Chick-fil-A location at DIA paused after Denver Council cites chain's LGBT stances

you responded to a yes/no with a disertation on why you refuse to answer yes/no.


I didn't want you to compare why familiar relationships are not like SSM relationships.... (although, you have no issues trying to draw comparisons to inter-racial relationships when it's convenient)

I want to know, can you not support another set of people from marrying (currently, the only ones left are familiar and polygomists) but still not hate them


We already know, you don't support familiar relationships, but you don't hate them.... and now are trying everything to avoid saying that, because it would confirm what I had been saying from page 1, that while CFA CEO didn't support SSM, that didn't mean he hated gays who were trying to get married, it just meant, he didn't support SSM


much like you don't support familiar marraige, but don't hate the siblings who are trying to marry under the same #lovewins hashtag the SSM community created.

 

I respond the way I want to respond. And I have responded. And it remains:

It is without any doubt that incest and homosexuality have nothing in common. Backward retards from the 1950's claimed pedophiles are like homosexuals with their flawed comparisons / interracial is like bestiality according to flawed comparisons of the exceptionally racists. This is not any different than fanatic haters making a new flawed comparison.


Your problem is, that you're looking like a fanatic hater like that backward 1950's police officer saying homosexuals are pedophiles / fanatic racist saying interracial is like bestiality.

 

mighty tolerant of you to use the R-word. do you hate "retards".


for such an 'open-minded' person, you sure are hateful to groups of mentally disabled people. are
you going to try and justify hating them for not liking gays.





apparently, once again, protection should only apply to YOUR pet group, huh

 

I never said they have things in common. And you didn't answer the question as I knew you wouldn't.

 

It's relevant when you claim the guy doesn't run restaurants, but obviously did.
And claimed he discriminates against gays, but doesn't.

In your head.
Because you ignore the fact that you're wrong, no matter how many times it's shown.

Cathy doesn't donate to anti-gay groups.... even the gays applauded him and started eating there again.

Contact your brethren and get with the times.

Trolling ridiculous comments, out.
Crispy Chicken Deluxe and waffle fries, in !

 

Actually all he did was donate money to an organization that fought against SSM. Here is the bottom line:

Chik-Fil-A does not discriminate against hiring homosexuals.
Chik-Fil-A does not discriminate against serving homosexuals.

Now I have boycotted Chik-Fil-A based on the fact the owner of the company is anti-SSM, however, that is my personal choice and not something I want a city council to enforce as long as there is no discrimination against homosexuals by the company.

In this instance though there was a VALID concern that they were not opened on Sundays so they cannot serve travelers during that time in a place that should accommodate seven days a week. However, that is not how the council chose to proceed. Instead they based their protest on a faulty premise.

 

I thought it was just the one angry lesbian. Were there others too ?

Lol... too true.

​

 

just the one, but she was the one leading the charge.

 

They knew they were closed Sunday and selected them because they make the airport more money in 6 days, than other similar vendors do in 7 days.

 

No, but marriage between two people of the same sex and marriage between two closely related people of the same sex have in common, marriage between two people of the same sex. And the contrast is that one is allowed by law in all 50 states, while the other is prohibited in all 50 states. What is the source of this hatred of yours towards people who are closely related?

 

how much the franchise owner makes isn't the concern for the airport. The airport gets rent, but after that they don't get a cut of the profits....I think not having all the businesses open on a particular day of the week could be a problem. It's a legit concern for any mall, airport, etc, that opens to the public 7 days a week. The lesbian in charge of it would rather make a political statement and try and deny CFA over the SSM issue, because denying them on the 6 day a week issue isn't as pious.


This is politics 101.... even if she didn't care about it being a 6 day a week business, and wanted to punish them because of the SSM issue.... you use the 6 day a week thing and then when conservatives complain, she says "IDK what you're talking about... my lifestyle and CFA's opposition to me marrying who I love has nothing to do with the decision.... " Then you still get to preach your agenda, and still get to deny CFA for nefarious reasons.


I don't have to hire you because you are gay... but I damn sure better not tell you that is the reason I didn't hire you. I better come up with a generic answer.... "thank-you for your interest, but we have decided to offer the position to another candidate, please keep an eye on the job board for future openings" (something like that)


I can absolutely deny making you a wedding cake.... but I better not say "I don't support SSM, so I can't bake that cake" I better come up with a generic "I'm sorry, due to high demand, I will be unable to meet the demand for your time/date, sorry for the inconvenience"

 

Like I said

And from the article

Concession fees are generally a percentage.

 

Writes the person whose avatar is clearly about hating homosexuality

 

There is no "but" after the no. There is nothing in common between the 2. The end.
What stands is that there is a comparison being made that is completely flawed. It just as bad as making a comparison of interracial and bestiality / pedophilia and homosexuality.

- - - Updated - - -

Reason enough to not want a company who lobbies for Christian sharia law.

 

Homosexuality should be hated. It's against God. It's perversion.

 

Than the question is irrelevant. And no feed the troll with off topic nonsence.

But it's still exceptionally obvious to me that question is a start to draw a parallel and making a homosexual relationship equal to incest, like some made homosexuality equal to pedophilia, like some made interracial equal to bestiality. Such clearly flawed nonsense comes from hate organisations. Organisations financially supported by this food chain.

 

No such thing as Christian sharia law. It's a useful term to demonize Christians, however.

- - - Updated - - -

Yeah, like the hate against Christians.

 

He's not running this franchise in question, hence irrelevant.

It's a link in the OP where it states:
Last year, Cathy said publicly that he regretted inserting the company into political debates. Its foundations also cut back on donations to groups that some considered anti-gay.

The amount is cut back. Not ended.
So there are still donations being made to hate organisations.
That is the problem.

 

That entire gays may not marry is clearly a fundamental ultra conservative Christian/Jewish train of thought.
Don't make me laugh by claiming it aint so. Abrahamic religious text are far from flattering towards homosexuals.

Be gone with your Christian Sharia laws.

 

Sure there is. YOU are off on your own tangent comparing incest to homosexuality when in fact EVERYBODY else is comparing marriage between two people of the same sex and marriage between two closely related people.

 

Yes, marriage has always been defined as a male and female in the United States until recently. That's not Christian Sharia law, however. Like I said, it's a useful term to demonize Christians.

 

Marriage is limited to men and women because only they can become husbands and wives, fathers and mothers to their children. Has nothing to do with hatred of homosexuals. All the birds around here, pair off each spring, one male and one female, to join together to build their nest, incubate their young and provide and care for them. Do you think birds do this because they hate homosexuals? Or is it instead a function of biology?

 

Even Pagan Fertility rituals recognize that fertility is limited to a man and a woman. The biology of procreation is universal across all of human civilization.

 

What you describe is incest.
wikipedia:
Incest is sexual activity between family members or close relatives.

I am NOT making that comparison. The gay hating squad is, by asking that question.

 

Actually, they would be equally opposed to two heterosexuals of the same sex marrying and equally supportive of two homosexuals of the opposite sex marrying, because it has nothing to do with sexuality. A man and a woman of any sexuality can procreate and two people of the same sex of any sexuality cannot.