GOP's 20-Week abortion bans are devastating for women like me....

So force is ok with Chemo? What happened to it being a womens body? Your spin is all over the place its like you dont even know what you are typing

Btw there WAS FORCED sterliziations in this country by the same movement YOU support.

 

What movement is that??? And if you bring up all the usual "taken out of context quotes by Sanger used by Anti-Choicers to prove nothing" then don't waste your time.


Oh, I'm sorry you can't comprehend what I wrote which was ""A 17 year old and chemo has nothing to do with abortion unless she was forced by Republicans to give birth while going through chemo (which they would want to do)."""

This is about abortion and you have no knowledge of how I feel about the 17 year old and chemo.


Anything else you want to segue into to try to disguise your wish to control women??

 

The Eugenics movement didnt start nor end with Sanger. Its really sad you thought it did. You discussed forced and a womens body. I gave you another example. You seem upset by that i wonder why.

If you ONLY want to talk about abortion on this forum then by all means come clean and say so.

Your last statement is utter bull(*)(*)(*)(*). No matter how many times you repeat it stays utter bull(*)(*)(*)(*).

 

Yes, the legal cut off is 23 weeks. Fine by me, since not all fetuses are exactly the same at exactly the same week.

AND most abortions are done before that....so don't get in a tizzy...

 

Considering your posts can't refute any of my posts I'd say they were pretty hollow.

And it isn't hollow that abortion is legal

Now, do you have anything to post on the topic or just want to quibble? ....you'll have to quibble by yourself....or go to the abortion forum and really get trounced

 

<stands>

 

Never knew one needed a uterus to do the right thing

 

Actually, (pay attention now) Republicans hate paying able bodied lazy mother(*)(*)(*)(*)ers who are on welfare. Republicans hate paying young ignorant sluts to download baby after baby and lose the fathers. Republicans actually have some compassion for the poor kids who are shackled to the welfare plantation in the inner cities that the DEMOCRATS CREATED. Republicans have a problem with children on welfare having to dodge drive by shootings because their slut mothers are too (*)(*)(*)(*)ing lazy to either get a (*)(*)(*)(*)ing job, quit making more babies or just do her (*)(*)(*)(*)ing job as a mother.

 

Big load of misogynist horsepuckey.

 

There is no one to blame for natural occurances obviously, it's not someones handiwork and it's not done for convenience.

How does it sit with your moral highground, to be part of a society that intentionally kills a million plus of it's own people yearly.

Let me guess, against the death penalty?

 

My aunt & uncle had a mongoloid child that they cared for until they died. What does the child do when his parents die, go live with a Republican?

 

Too bad that sentiment doesn't extend to your tax and welfare policies, eh?

 

Good thing some Repub Congresswomen had a backbone and voted it down.......REPUBLICAN women OOOH, how that must hurt the Anti-Choicers ...

 

Uneducated knuckleheads constantly vomit that out whenever they hear an uncomfortable truth.

 

Oh, I agree as with the post above.

Did you have anything to say on the topic or just prefer to "vomit" some more?

 

I am pro-choice, I believe you should decide to bring a baby into this world... not the gov decide for you.....

yes I am against the government killing unarmed people via the death penalty, death is a get out of punishment free card... your not... means your not pro-life... your ANTI_CHOICE


.

 

I can't even read this for all the (*)'s .....are you capable of posting without the potty mouth?

- - - Updated - - -

Easy to be anti choice when you know YOUR body will never suffer the trauma of gestation and childbirth, isn't it?

 

Mother Jones has won NUMEROUS prestigious awards, including:

"Mother Jones, the source for the original post, has been nominated for the industry's highest honor&#8213;the National Magazine Award for General Excellence&#8213;eight times in the magazine's history, and has won three times. MoJo has also garnered a slew of other awards for its reporting, illustration, and photography... " (see link)

http://www.motherjones.com/media/2013/06/mother-jones-awards

Seems you aren't the best judge of news sources.

 

After reading so much of the emotionally laden claptrap from the pro-lifer manual 101 that has been put on display here it must be said that pro-lifers really do not have any logically arguments against abortion what so ever.

The hypocrisy they post about welfare, eugenics, etc etc must be spewed from behind blinkers, especially when it is their policies that add to the number of teenage pregnancies and abortions, and what every single one of them ignores are the things they fight so hard to maintain .. that every person has the right to consent, that no person can use another persons body without consent and that every person has the right to defend themselves against non-consented intrusion upon their body.

It simply does not matter if the fetus is handicapped or not, it is 100% irrelevant to the abortion issue.

As to the question of when an elective abortion should not be allowed the simple answer is there should be no restrictions what so ever, that would be the legal and constitutional correct decision, not the hotch-podge that is Roe .

as to the person who maintains that there are plenty of adoptive parents waiting for children I ask why are there around 102,000 children waiting for adoption each year, why are there around 20,000 children each year who 'age out' of adoption, and yet pro-lifers want to add another 10% into the mix EVERY YEAR - 10% is the average number of children born who go into care and adoption.

Every single argument put forward by pro-lifers I have seen and every single one of them is based upon one single ideology, that because of their wants the state should be able to control what a woman does concerning her body .. and they have the gall to accuse pro-choicers of being like Nazi's or slave owners .. how ironic.

 

It isn't.

 

If that is really a concern for the cons, they can help reduce unwanted pregnancies by promoting comprehensive sex education and easily available birth control for the poor.