? Not financial. Certainly not fame. What woman wants to admit she was stupid enough to let herself get partially stripped and her tits groped? She stated she'd told her sister, mother and husband (prior to marriage) of the attack years ago. Let's put all of them up on a stand under oath and see what happens!

 

Why dont the undecided - who may or may not be sane - demand that alred produce the yearbook for expert examination?

 

Just because we have limited information about the female accuser does not mean she isnt harboring a sinister motive

But she has to prove her case rather than moore having to prove his innocence

 

...and the vast majority of believers in the middle? Why not convince them? BTW, where the **** is Moore hiding?

 

That's a great idea. Additionally, let's put them all on the stand, not just Beverly Young, but all of Moore's accusers and, of course, Moore himself. Is that fair enough?

 

Translation: She has no motive and nothing to gain as far as we know.

Awesome. Let's put them all under oath. BTW, it's not just one accuser with a yearbook. She's just one of five. Reminds me of the days when Bill Clinton was running for office and how the accusers were attacked due to partisan politics.

http://time.com/5029172/roy-moore-accusers/
Earlier this month, the Washington Post reported that Republican Alabama Senate candidate Roy Moore initiated a sexual encounter with 14-year-old Leigh Corfmanwhen he was a 32-year-old district attorney. The Post investigation also quoted three other accusers who said that Moore pursued relationships with them when they were between the ages of 16 and 18.

Five other women have since come forward with their own allegations against Moore. The former Alabama state judge has denied the allegations and his campaign has vowed to stay in the Alabama Special Senate election. Moore’s wife, Kayla Moore, has also said her husband will not step down from the Senate race.

 

That will not happen before the election

If allred produces the yearbook and proves authentic then I agree the monkey will be on Moore’s back

But that has not happened