CNN Reacts to Ossoff’s Humiliating Loss

The Russians hacked Mother Earth!!!

 

Here is how pathetic CNN is.


CNN consoles Dems: 'FAIL' stands for 'Future Always Involves Learning'....


CNN host Chris Cuomo said Wednesday that Democrats will have to learn from their recent failures if they're going to ever capture any House seats from Republicans.

"They teach you in campaign school ... that you've gotta learn from failure, otherwise you're doomed to repeated it," Cuomo said.

"And there's an acronym for 'fail': the Future Always Involves Learning. And that's going to be the test ... for Democrats, right?" he asked......snip~

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/c...ture-always-involves-learning/article/2626602

 

She didn't sing did she?

 

LMAO.....barely won 52% to 48.1%



Jon Ossoff spent six times more than Karen Handel but complains about 'money in politics'.....


Either Democrat Jon Ossoff wasn't paying attention or he's really bad at math though. Before the special election polls closed, the 30-year-old aspiring boy wonder went on NPR to complain about money in politics.

"The role of money in politics is a major problem and particularly the role of unchecked anonymous money," Ossoff said. "There have been super PACs in Washington who have been putting up tens of millions of dollars of attack ads in air for months now."

And then with just a day to go and apparently un-ironically, Ossoff offered up the most unaware statement of the entire race: "We need campaign finance reform."

Simple arithmetic shows the stupidity of that sentiment. According to campaign finance documents compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics, Ossoff spent six times more money than Handel. His campaign raised more than $24 million to her $4.5 million.

At that point, Ossoff groupies will protest that Handel benefited from super PAC spending. After all, they argue, the Republican benefited from $18.2 million in outside spending compared to the Democrat's $8 million from outside groups.

But while it's true that dark money donors were with her, that cash only helped Handel narrow the gap. It didn't make up the difference. If you take the sum of campaign and outside spending together, it's clear that millions more flowed to Ossoff's cause......snip~

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/j...lains-about-money-in-politics/article/2626628

 

I have plenty of chips left.

 

Rachel Maddow would melt in the rain.

 

I walk where I walk and as a Reform Party member who isn't an ideologue can choose which side of the issues I think best without letting a political party decide for me.

 

I'll post here as well since this thread seems to be acceptable:

LIBERALS:


Are your constant predictions of winning causing gastronomical discomfort?
Is the pain of seeing your press failing you causing digestive issues?
ARE you a member of the media reduced to tears because you are no longer getting your own way
like a two-year old throwing a tantrum?

WE CAN HELP!


Phillips Milk of Magnesia!

When you're so full of **** that even your own audience feels uneasy watching you on CNN.

Now in a new baby formula bottle for Millennials.​

 

So can any of you daily CNN watchers please tell me who those people are? So far nobody has said who they are, or why the OP is noteworthy.

 

I don't know how it works over in your universe but over in this one the Democrats and Republicans
spend money on camapaigns to elect their own people.

The Republicans had to spend over $20 million on this seat that they should have had a lock on.

They didn't.

The Democrats lost.

Oh well.

They have a couple billion more worth of chips.

 

Your "chips" are dwindling and the re-buys are not coming well for you.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/democrats-had-the-worst-may-fundraising-since-2003/article/2626603

Your fund raising is garbage. America is rejecting your ideology.

 

I haven't spent one dime.

 

Actually it was democrats who spent a insane amount of money on this race which came out of state.
But don't let facts get in your way.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive...eorgia-6th-most-expensive-house-election.html

 

Wow. Nice to hear what you think of your fellow Americans. No wonder the fringe is all your party can win.


The United Counties of Liberal America. UCLA. I like it!

 

Surprised it took 'em til 2 pm the day after to feed you that line.

 

Overwhelming Republican district goes.... gosh... Republican!


And now the only thing you have left until 2018 is Trump making excuses for firing the SP.

 

Trump barely won it and now the Republicans are shifting it back as opposed to the Democrats who thought they had it this time. Their guy won the primary by over 50% and she got 20% and then came back to whop him.

 

More Americans voted for Clinton than Trump.

 

It was in a conservative district where the Republicans have held the seat for over 20yrs, what was so humiliating about it?

 

LOL- Their pain is my joy.

Gleefully yours,

Mr. Schadenfreude

 

It would seem that $23 million dollars can buy a lot of things, but it can't buy a DNC congressional seat in freaking Georgia. I thought we all laughed when Hillary was campaigning in Georgia, but not in Wisconsin. Have they legit not changed their playbook, at all, since November? How do you have the worst election strategy in history, lose bad, then keep following months later?

I have never seen either party in these kind of shambles. The Democrats are losing left and right. The ones that win, are like 600 years old. This party may literally die off in the next few election cycles.

 

Wouldnt be so bad if he hadnt run on a Trump Resistance platform.

 

I remember when it was predicted that the Republicans would die off because they were losing left and right. In 1976. In 1992. In 2006. In 2008. Luckily none of those predictions came true. The pendulum swings in this country.

 

I'm surprised the liberal talking heads weren't dressed in black.

 

And Democrats wasted tens of millions of dollars thinking they could win it!

Sheer........"progressive".........genius........

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!