Ex-IRS whistleblower says middle class targeted under inflation bill

So what city and state are you in? Or any city or your favorite city, least favorite city, etc. If you do that, I can give you the max GS 15 pay scale for that location. That would be GS 15, step 10.

The horizontal is the length of time at that pay scale. Steps one through three or yearly, steps 4 through 7 are every two years, and step 8 through 10 are every three years, if you stayed at GS 15 the whole time.

The other thing is that IRS jobs range from pay scales of GS 4 to GS 15. GS 15 are specialized Internal Revenue Agents who may be at the HIll on the House Ways and Means Committee or subject matter experts of a particular tax discipline. Most Revenue Agents who start out are GS 7 with full regular employment at GS 12. Customer Service Reps are GS 5 through 8. And so forth.

 

https://nypost.com › 2022 › 07 › 25 › biden-plays-orwell

 

Yes it shows those parts that they use to determine a recession, it used those definitions under the Orange Stain, like it says, 2019

 

Can anyone (other than @JonK22 ) tell me what Trump has to do with the subject of this thread?

 

And it will be a living wage comparable to the local economy, right?

 

They should probably sue NBER, if they feel that strongly about it right? LMAOROG

 

LMAO One lil date and down the tubes it went

How'd you put it again

Thanks for playing

 

Damn, you're struggling for relevance now awwwwwww!

 

You're going to hurt my feelings

If YOU make a posit., they changed it to protect Biden, I just showed you it was the same definition under Diaper Don in 2019. Comprehension issues?

 

Well coaching and example has much to do with that I'd think!!

 

Yes the date on their website, 2019, shows their definition was pre Biden, the guy who got 7+ million more votes than the Orange Stain

 

Take a breath

 

Then pick another LIKE I SHOWED YOU

3,450,000,000 Results

 

"ButterBalls said:
Did they or didn't they do just that last month?"

Your previous assertion. Now since I showed you that your assertion they changed it for Biden, was wrong, you'll go to your next talking point?

Bravo

 

Did they or didn't they re-define the parameters as to what constitutes recession?

Streamed live on Jul 27, 2022

 

Replacing retirees/resignations is not "already being funded" - that's precisely the problem, and has been for decades. And that's why replacing them is a key component of the 87,000 recruitment plan.

 

Not all metro areas in the US have a locality pay adjustment. All I am asking for is a major city that you want me to look up for a GS 15 maximum pay. I am just letting you decided which major city and I will provide the maximum pay, which may or may not include a locality adjustment.

 

NO, NBER, the people who say when a recession is, and the parameters of it, haven't changed. Like I showed you a link from 2019, when the Orange Stain was in office

 

So are we in a recession? All the indicators used for the last 10 years say we are! So are you calling old brain bleeder and crew liars, because they say we aren't

 

You need not ask to link examples.. The point is, IRS and all grubmint employee's have received pay increases thought the years

This is the nonsense I'm faced with

Now there is some of that top shelf leftwing arithmatricks So we are to believe replacements are going to be paid MUCH more than those resigning and those retiring. You really expect me to take that sort of hogwash seriously

 

So when they leave the funding used to pay them vanishes with them, OK

 

[QUOTE="ButterBalls, post: 1073678702, member: 73108"]So are we in a recession? All the indicators used for the last 10 years say we are! So are you calling old brain bleeder and crew liars, because they say we aren't [/QUOTE]

Nope. The people, who decide, again, said nope

NBER

Business Cycle
https://www.nber.org/research/business-cycle-dating

 

You could apply some common sense. If the plan were to audit those earning more than $400K then doubling the size of the IRS wouldn't be necessary. The current size would be adequate. I see a lot of reports that the incomes of those people all added up aren't close to enough to meet the goals of the legislation. What is required is auditing the massive general poplulation. That is actually where most of the income is. 2+2=4.

 

Care to point to ANYTHING credible that backs up your assertion?

Dec. 11, 2018

How the IRS Was Gutted
An eight-year campaign to slash the agency’s budget has left it understaffed, hamstrung and operating with archaic equipment. The result: billions less to fund the government. That’s good news for corporations and the wealthy.
https://www.propublica.org/article/how-the-irs-was-gutted

New OMB-CEA Report: Billionaires Pay an Average Federal Individual Income Tax Rate of Just 8.2%
https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/brie...deral-individual-income-tax-rate-of-just-8-2/

For the first time in history, U.S. billionaires paid a lower tax rate than the working class last year

It finds that in 2018, the average effective tax rate paid by the richest 400 families in the country was 23 percent, a full percentage point lower than the 24.2 percent rate paid by the bottom half of American households.


In 1980, by contrast, the 400 richest had an effective tax rate of 47 percent. In 1960, that rate was as high as 56 percent.

The effective tax rate paid by the bottom 50 percent, by contrast, has changed little over time.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/busi...-lower-tax-rate-than-working-class-last-year/

 

Nope. The people, who decide, again, said nope

NBER

Business Cycle
https://www.nber.org/research/business-cycle-dating[/QUOTE]

LMAO So where is 2021-22

That was a cheesy try, and laughable Here this pertains to you

Is the US in a recession? It depends on who you ask | The Hill