Clapper Sings – Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper Tells CNN Obama Ordered the T

First one of the seditious insiders to tie Obama into the setup, it sure does.

 

NOTHING BURGER ALERT!

President Obama would have been derelict in his sworn duty to our nation if he had NOT requested that an investigation was made into FOREIGN INTERFERENCE with a general election.

Fortunately Obama was on the ball and did his duty which has resulted in many of the CRIMINALS surrounding the BLOTUS being indicted and convicted.

Those criminals would have gotten away with their crimes if it was left up the INCOMPETENT BLOTUS.

Good job, Obama!

 

Indicted and convicted of nothing to do with the investigation.

On the other hand, the investigation revealed a cavalcade of Obama sycophants like Clapper, Brennan, etc., who most certainly need to be brought to justice.

 

see post #18 ... and here's another sorta IRONIC! comment I posted yesterday ...

 

False, of course, and out of context.
Article wrong that Clapper said Obama is behind Trump Russia ...

https://www.politifact.com/.../article-wrong-clapper-said-obama-behind-trump-russ/

 

https://www.politifact.com/punditfa...e-wrong-clapper-said-obama-behind-trump-russ/

 

Sorry ... none of that hot mess is the slightest bit compelling. It's a binary choice that Clapper's proclamtion proposes. Obama was complicit in campaign meddling, or Obama was Clinton's useful idiot. Steele hadn't yet managed to peddle his tinfoil hat conspiracy, even to the seediest tabloids. Only Clinton's stooges had Steele's completely uncorroborated fairy tale that Clapper submitted as "credible intelligence". Honestly ... I'll gladly accept either of the 2 explanations. ::

 

Yet, nothing on collusion, the whole reason for the investigation based on the unverified dossier. The Mueller report verifies there was no reason for the investigation in the first place. Time to investigate those that started this under false pretenses.

 

I know that it must be a DIFFICULT concept for BLOTUS supporters to grasp because even just the idea of having a COMPETENT president in the Whitehouse who actually KNOWS what he is doing is UNIMAGINABLE for them.

Obama did EXACTLY what NEEDED to be done to PROTECT our nation.

It was YOUR OWN GOP that started the investigation into Russian collusion LONG AFTER Obama was gone.

Try sticking with the FACTUAL TIMELINE for a change!

 

The factual timeline is the Hillary campaign paid for data from Russians to use as opposition research against Trump, the insiders used the unverified dossier to start an FBI investigation and spying on Trump before the election then used it to start the Special Counsel investigation after. The same people that protected Hillary from prosecution for her crimes.

Mueller found nothing on collusion.

Time to find out who started all of this and make sure this does not happen again.

 

If you're going to lecture on timelines, get yours straight 1st. Washington Free Beacon hired Fusion GPS. Steele wasn't working with Fusion GPS at the time, nor was Fusion investigating "Russiagate". Collusion was only speculated upon LONG AFTER the Free Beacon cut Fusion GPS loose. Your yammerin' about Obama's presidential obligation to permit illegal surveillance and entrapment schemes is some real funny sh!t.

 

Hopefully this means it’s ok for Trump to spy on the Democratic presidential contenders. We need to know about the people who want to lead this country.

 

The Mueller report verifies nothing of the sort. Where there is suspicion there should be an investigation. When it is over, you don't investigate the investigators.
That is why there are investigations to arrive at the truth. The police investigate leads every day, many of which lead to nowhere. Are we to investigate the police?
Let's face the fact that Trump has been involved in numerous nefarious activities.

 

Based on opposition research that was unverified as admitted to Congress by Comey. No predicate crime for the investigation to start in the first place. You don't start investigating and spying on Americans based on no evidence.

 

Who is CNN? Are they like an entertainment newsie kind of place?? I can't say that I've tuned them for years. Like so many other folks, their brand of marketing just doesn't measure up to their past. It's sad really. I read a quote recently about what Ted thinks about the new owners and the castration of his creature. He isn't amused.

The Schiff show we're being treated to these days was all premised on no one breaking ranks with Obama. now, it looks like everyone for themselves, and it looks more and more like the Obama administration, and perhaps Obama himself will enjoy some quality time front and center in court rooms around the nation.

 

There was evidence of election tampering and that is cause for an investigation.

 

There is NO evidence of election tampering other that the Hillary campaign and the seditious insiders.

 

There is evidence that those accusations of election tampering were manufactured by our own government in order to invalidate a duly elected president, and that is cause for an investigation. Do you agree?

 

It never ceases to amaze me how dimwitted some sources are on their reporting. The Intelligence Community assessment Clapper is referring to was published January 6th of 2017, you can read the whole assessment here https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf

The Special Counsel investigation/Mueller probe on the other hand wasn't ordered until May of 2017. Obviously what Clapper is saying is the Intelligence Community assessment set off a sequence of events that lead to the Mueller probe.

There is a reason why bigger media sources wouldn't discuss this story. The story itself is clumsy reporting

 

Which provided no evidence of much of anything since it was a general outline how hackers work and it was never presented to Homeland Security but only signed off on by two agencies, and the third did not support the conclusion.

 

No it doesn't. Big difference between “Trump-Russia Spying Operation” and an "investigation into FOREIGN INTERFERENCE,” the former is what it morphed into and the latter was necessary.

The operation to get Trump, and undermine our election on behalf of Hillary Clinton and the DNC (who colluded with a foreign agent with Russian help), or "insurance policy" came later, and even if an IG report clears the FBI...it is perfectly reasonable never to believe they did not try to overthrow our government.

Topics like this do not help. Get the facts straight first, I DO NOT like being seen on the side of the TREASONOUS "liberal" swine.

 

You are wrong about that. The spying on Trump started before the election. Everything else after was fodder to start a special counsel to investigate Trump.

 

Why in heaven would the mainstream (competent) media investigate this farce? It's an obvious eye-roll toward people who grab a headline and run with it before reading the whole story.

 

Which never required a special counsel to indict and it was fodder for the conspiracy theorists to keep the special counsel investigation going and useless since no Russian will ever see the inside of a courtroom. Mueller knew there was no collusion August 2017 so pivoted to obstruction; thus, the clarifying letter from Rosenstein. The collusion delusion needed to be maintained.

 

Sorta exactly like what Clapper alleges Obama did? Why in heaven would Obama run with it before reading the whole story? Cue the eye-roll >>