BREAKING: Brennan buried Intel showing Russia wanted Clinton to win

Yea, it says Brennan suppressed information that showed Russia actually wanted Hillary Clinton to win.

House Intelligence Committee staff told me that after an exhaustive investigation reviewing intelligence and interviewing intelligence officers, they found that Brennan suppressed high-quality intelligence suggesting that Putin actually wanted the more predictable and malleable Clinton to win the 2016 election.

Instead, the Brennan team included low-quality intelligence that failed to meet intelligence community standards to support the political claim that Russian officials wanted Trump to win, House Intelligence Committee staff revealed. They said that CIA analysts also objected to including that flawed, substandard information in the assessment.

 

That you ascribe to politically convenient conspiracy theories?

 

An anonymous staff member (thought you hated those?). And we don't have their direct account. We have an (at best) a second party account of their anonymous report.

Meanwhile, Putin publicly admitted he wanted Trump to win.

 

Why don't you read the report and accurately quote it. Or is that too difficult for you?

On Tuesday, Henry said that he had obtained independent confirmation of the claims made by Fleitz in that report.

Breitbart News noted in 2017: “[T]he Russians may just as well have preferred Hillary Clinton, who had given Russia everything it wanted while serving as President Barack Obama’s Secretary of State — from the ill-fated “reset,” to a surrender of U.S. missile defenses in Eastern Europe, to the sale of 20% of America’s uranium reserves to a Russian company closely tied to the Russian state.”

“This could be a bombshell,” Henry told Carlson on Tuesday.

 

Indictments should have been brought long ago.

We now know that there was no legal basis for the numerous situations where unmasking occurred.

I hope these Dems start rating on each other. And Obama is evidently right in the thick of it all...

 

And Putin cut a deal with Obama to sneak pipeline equipment into the Crimea via Koch-Glitsch Italia while there were sanctions on Russia for invading the Crimea.

I guess that Putin had the goods on Obama, Biden and Clinton so why would he tell the truth?

 

Brennan should be indicted for this:

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/house-senate-russian-meddoing-dueling-reports-fred-fleitz

The Senate Intelligence Committee report falsely claims that “all analytical lines are supported with all-source intelligence” and that analysts who wrote the intelligence community assessment consistently said they “were under no politically motivated pressure to reach specific conclusions.”

House Intelligence Committee staff members found the opposite. They told me there was conflicting intelligence evidence on Russian motivations for meddling in the 2016 election.

More gravely, they said that CIA Director Brennan suppressed facts or analysis that showed why it was not in Russia’s interests to support Trump and why Putin stood to benefit from Hillary Clinton’s election. They also told me that Brennan suppressed that intelligence over the objections of CIA analysts.

House Intelligence Committee staff told me that after an exhaustive investigation reviewing intelligence and interviewing intelligence officers, they found that Brennan suppressed high-quality intelligence suggesting that Putin actually wanted the more predictable and malleable Clinton to win the 2016 election.

 

Good news:

The DOJ has tapped Connecticut U.S. Attorney John Durham to conduct a review into the origins of the Russia collusion probe. Durham is reportedly looking into Brennan’s role in the collusion hoax.

Fleitz, currently serving as the president of the Center for Security Policy think tank, addressed the heavily redacted bipartisan Senate panel report in his op-ed.

The Senate report directly contradicted the 2018 findings of the investigation by House Intelligence Committee Republicans, who determined that the anti-Trump forces tainted the intelligence community’s assessment that Russia meddled in the elections to help Trump, Fleitz acknowledged

 

I ranted and raved for several YEARS in this Forum, pointing out one reason after another, after another, exactly WHY it would have been advantageous to Russia if Hillary would win the election in 2016. But, I'm a 'nobody', so no one paid any attention to anything I had to say, and many of the libs told me how full of sh!t I was even to think such a thing!

Now, EVERYBODY knows that Putin would have preferred to have had stupid, doctrinaire, corrupt Hillary to play with instead of that thing she would have replaced (the "Messiah").... Putin had already wiped his butt with Obama, and Hillary would have given Putin even more opportunities to make a President of the United States look like a naive fool....

