No....a great many women though would. Mind you, we are not judging people......only their illusions. It's o.k. you can wear drag in adult settings if you like.
I'm not religious but I do know that the Catholic church is not a pedophile organization. The fact that you need to make that conflation means you have no point in the first place. Kids should not be exposed to the unnatural filth that is "drag queens". Their entire raison d'etre is perversion.
Of course....I am spot on! I USE the English language. I don't throw it around unlike "Progressives". "It all depends on what the meaning of is is." "Men can be girls and girls can be boys"
Dressing up and skimpy clothing sexually gyrating in front of children should be considered deviant by all people. But sadly of course there are some that would try to say that it isn't
Try the dictionary Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more de·vi·ant adjective departing from usual or accepted standards, especially in social or sexual behavior. "deviant behavior"
Back to the same question, who gets to define what is "deviant" and does "deviant" automatically mean "bad"?
there are plenty of other examples but they are too nauseating to search for so if you want to see more you'll have to find it yourself https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...queen-sees-performer-spreading-legs-kids.html
There are certainly deviant acts that heterosexual adults engage in. That should also be kept in the privacy of ones bedroom and away from kids.
Hey. Whatever floats your boat. That culture wouldn’t survive very long if you know the basics of reproduction. They better have a great system of creating test tube babies.
So what activity has happened at a drag queen story hour that should be kept in the privacy of ones bedroom?
Well you do you. For my kids, I'd rather they go to a catholic school any day of the week than be around a bunch of perv freaks dressed in women's clothes. But I guess I'm just intolerant.
I didn't say it was a pedophile organization. Interesting you would reach that conclusion. meanwhile, try comparing the number of children who have been abused by the Catholic Church (and the lengths the RCC went to to protect the abusers) to the number of children who have been abused by drag queens. If you were honest, you'd at least try to look. Why do the facts terrify you so? I'm sorry, but no one who actually cares about children would attack drag queens and let the RCC go off scot free. For those who do that hypocritical ****, they don't actually care about the kids. They only care about their social agenda. The children are only a tool to be used for them.
And I didn't say that you said that. I was responding to someone else who explicitly said that. Oh yeah, it's interesting that I'd reach that conclusion. This qualifies for disingenuous statement of the day. The RCC didn't abuse anyone and I'm quite certain they don't teach that it's okay to do so. I do think the sick preists and anyone who covered up any crimes should rot in prison. That said, I would still rather my kids go to a catholic mass rather then have them around men that get their rocks off by dressing like women.
It's pretty easy to to excuse the RCC and demonize drag queens when you are completely unwilling to tell the truth about either. Funny how that works.