Dodgers disinvite LGBTQIA+ group from Pride Night

The topic is about an LGBT charity being removed due to the objections of the church — the church is part of the topic, the same church that caries pedophile insurance and has been involved in a massive child rape scandal.

A white flag was already waived because you didn’t like where staying on topic was taking us, want to go for a third time?

But you want to protect the children

 

I think it's funny how you just pull things out of the nether regions and act like you have done something.

I didn't see any official objection from a church. Where did you see this?


Yes let's please go for a third time so you can continue making up straw man and act like I'm somehow against them....

That's really effective debate technique you have there

 

Catholic organizations, what religion do you believe they belong to? Is it the same one that keeps having child rape scandals or a different one?

I am not the one refusing to condemn these groups and wanting actual punishment against them for their misdeeds. But we all have our faults I guess.

 

Please fix the quote function so no one gets my words mixed up with yours

 

Oh I doubt anyone here is that stupid

I see there are more questions that will go unanswered. If I was that embarrassed of my positions I would revise them.

 

Or you could simply learn to use the quote function properly and make your questions clear for the reader.

Would you care to elaborate on what you mean by saying that I doubt anyone hear is that stupid?

If you can properly Master the quote function that might go a long way to alleviate that sort of thing.

Do you care to prove your claim that the church had some objection to this baseball event?

 

Your post speaks for itself. Leave it at that.

 

Well here you go again. The Catholic Church certainly has a bad track record here, but calling them a pedophile organization is simply hyperbole if not extreme hyperbole.

It seems pretty obvious to me that "Sisters of perpetual Endulgence" was a name chosen to mock Catholics and therefore, to many people is offensive. I am not a Catholic, but I find the name offensive.

 

And the topic being, "How much NO child raping is going on at Drag Queen shows?"

 

What would you call an organization that has had to pay out over 3 BILLION in damages (just in the US alone) to victims of sexual abuse they suffered as children?

Any organization spending BILLIONS on something can, IMHO, be called an organization of that "something"

 

You do understand the Catholic Church is just an institution of human beings that can be just as far from God as any "drag queen show". The whole emphasis of "drag queens" is to confuse children as to who they are and why they were created. It prepares them to accept the reality of human nature as law including rape as a consequence of that fact. Jesus had some very powerful things to say about those who would trifle with those young ones.

 

The whole emphasis of Drag Shows is to teach children to be accepting of those who are different.

Tell me why your interpretation is correct and mine is wrong.

 

All Hail Homos!

 

Because children should not be taught to acc ept deviance.

 

Then who was the "they" in your statement?

[/QUOTE]Glad to see you oppose what Texas legislators are doing.

 

Yes unfortunately more and more of our future generations are not being raised in a nuclear family and that is sad and should not be encouraged and promoted. Another reason we should be having heterosexual pride night to teach kids it's OK to be straight instead of engaging in deviant lifestyles.

 

It wasn't the Church that was at fault but a secret homosexual cabal in the Church called The Lavender Mafia.

 

What would I call them? I would call them a church. They are worldwide organization with over 1 Billion people. So with respect to scale, what are you comparing them to? They certainly don't have a mission to promote sexually deviant behavior like say the modern day Democrat party. BTW, your President is a Catholic. Any thoughts on that?

 

Didn't know that.

 

I'll give you a parallel. Men wearing blackface is considered disparaging to black folks. Men dressed as women is equally disparaging to women. Do you believe there is such thing as right and wrong? We used to call a sincere desire to be the opposite sex as gender dysphoria. It is a mental illness. Now you want to ascribe it as normal and to be embraced. Now I do believe there are those that are insincere drags who portray themselves as women just to detract how they were created. In rebellion to the family structure. Either way, it is nothing to be glorified as many would.

 

And you get to decide what is "deviant"?

What is your criteria?

 

Really, you get to be the one to judge what is, or is not, disparaging to women?

We never called the sincere desire to be the opposite sex "gender dysphoria", learn what the term means before you start throwing it around.

 

Always with the "secret cabals"

Please inform us when one of your "secret cabals" is actually verified.


BTW, the "Lavender Mafia" comes from a book by John Barleykorn (tell me that isn't a pseudonym) subtitled "A FICTIONAL account of true corruption in the Catholic Church" available on Amazon.

https://www.amazon.com/Lavender-Mafia-fictional-corruption-Catholic-ebook/dp/B0848TCNMJ

 

I doubt that very much.