Breaking: Yovanovitch communicated with Dem staffer

You got it all wrong (no surprise there, is it?) Contrary to a popular belief, it is the President of the United States who makes US foreign policy; the rest of the surrogates and other small people are there to implement it. Not the other way around

 

What will Democrats think of next?

 

You guys have it wrong, as usual...

Here's the sequence

Carey Emails Ambassador on 8/14 - The FIRST Email
Ambassador responds on 8/15 - Saying the State Department would be in touch
Carey responds on 8/19 - Thanks - The SECOND Email
Ambassador didn't respond to The SECOND Email, as she said in her testimony



You guys REALLY suck at this... Don't let Faux News do your thinking for you....

 

It was a good thing for the United States that Trump has fired her?

 

I luv the fact that the left have no friggin' idea just how hilarious that ^ is.

 

WTF are you on about here.

You keep trying to claim innocence because someone else is fo the opposite political party, yet you never address the claims. The claim was that he held congressionally approved funds for a foreign country, in exchange for an investigation into a political rival.....cut to Trump releasing the transcription memo of the call, and LO AND BEHOLD HE DID JUST THAT

How about we talk about the facts, and not the political affiliations of who said what. Let the facts play out.

 

Sounds like the FISA application all over again

 

Mic drop

From everything written about the Ambassador, she was a career state department employee w hi served her country well. Her career spanned many Presidents if both parties and was well respected by them. I find it odd that the Trump crowd would attempt to create a false narrative that she is anything but a solid civil servant.

Again the guy is a **** leader

 

Witness integrity is always pertinent

 

And the rest of the story is ...
Fox News’ Gregg Re later reported that Yovanovitch replied to the staffer, identified by Fox News as Laura Carey, saying she “would love to reconnect and look forward to chatting with you.”

You guys REALLY suck at this... Don't let fake newz do your thinking for you....

 

How is their political affiliation affecting their integrity ?

By that standard, then every republican is lying to support him then, right ?

 

Pick it up. You're embarrassing yourself.

 

That dude owned all your asses.

He provided objective evidence that’s the Ambassador was honest and forthcoming.

Not to be to surprised she has been a top notch employee at the State Department for decades.

 

This st it! 5this is the proof d'jour that the president's admitted and confirmed behavior never happened!

 

It's what Democrats do.

 

Whoa.... looki who' da bak! We missed yea

 

Can you logically explain the reasoning with critical thinking?

 

You can fart past the graveyard if that is what you need to do, of course.

 

No, the "dude" left out the most important part - that she did, if fact, respond in writing, “would love to reconnect and look forward to chatting with you.”

Lee Zeldin said:
" ... Yovanovitch, when I asked her specifically what the staffer was looking to speak about, did not provide these details.”

“I specifically asked her whether the Democratic staffer was responded to by Yovanovitch or the State Department,” Zeldin concluded. “It is greatly concerning that Ambassador Yovanovitch didn’t answer my question as honestly as she should have, especially while under oath.”

 

That won't stop Fake Don from blaming his bum kissers for the perversion of foreign policy in the interests of his personal political agenda that is being exposed.

Attempts to slime dedicated public servants Vindman, Yovanovich, Volker, Kent, etc., etc., etc. will not work - especially given the statrk ethical contrast with Giuliani, Parnas, and Fruman.

As much of the truth as possible (despite Fake Don's desperately trying to hide it) must me exposed, the Senate issue it's pass to Fake Don, and the American People, for whom knowledge is good, issue their verdict.

 

Your post exhibits a profound lack of civics knowledge.

 

Um, no. My comment was dripping sarcasm openly mocking the philosophy that the never ending stream of minor nonsense somehow vindicates the shitbaggery of the president.

 

Thanks... I thought that was a pretty simple debunk myself.... I read her testimony earlier this week and remembered that exchange with Zeldin... She never said she never responded (as politeness would dictate)..

Frankly, even if she had responded to the SECOND email, with a polite response that didn't indicate substance, and didn't remember in her testimony, I would have no problem with that either.

These people are staring a single ant with a magnifying glass while the rest of the ants are eating their lunch 2 feet away....

 

I conclude she committed perjury. She needs to be prosecuted, like Gen. Flynn, right?

 

She was asked a direct question and didn't answer it truthfully.