Can Trump Be Forced To Accept A 2020 Loss?

So much **** thrown at Trump daily, and he’ still goes about Making America Great Again daily... my hat is off to him

 

An attempt at coup has happened and was directed at president Trump.

 

Thankfully, Hillary lost so we'll never find out....

 

Can Hillary be forced to accept a 2016 loss. So far no.

Dems are stellar at projection.

 

I hope he doesn't.. I hope he goes all dictator, would be fun to watch

 

If he runs, he will probably win.

 

And she's an idiot for saying so.

 

TDS alive and well with many people on this forum.

 

Nobody but a very seasoned politician has got a chance dealing with Trump on either the campaign trail or in debates since he's a loose cannon and relentlessly attacks. If Biden were not going senile then he would have a chance. Harris simply isn't experienced enough to take it to the national stage and win. Warren MIGHT have the political chops and the experience at this point to deal with Trump. Bernie has already been given a thumb down by Nancy Pelosi when she ordered Dem Party presidential candidates to cling to the middle of the political road during the primaries and pretend that the Dem Party is NOT the party of insane radicalism. The DNC will probably politically 'take care' of Bernie if he manages to hang in there to the middle of the primaries. But we shall see.

 

Dude. I remember when you said this:

 

/

 

It's a strategic attempt at getting Democrats to vote for a moderate candidate like Biden.

 

Of course not.

(1) Trump will win all 50 states
(2) We will all agree to name him Commander Ruler of The Milky Way... and beyond.
(3) We will have the Dali Llama and the Pope grant him dual immortality
(4) The thought that anyone can remain in the White House after losing an election is just stupid.

 

(2) I always thought Zorg, Ruler of the Galaxy would be a better title.

 

You could have stopped at 'And she's an idiot'..

 

We witnessed they were right.
The US quitted JCPOA. Involved militarily in the Syria, arrested and deported many travellers to the USA, denied entrance to many traveller's, taken to and defeated from Iran in the international court, helps KSA fight Yemenis, closed the US government for 6 weeks, tries to squeeze Iranian people and government, and now plans to attack Iran.
What has he done in return?

 

JCPOA was a bad deal from the start.
Obama involved the military in Syria in September of 2014 with air strikes. US ground troops (50) first entered Syria in late 2015.
People entering the country illegally are not "travelers".
Trump denied entry to the US from countries that did not have adequate vetting.
Both parties are responsible for the closure of the Government.
Support your claim that Trump "plans on attacking Iran".

 

You are in the wrong thread. For that matter why are you even here?
Read the rules and don't deflect from the subject.

 

Why do you say so?
It was exaclty along the subject

 

Fearmongering is all the left has left....truly a sign of desperation

 

What does your rambling about what you don't like about Trump and relations with your country have to do with
Can Trump Be Forced To Accept A 2020 Loss?, Nothing.

 

full employment

 

He reportedly is moving an aircraft carrier warship towards Iran.
No, just Trump was responsible for the govt. closing. He closed it just because of funding the Mexico wall not fulfilled.
Vetting is the job of the U.S.A embassadors.
They arrested and deported people in the AIRPORT, which means they were legal travellers.
U.s ground troops increased to 2000 (49-plied).

 

Answers the quoted post

 

I'm not so sure about that. Looking at the generic Democratic vs. Trump, question 17. 85% of democrats say generic Democrat, 5% Trump. In 2016 it was 89% Hillary 8% Trump. Very close to what happened in 2016. Republicans, 83% Trump 6% Generic democrat. In 2016 it was 88% Trump, 8% Hillary. Again close to the same. Independents, 29% generic democrats, 27% Trump with 22% it depends and 22% would not vote. In 2016 it was 46% of independents voting Trump, 42% Hillary with 12% voting third party against both Trump and Hillary.

https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/g7xsqei38g/econTabReport.pdf

The switch in independents from a plus 4 for Trump in 2016 to a minus 2 today, a six point drop is very encouraging to the Democrats. The big monster in the room are the 22% which state it depends which could switch independents back to 2016 status. It depends basically means it depends on who is the democratic candidate. Who wins the Democratic nomination. A candidate which independents like, are attracted to, most of that 22% goes democratic. A candidate disliked by those 22% it depends, Trump could win the majority of them or they could just vote third party ala 2016.

It's still very early, a lot can change. But with the right candidate, attractive to independents as Hillary wasn't, the democrats could win in a landslide. One that is disliked as much as Trump was/is or more by independents, another 2016 is possible. It's 100% up to the Democrats to figure out who, which candidate can keep those independents that have come over to their side and add more.

For independents, it all boils down to candidates matter. Party not so much. It's the candidates that determine who independents vote for in the general. It's up to the Democrats who choose and vote for their nominee during their primaries to figure out which one has the best change of winning over independents, which Hillary couldn't and the best chance of winning the general which independents decide the winner. Not each party's base vote.