But how can someone know what's going on in the world if they don't read the Russian media... unless they get on to a foreign language site that is not owned by the American corporations. All the corporate media presents is the bits and pieces that suits them, and then distracts the readers with more important things... like Kardashian's rear end for instance.
Oh so that's what he was doing, roaming about Moscow late at night. He was looking for gay lovers, and here the Russians thought he was 'spying' around.
Unbelievable isn't it....people who claim to be Americans searching the anti-American Russia news organizations for what they claim is the "truth". In the past such despicable louts were called traitors to their country and dealt with accordingly.
But you don't read Russian media. How can you wether to believe or not to believe? It's not Russian media. It's official representative of Russian FM. She said the US asked Russian authorities to provide police protection for the embassy. The US has never disproved Zakharova's words.
So....people can still understand the nature of Fascists without reading Hitler's 'Mein Kampf'....and we certainly don't need to read Russian state controlled media to the realize bias in their stories.
Oh, so if people are told that Russian media is biased, then they must accept it as fact and not question the ones who are saying it? Interesting! Isn't that a brainwashing method?
But how do you know if Russians lie if you don't read what they are saying and writing, and find that it is contradicts proven facts or what they had said before? - - - Updated - - - But most of the media in Russia is foreign owned so how can it be state controlled?
Isn't the thread title a lie? Seems even you Russians are admitting the policeman attacked the American Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The agent didn't show any identification and had his face covered so the guard had to stop him before entering the building. When he grabbed him the agent shoved the policeman with his elbow. The policeman reacted the way he was supposed to react... after all the agent could have been a terrorist. That said, I think there is more to this than meets the eye since he is not the only one that was told to leave Russia. I know the American embassy said he left because of a broken shoulder, which I find doubtful since the pain would have overpowered him. Another CIA agent was also told to leave, so the US retaliated by sending home two Russian diplomats. From what I gathered, it was some kind of operation that went awry. Maybe he had information on him that he didn't want to fall into the hands of the FSB. The question of course arises, why didn't he just show his ID since he was a diplomat? I mean do diplomats always cover their faces and rush to get inside an embassy door late at night? I don't think so. I know there is a big crackdown now in Russia on bribery and corruption because of the elections coming up, to the point where they are thinking of having all state officials undergo lie detector tests. ..after all, what nation wants to turn into a second Ukraine. Heaven help us!
Mein Kampf has a little to do with "the nature of Fascists", actually. Have never heard that reading the Mein Kampf can give such an understanding. Read what yoyu want. Chilcot report in Great Britain causes public outrage. People have found out that the then prime-minister lied them and decieved the nation on the Iraq issue. At least after 13 years the Brits know the truth. This is how democracy works.
Of course the title is a lie....when has that Russian regime ever stated something that wasn't totally or partially dishonest. Just look at their leader....a KGB agent, trained in propaganda & subversion.
Making blank statements repetitively, and calling people names doesn't mean what you're saying is true. Isn't it one of Goebbels brain washing methods?
This is one of my first memories of Russia lies. "August 29, a U-2 spy plane on reconnaissance over Cuba brought back evidence that surface-to-air (SAM) missiles had been installed at locations in Cuba. While not themselves offensive weapons, their installation indicated Cubas strong desire to defend those locations. Soviet Ambassador Anatoly Dobrynin advised Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy, who was one of President Kennedy's closest advisors, that the installations were entirely defensive in nature. But in fact, MRBMs began to arrive 11 days later."
The truth of the matter is that Russia/Soviets lie and are dishonest.....they cannot be trusted, they are aggressive in nature and will stab you in the back without the slightest hesitation. President Reagan always used to say when dealing with Russia: "trust but verify"...I say never trusted them!