Colby Covington's latest round of race-baiting draws ire of UFC fighters, Reebok

Not what I said at all. Read again.

I said your 1st link didn't show anything you claimed when checked out further.
When the 1st link you provide fails, what sense does it make to continue.
If you don't provide reputable links, there's no reason I should waste hours checking out all false BS.

Provide good links if you want people to check them out. Especially the 1st link you provide. I would assume the 1st link to be the best link, certainly not the worst.

I admit your 1st link was a waste of time and didn't check out.
So, again, your BLM claim is yours and trumps alone.

 

I provided the links. Just bevause you don't like them that doesn't male it my problem. Everyone on here cries about and dismisses every link that doesn't fit their view. I'm not catering to every single person's personal preference. You dislike my links then provide your own disproving them. And BLM being a terrorist group is not a claim, it's a fact. They're a hate a group and it's that simple.

 

I didn't dismiss it. I checked it out.
I didn't like it because it was not confirmed.
BLM being a terrorist group is your personal opinion.

 

What is the definition of terrorism?

 

That's an ass kicking if there ever was one.

 

By the way... I love how when BLM is part of a protest where violence occurs, it’s not BLM’s fault and they’re not a bad group. But when you folks want to count the number of “peaceful protests”, all BLM has to do is have a small tiny fraction of that group and they’re peaceful.

 

BLM causing violence and destruction is not an opinion. They've been doing it for the last few months and trying to intimidate people. That's terrorism.

 

It's in the dictionary.
Dictionary's are online now.

I use words as defined in the dictionary.

 

Not even close.
The very 1st link at this point is BS. It didn't check out, it could NOT be confirmed.
Fake news.

 

Terrorism is defined in the Code of Federal Regulations as “the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives”

How many sources would you like for BLM advocates and leaders stating that property crime is acceptable and not true “violence”?

 

What? Explain please.

My only claim is BLM is not a terror group any more than supporters of tRUMP are. Just because a person like Cruz killed HS students doesn't make all supporters of tRUMP killers of HS kids.
Just because someone has a certain skin color, doesn't make them BLM.

This isn't rocket science.

 

So you say. I reject your opinion.

 

BLM advocate?

How about from BLM? I am aware of the one dude from NYC making a statement. I also stated he should be removed.
BLM as an organization is not promoting terror.

Has trump called BLM a terrorist group? Has the gov't labeled them a terrorist group? I don't think so, why have they not?

 

I beg to differ

https://www.fox10phoenix.com/news/a...t-behind-chicago-looters-after-60m-in-damages

 

Ass kicking.

 

You reject facts. A BLM organizer just hit a hit a couple of people with her car in a parking lot. Terrorists.

 

I reject your opinion.

 

BLM needs to come out against riots and violence. They need to make it widely known.
They need to be more like MLK and advocate for peaceful protests.

Has trump or our gov't labeled them terrorists?

 

You reject facts. A BLM organizer just hit a couple of people with her car in a parking lot. Terrorists.

 

They hadn’t labeled KKK terrorists until the other day.

 

They don’t want to come out against riots and violence because that’s their modus operandi. Which is why they’re bailing them out of jail.

 

They will cease to exist if they don't stand against violence.
I don't see it as their modus operandi, at this point. But it could be if they don't condemn violence.
The ball is in their court.

 

Only took about 150 yrs?