Evidence of the Parting of the Red Sea.

Then ignore me.

 

How exactly do the writers of that article know the path that Moses took? The Bible doesn't have coordinates in it.

 

Why would I do that?

I actually care about truth and facts. If you are peddling false ones, then I'm going to counter you.

 

Watch the video.

- - - Updated - - -

LOL. Good luck.

 

[video]https://youtu.be/d90NM9tgDQE[/video]

Ron Wyatt never went to Saudi Arabia.. This is that same old hoax.

 

lol, yeah that's proof of something alright :0;

proof some people will believe anything if it fits their preconceived beliefs

so guess this proves the Jewish, Christian and Muslims religions are all true

.

 

The video assumes the result and then cherry picks evidence to support it.

Thousands of ships have wrecked in the Red Sea over the centuries. Why couldn't that debris have come from any of a number of them?

 

Ron Wyatt was a liar. SCUBA divers only dive to 130 feet. The Gulf of Aqaba is 5,000 feet deep. The claim is the con job of a chisler.

 

Well, it proves the bible is true.

- - - Updated - - -

Watch the video.

 

If I present evidence that contradicts the Bible, will that prove it false or will you just dismiss it by saying "well God can do the impossible so your evidence can be ignored".

 

They didn't cross at that depth. Watch the video.

- - - Updated - - -

Go for it.

 

Again, the video is not good science. It assumes the only place debris on the bottom of the Red Sea can possibly come from is the parting.

 

During his first visit to Nuweiba in 1978, Wyatt, he found a large column lying on the beach that looked like an ancient artifact. Later he found that it had been set up by Egyptian authorities in concrete for display. He believed it to be a marker set up by King Solomon to note the crossing of the Red Sea.

It was on that same trip in 1978 that Wyatt found what he said were the remains of chariots and chariot wheels at the bottom of the sea. They were heavily covered with coral. Wyatt claimed to have retrieved one of the wheels and said an Egyptian authority declared that it was from the 18th dynasty of Ancient Egypt, but nobody seems to know where that chariot wheel is is now located.

Regarding the human bones found at the site, TruthOrFiction.com talked with Aaron Sen, one of those who has traveled to Nuweiba and who found the bones. He said the bones were authenticated as human at Stockholm University are are in the possession of professor Lennart Moller who was at Stockholm University in the late 1990s.

It was also discovered that there seems to be an underwater “bridge” of sea bed that is shallower than the depths on either side of it and that crosses from one side of the sea to the other. Wyatt said that could have been where the waters parted and made the way for the Hebrews to cross.

Wyatt’s focus on Nuweiba and his claims of finding chariot remains on the floor of the sea have brought other adventurers to the site but even Wyatt’s supporters urge caution about their enthusiastic findings. Richard Rives, the president of Wyatt Archeological Research in Tennessee, told journalist Joe Kovacs, “All kinds of people are finding coral and calling it chariot parts.” Wyatt’s wife, Mary Nell, told Kovacs the same. She went diving with Wyatt at the Red Sea site and said that at first she thought everything was a chariot wheel.

The bottom line is that at this point all that seems to exist to support the claims of chariot parts on the bottom of the red sea are pictures, most of which are of coral formations. No documented artifacts have been retrieved and preserved from the site and now the Egyptian government prohibits bringing any findings to the surface to the questions may remain for a long time to come.

updated 02/3308

https://www.truthorfiction.com/chariot-wheels/

Ron Wyatt was a fraud. He found Noahs Ark, but it sank before anyone else could see it. He found the tablets with the 10 commandments, but unfortunately the commandment about adultery had worn away. Not forgetting the Ark of the Covenant hidden in a hillside somewhere which he couldn't get out.

There is no evidence for a Red Sea crossing of the Biblical story, and the Cross Sea Ferry was out of action at the time. Oil hadn't yet been discovered.

 

You didn't answer my question. Would you accept a disproval of the Bible or would you just dismiss any such evidence?

 

I believe the bible account and these findings back it up.

 

The topography of the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aqaba has been mapped for decades.. There is no landbridge.. Wyatt was simply a liar and con artist.

 

I don't believe you can disprove the bible. Go for it.

 

No, all they have is a picture of circular corals and claim they are wheels. Yet if these pictures really came from people who found chariot wheels, they would have taken them up and removed the coral, to get pictures of the actual wheels. And no, just because there are chariot wheels at the bottom of the ocean doesn't mean they were involved in a supernatural event

 

Watch the video.

 

IF I presented evidence that did, would you accept the Bible as disproven or would you dismiss the evidence by saying "My god can do the impossible"?

Third time.

 

I have been there.

Wyatt claimed he was using a Walmart Fishfinder.

 

I said to go for it.

 

these kind of quack "science" stories remind me of holocaust revisionist tactics. When faith trumps overwhelming evidence and facts there can be no discussion.

You can't argue with stupid, crazy or blind faith.

 

Watch the video.

 

You still haven't answered the question. Why can't you do so? It's a simple yes/no.

- - - Updated - - -

Is this how you are going to respond every time someone presents counter evidence? Just dig in your heels and refuse to acknowledge that your evidence is garbage?