Educated vs "Non-Educated"

They do better in all objective measurements. Public schools classes are limited by the slowest students in the class. Home schools can tailor their curriculum to the individual student. Additionally they get individual instruction.

 

Lefty touts their Academic Privilege.

Conservatives promote right vs. wrong.

 

Only if they are in the majority who home school for the right reason. Many of these kids are bright to begin with, and parents feel the public schools are in general slowed down and are not student centered for readiness.

we all know many home school kids. They aren’t average and their parents are motivated to get more not less education. That’s not the people we’ve been listening to here and it’s a zoo if every one does it. At one time we didn't have public education. We were a third world country.

 

This surprises you?
There are only 100% in the population. When 51% of blacks think he did better vs. 20% of whites the difference has to come from somewhere.

I gave you the only one I had.

Young ones.




You know, before I researched this I would have agreed with you. Now I’m not so sure. Pew published both sets of numbers. They didn’t correct CNN’s. Actual random sampling is hard to beat. Professional pollees certainly disturb me. It’s all very interesting. I suppose I shouldn’t think about it, analyze it, and research it so much. I should probably just swallow whatever the media reports. After all, they are the experts.[/QUOTE]

 

I know very little about the reasons. . On average they do better than public schooled students.

 

Exactly......now make everyone home #chooled and the average to below and even the bright without parental involvement, suffer. It’s no different then magnet schools and some private schools that only cater to college bound kids, or other single track. These are student driven curriculums..

 

I am not advocating home schooling. It is not right for all students and all parents. You denigrated home schooling. I pointed out that it generally produces better students. Let it go at that.

 

The reasons are personal. The untold story are the thousands that never appear in the stats later on because their efforts fail and their kids then go on to public school.

my only point was, it’s a select few and not for everyone....which I believe was the way the post suggested it be.

 

I generally agree with you.. I denigrate home schooling for everyone. It would make us a third world country. You need to look at the post originally responded to. Regardless, I’m telling you now how and Why I responded as I did.

 

Nope. The relevant statistic I’m referring to is those who think Obama tried to improve relations and failed. This category is not a catch all. It’s specific and shows more minorities believe he tried and failed than whites. Nice try spinning it though.

I appreciate your dialogue. You may be right. I wish others would offer opinions as well, perhaps nobody cares.

I hope your right, but I don’t see how they can escape the poison our generation has concocted.

 

You have an interesting way of taking data out of context.
To me this chart

Says blacks think Obama was more successful at improving race relations than whites.

 

"College educated" versus "non-college educated" is not a valid measure of intelligence in people.

 

That is a true statement. As is mine. The graph depicts both points. As I said, all information interests me, not just the information we are told matters.

 

And it doesn't bother you that the chart has a title?

 

No. I’m not bothered by the title. I’m not bothered by the fact someone thought it important enough to ask the question I’m referencing in a poll, compile the data, and graphically represent it for public consumption either. If articles, data compilations, and studies can and should be limited to one line titles, why aren’t they? What’s the point of printing anything else? This, I believe, is one of the most baffling questions I’ve been asked.

 

Well certainly if you were in politics, without the detail you couldn't tell if you were doing better or worse.

 

Its obvious you never drove a mustang or F150, or had a Chevy dually or Ram pickup truck I had all four

The F150 is built on a mustang chassis, it handles like a Porsche


And I had a Porsche 911 in the 1980s

 

Ah. So unless we are “in politics” we ought to just read headlines and titles and not think about the raw data ourselves? Nah, doesn’t work for me. I’m interested in all information, not just information someone else deems important enough to put in a title or heading. Especially information someone went to the trouble to poll about.

 

Maybe we are not communicating.

Which is better 3 or 4?

 

It’s a difi

you said “is”.
Mustangs don’t have a full frame. To say anF150 and Mustangs share a chassis, is hilarious. This is a comedy routine ?
Well no, but I can handle an excavator, dozer or tractor pretty well. I’m not into ***** cars and trucks. They’re just tools.

 

Neither.

 

I’m not familiar with that term.

 

4.

 

Wrong.

 

Evidence?