Fact Check Devastates Trump As His First Ad Averages 1 Lie Every 4 Seconds

You're the one that mentioned "rigging"...........

I believe you are referring to the wrong one of several that Trump has launched.........

AND even with that one must prove the what and how "rigging" is occurring........

 

WE are not talking about Obama care..........

And given that.......

You need to prove their rating is false.......

You have yet to do so.......

And as far as you're other assertions as to the what and how Politifacts reaches its conclusions'...........

You have to read how they did so..........which is provided below their findings......

I can see you have never read that part of the PolitiFact's findings

- - - Updated - - -

 

While there are many groups in their list that truly are racist, their are others they accuse of racism.

https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/groups

They also hate many other individuals who are Jewish or Christian who's political beliefs they oppose.

 

I think you need to read for comprehension.........

Because it seems you have it all backwards and upside down...........

Your two sentences are diametrically opposed

 

aren't they the hacks and liars that rated the "Lie Of The Year" "True"?

And then the didn't fess up when they rated it a Lie, that they had previously rated it true? It's one thing to be wrong, that can happen to anyone. It's quite another to then attempt to hide, that speaks to their character. And why would anyone in their right mind give two cents about what a website like that claims is true or false?

I'm amazed that you continue to cite them after they so openly demonstrated their complete lack of integrity.

But I really like the Trump Ad. Very effective.

- - - Updated - - -

aren't they the hacks and liars that rated the "Lie Of The Year" "True"?

And then the didn't fess up when they rated it a Lie, that they had previously rated it true? It's one thing to be wrong, that can happen to anyone. It's quite another to then attempt to hide, that speaks to their character. And why would anyone in their right mind give two cents about what a website like that claims is true or false?

I'm amazed that you continue to cite them after they so openly demonstrated their complete lack of integrity.

But I really like the Trump Ad. Very effective.

 

Do you really rely upon such garbage for your facts? No wonder liberals are so misinformed, and so mislead; they have no cognitive ability of their own.

 

SO WHAT............

Plus..... WHERE THE BEEF?

But to answer your question..........

I have no idea......

But I seem to recall several site who do "The lie of the year"..........

BTW

SAYS YOU.........

"I'm amazed that you continue to cite them after they so openly demonstrated their complete lack of integrity.

But I really like the Trump Ad. Very effective."

For you I'm sure............

The ad is called "firming up the base".....

As far as its appeal to others........

You surely should wait for the polls before you say it was effective.........

IMHO..........I doubt it will move the dial not much more than a twit

 

Prove it garbage friend........Or clap your trap.............

 

They rate the lie of the year as true, and then try to hide it and you say SO WHAT?

Is this like Hillary's "WHAT DIFFERENCE AT THIS POINT DOES IT MAKE!"?

And you are starting to show signs of anger and frustration. Looking at pictures of cute baby animals can be very calming:

 

Dude, this is your quote from the OP
Trump’s ad begins with a favorite lie of the GOP nominee that the system is rigged against Americans. PolitiFact has rated this a pants on fire lie, “While there are isolated examples of bought local elections, experts say it cannot be replicated on a national scale. While it is possible to tamper with electronic voting machines, there is no evidence deliberate malfeasance has altered any election.”…….

It's talking about the system being rigged (highlighted for your reading pleasure) and the factchecking is about election fraud... Either this pseudo-factchecking is full of it or you are (if you misquoted them). Certainly not Trump, the idea that the ruling class can convince working americans that the system is not rigged against them and in favor of this ruling class is truly funny.

Edit: I looked into this and it's your pants. The fact checker was not talking about the ad and you put their quote into a false, totally unrelated content of the first Trump's ad. Shame on you and get new pants.

 

Y'all keep voting to make your vote not count.Go 'on head.
Taking guns is where the line gonna get drawn.
I already got all dat dere I need.
Too bad if Hillary gets elected I can't go out and buy a brick of .22 on the way to the range on Saturday morning.
Obama already stifled that.
If Hillary gets elected,more of the same. No .22 bricks.
No .22 bricks makes me mad.They were available for so long,until Obama weaponized the Federal Beauroucracies.
All my life until Obama.Grrrr
I still have 'nuff,but dadgum!

 

The PolitiFacts article is an absurd collection of lies on their part. Just a Democrat hack blog and nothing else. I already pointed out the lies of the article - blatant and obviously lies.

 

The irony is obvious since Hillary Clinton continually claims the system is rigged for the rich against the poor. OBVIOUSLY that is just more Hillary Clinton lies, huh? So PolitiFact just declared that actually Hillary Clinton is a big liar. No surprise there.

 

Hillary supporters/employees are the only ones who care

 

And what are you trying to say?

Just because you believe their finding of the lie of the year you consider wrong/untruthful/distortion/lie...........

It now makes everything they publish/report is "a lie/distortion/not to be trusted............

Now you must admit if that is want you mean..........

It is really silly to think that so...........

You should know better.......

 

The fact they made an error just means they are human.
The fact that they were not forthright about it goes to their honesty and integrity.
How desperate do you have to be to source a bunch of obvious hacks like that?

They destroyed their reputation, I simply note that they destroyed their reputation and deep sixed their credibility.

 

On any objective measure when compared to Trump she is a paragon of honesty. Which is admittedly a very low bar.

 

Well then you are talkin about the wrong ad..........

Trump has 3 different ads running that I know of............

The ad I was speaking to has nothing to do with "rigging"........

So what every you say/claim is misapplied

 

Easy to say, but can you prove so...........

Or is what some one else told you or told you to say.............?

I'll away your proof to what you say is so...............

 

One lie every four second - Trump is utterly pathetic.

 

More so then that my friend...........

Independent college educated white folks check out all "political" claims and rely upon PolitiFact as one of their sources........ Check the internals of the polls if you need proof

What then is your problem.........?

 

So the obvious issue is whch system is Trump Referring to, the electoral system or the economc system. Since Trump has already claimed that the election is rigged it might be logical to assume that is the system he is talking about. If it is the economic system of course it is rigged and his economic plan will rig it even further with his tax cuts for the rich and eliminating the inheritance tax which currently only taxes the very wealthy.

 

Facts, he don't need no stinking facts. He A Republican..

 

So says you..........

Thanks for sharing your opinion...........

 

Dude, nice try, do you believe what you wrote? I doubt it LOL Trump's been talking about the system (political and economic) being rigged against the working people and in favor of the ruling elites since the first day of his presidential run. The first ad this OP is about does not mention anything election related.

Anyway, your defense of fact checkers is baseless because fact checkers have nothing to do with this nonsense. The OP simply lied, he took an unrelated fact checking, applied it to Trump's first ad to make an impression that the ad is full of lies. It isn't, the OP is.