BREAKING: Brennan buried Intel showing Russia wanted Clinton to win

And one of those three did not give high confidence.

 

Alex Jones was right on the Russia hoax.

"House Intelligence Committee staff told me that after an exhaustive investigation reviewing intelligence and interviewing intelligence officers, they found that Brennan suppressed high-quality intelligence suggesting that Putin actually wanted the more predictable and malleable Clinton to win the 2016 election," he added. "Instead, the Brennan team included low-quality intelligence that failed to meet intelligence community standards to support the political claim that Russian officials wanted Trump to win, House Intelligence Committee staff revealed. They said that CIA analysts also objected to including that flawed, substandard information in the assessment."

 

The 17 were merely brainwashed by Brennan's hoax.

 

They didn't even have evidence to support the claim, just a feeling. That came out under oath.

 

Sounds like a fun game, can i play?

Can you imagine if Bat Boy got elected President and did this to Mitch McConnel?

Can you imagine if Omar got elected President and did this to Devin Nunes?

Got any more?

As far as the stuff in the OP?

It seems like Partisan-Driven BS.

That said, anybody (and everybody) who can actually be PROVEN (beyond a reasonable doubt) to have broken the law should be convicted and receive the Max Penalty (up to and including the Death Penalty) if warranted by the circumstances of conviction.

"PROVEN" being the operative word.

Please feel free to get back to me when the Trials and Convictions actually happen.

Thanks in advance.

 

So far all the players have admitted under oath that they had nothing but did the opposite the last three years. Will anyone get prosecuted? Hard to say, it's DC.

Would we like to see someone prosecuted? You bet as this could happen to any President in the future.

 

Liars and Leakers...

 

What documents ?

 

what documents ?

 

What documents show this ?

 

If any crimes can actually be PROVEN, then bring it on.

If there is legal merit, all cases should be prosecuted.

 

Is it against the law for democrats to lie to you? No. Is sedition to try and take down a sitting President illegal? Yes. Will anything happen in the fetid and corrupt atmosphere of DC? Questionable.

Remember the Crowdstrike report that the coup plotters used as fodder for attacking Trump about the DNC servers?

Crowdstrike CEO under oath, "There’s not evidence that they were actually exfiltrated. There's circumstantial evidence but no evidence that they were actually exfiltrated."

Everyone that testified under oath said they had nothing so what caused the Mueller investigation and the FISA warrants? Lies.

 

No.

 

The ones about to be released.

 

Facts. Evidently you only listen to fake news that are not reporting on the recent transcript releases.

 

Putin admitted he wanted Trump to win. Fake news. Move along.

 

If you were concerned about facts, you'd have already fixed the fake quote in your sig. You haven't. You don't.

 

LOL, now you are obsessed after believing all the fake news and dem lies.

 

Fake response. Your sig is still a lie.

 

It's not a quote. There are no quotation marks. It's a very accurate paraphrase.

Here's the quote: “No law-abiding citizen in the United States of America has any fear that their constitutional rights will be infringed in any way.”

That someone's sig line concerns you, but the people you support have been shown to be congenital liars about extremely important issues, and you still support them tells us much about you. Thanx for the insight. smh ...

 

I'm not entertaining your conspiracy theories. No.

 

It is an inaccurate representation. Also, pretty sure even your quote is a paraphrase.

Also, if you think you know who I support, you need to do more homework. Thanx or your additional dishonesty. Smh.

 

BOMBSHELL: Declassified information suggests John Brennan suppressed intel saying Russia preferred Hillary Clinton.

https://twitter.com/BreitbartNews/status/1260604031556345856

 

Did you read the article? Doesn't look like "declassified information." Looks like third hand reporting from a guy saying that's what it "looks like." Meanwhile, Putin admitted he wanted Trump to win. And we had people claiming to work for the Russian government (at least one of which had verifiably done so) attempting to help the Trump campaign.

 

Thanks for proving my point.