Heavily armed Antifa militants 'stand guard' outside Texas 'kid friendly' drag show

lol

 

Hey, if you want to argue that you support the 2A of Antifa, then go for it! I salute the effort!

Quote me saying or supporting any such thing.

 

Wrong. We have videos, including drone footage of the incident. Lots of videos.

https://heavy.com/news/joseph-rosenbaum/

 

It's in ****ing glowing neon.

It's not an oversight...it's an on purpose

 

I support Antifa's 2A rights.

 

I support their 2A rights, fully.

 

good... as we all should

I may not think it's smart to carry an ar-47 at crowded public events, but they have a right to do it

 

you're the one that needs to let it go, both OJ and Kyle were found not guilty, just the facts folks

 

The fact that it was inappropriate for the event was the oversight.

 

And then OJ wrote a book describing how he committed the murder.
OJ perjured himself, his counsel suborned it, the prosecution allowed it because they are feckless losers, and by OJ's counsel's own estimation of the facts if the glove fit it must be his client.

These are also, just the facts.

Nuance is a thing dude.

 

You can't overlook that. Its a glowing neon sign on center ****ing stage.
That's intentional.

Or do you believe every perv who just claims they were taking a piss when they expose themselves?

 

Demonstrably false. We literally saw the story from more angles and with better footage, rewindable replayable footage, than any witness could otherwise provide.
Pedo LITERALLY was asking for it.

Yes they certainly have a right to peaceably assemble and to carry arms while doing so.

 

The professional victims are the ones who needs safe spaces because someone used the wrong pro noun. The left is offended by almost everything, even the national anthem and our flag offends them. Do you want me to make of list of the things libs are offended by?

 

Look. I agree that the sign was inappropriate given the intention of the event. I’m just not convinced that the intention was to introduce children to something inappropriate (in this case; the sign).

People make mistakes. Deciding the sign was appropriate for the event is one of them in this case. Children have been exposed to adult innuendo for ages and have been fine (ever watch Looney Tunes?). These kids will be fine.

 

And the right is identical in that regard . . . and the Trump-supporting right is far, far worse.

 

How quickly they forget.

 

As of late, they’ve been very offended by the idea that no one is above the law.

 

A real fun thing to learn is that one does not need testimony from a spooky ghost or a confession written ahead of death to know.

When you get in a violent altercation with a person offering you no harm (gun slung, "hey friendly friendly friendly" said, fleeing when that's not legally required.) the same person who earlier on tape you had attempted to get in a violent altercation with (chanting "shoot me ni**a shoot me ni**a SHOOT ME NI**A" and having to be physically restrained) one can fairly say they understand your motive.

 

Hey you know what? Its 2 full years since ole jojo tried to touch a minor. That's progress isn't it?

 

That seems to be the nature of the entire event. That's like saying strippers are innappropriate for strip shows.

 

I thank you for the very basic, minimum admission, so I don't have to keep beating you over the head with it.

I think you're misconstruing: The sign was just part of the decor and the atmosphere. Merely the venue. The intention was to introduce children to adult sex activities (like crossdressing, erotic dancing, being paid for erotic activities, exhibitionism etc). The venue they chose for decor and atmosphere happened to itself be inappropriate, and obviously, blatantly, unforgettably so. I doubt if the venue was unavailable they would be unable to find another. I don't think the intent was to expose them to the venue, but rather to the performers and performances IN the venue.
IE Exposing them to the venue was just gravy, its was really about getting them to dance erotically and get paid for it, and to introduce those children who merely watched to the idea of watching someone their age dance erotically and get paid for it.

 

That’s a false equivalency.

 

Indeed: The venue is appropriate for adults. The venue is not appropriate for children. The activity is appropriate (though a bit weird for my taste) for adults. The activity is not appropriate for children.

 

Not really no. That's example as to the very nature of these types of events.

 

Let’s discuss what you find inappropriate here. Let’s really break it down.

We’ve already addressed the sign.
Let’s talk about the “adult sex activities.”

• Cross dressing: What is sexual about a male wearing clothes designated by society as being for women?
• Erotic dancing: What does erotic dancing consist of? Can the same be said of cheerleaders at a professional sports event? Are children harmed for being in attendance?
• Being paid: Does a street performer or busker being paid by passersby constitute a sex activity?
  
• Exhibitionism: They weren’t showing their genitals to anyone, so are we talking about behavior meant to attract attention? Nothing inherently sexual there.
  
• The Venue: There is nothing inherently wrong with a child being in a space where the primary intent is to serve as a bar. Alcohol is served in restaurants where children are permitted. The promoted atmosphere is a better determiner of whether the space is an issue.

You’re making the same false claim that gays are groomers and pedophiles. The intent behind this claim is disturbing to be honest.