For years I asked myself, "Can I REALLY be the only person in the world who SEES this...?!"

."And, how 'bout a nice, fat contribution to the Clinton Foundation?"

 

I did. Tell me what I got wrong in my last post. I won't hold my breath. There's a reason why you couldn't address the facts before, and there's a reason why you can't do it now.

 

Just the current facts you ignore.

 

No, I saw the facts and my concern is how partisan they are. Why are they that partisan? Because they have an agenda in promoting conspiracy theories to keep their viewership aligned with them. Pretty hard to trust someone else if they're wrong all the time.

 

I'm reminded of the scene in the remake of - Cape Fear - { 1991 }
Where Sam Bowden { Cady's ex-lawyer } is talking to an
Office colleague about Cady's Case.
Sam explains things like how Cady was a Pentecostal cracker.
Could barely read.And then it comes out how Sam
Buried some report.And the colleague kept saying.
" You buried the report.You buried the report,Sam."
As if it was the worst thing a Lawyer could do.

 

Keep in mind one of The first Bureaucrats who made demands about
Conspiracy Theory sites was .. You got it ... Hillary.
Day by day we are unravelling just why that was.
Look up the word Projection

 

I miss your poems. I like how well thought out they are.

 

Like the people under oath saying they had no evidence of collusion but tell a different story in the media for the useful idiots?

 

Ugh you didn't say the thing I wanted you to say. I was going to hit you with Kikuo's You're a useless child. But now I can't.

And yes, exactly like that.

 

An anonymous staff member is incorrect.

The Senate Intelligence Committee report falsely claims that “all analytical lines are supported with all-source intelligence” and that analysts who wrote the intelligence community assessment consistently said they “were under no politically motivated pressure to reach specific conclusions.”

House Intelligence Committee staff members found the opposite. They told me there was conflicting intelligence evidence on Russian motivations for meddling in the 2016 election.

More gravely, they said that CIA Director Brennan suppressed facts or analysis that showed why it was not in Russia’s interests to support Trump and why Putin stood to benefit from Hillary Clinton’s election. They also told me that Brennan suppressed that intelligence over the objections of CIA analysts.

House Intelligence Committee staff told me that after an exhaustive investigation reviewing intelligence and interviewing intelligence officers, they found that Brennan suppressed high-quality intelligence suggesting that Putin actually wanted the more predictable and malleable Clinton to win the 2016 election.

 

Actually, that report was put together by a select few people from the intel agencies.

You'd recognize the names.

 

Anonymous Intelligence staff are still anonymous. Anonymous is still correct. You cited no specific, named person who backs up your claim. That means anonymous. Do you not know what the word "anonymous" means?

 

shhh...dont try to quell a good conspiracy theory

I love how they fall for these conspiracy theories that say that the Russians were trying to help Hillary, when the FACTS, and pretty much all of the evidence claims the opposite. The entire method/mode of the Trump administration is: If you dont like the message, change the messenger until you get one that give you the message you want.The have done that in the every branch of the government, and the last one was the DOJ.

 

ALL ROADS LEAD BACK TO JOHN BRENNAN: Before ‘takedown’ of General Flynn, he was planning to audit John Brennan for running billions ‘off the books.’

 

This is the same dude who ran a hacking operation into Congress...and then LIED about it. There's much the intelligence community under the Obama Administration has to answer for, be it under a grand jury, a criminal trial or a congressional hearing.

 

Well... maybe I'm not totally crazy after all. I posted here in this forum literally dozens of times that the Russians would have greatly preferred to sit opposite a delusional, corrupt, self-righteous, stupid old 'ex-hippie-chick' like Hillary Clinton.

And this was not (NOT) because Vladimir Putin thought that Trump was an intellectual marvel... but -- whereas Hillary would have been perfectly predictable, Trump was very UN-predictable, erratic, temperamental, and therefore potentially dangerous. Of course, then, it is only logical that a wise, experienced political chess player like Vlad would rather deal a STOOPID 'quantity' like Hillary.

 

The Obama Administration was one long vicious attack on the sovereignty of the American People.