Hillary takes a few spills in India...then tries to hide the evidence

And unbelievably they would still vote for her over Trump if they had to do it again. Should be grounds for a mental check.

 

At least she wouldn’t play golf all the time at your expense . She seems to breathe OK, not like trump who has the taking deep breath’s all the time. It could be his fat gut... Oh wait I forgot he’s the healthiest president ever to take office. And I’m sure you believe him

 

Most of the country would because we have a narcissist who is a pathological liar, liar, you hate, republicans are bigots, and A childish twitter bully in the White House. Your kinda guy..the one he said would defend him no matter what

 

No they wouldn't . Trump train is rolling

 

You don't really have a valid reply and we know what that means.

Im sorry your gal lost, but the leader of America is too important to trust to a medically brittle (let alone corrupt) politician.

Not on America's watch, was Hillary going to be elected.

America said no!

 

Its the lefty way.

 

But having a pathological lying narcissist who has no impulse control is your answer...oh did trump knows his base.

 

Said the child mid tantrum. Not a word of substance, just one pejorative after another.

 

I guess you don’t see the humor...you’re still whining about Hillary and throwing tantrums.

 

Why would she even try? It’s pretty obvious that there is something wrong and nobody would buy it.

 

Hillary is tripping-in every sense of the word.

 

Hillary Clinton, Drunk on Truthjuice: A Very Big Minority of the US Population Is Sexist About Women Seeking Power
—
Tell me again, NeverTrumpers, that we would have been better off with this lunatic obsessive and vindictive drunk in power.

During a sit-down in Australia, Hillary Clinton reflected on what may have been responsible for her defeat in the 2016 election.

"There is still a very large proportion of the population that is uneasy with women in positions of leadership," Clinton said, "and so the easiest way to kind of avoid having to look at someone on her merits is to dismiss her on her looks."​

The easiest way is actually to point out that such a candidate is a serial liar, perjurer, and grifter who created an "entirely new model of 'charity'" which chiefly consisted of bundling million+ donations with half-million plus personal speaking fees.

Gillard had told Clinton that she was referred to as a "witch" and mentioned how Clinton faced "lock her up" chants during the campaign.​

Neither of those are about your looks. "Lock her up" was said because you're an unapprehended serial criminal.

"Witch" does not reference your looks, because witches, in the popular conception, are skinny to the point of gauntness, not fat as a beertruck, like you are.

Also, witches can fly. You can barely elevate yourself on a staircase with two bodyguards/medial support staff helping to carry half of your weight.

So "witch" refers to your character, Chubs.

"There is this fear, there is this anger, even rage about women seeking power, women exercising power and people fall back on these attacks like you’re a witch or you should go to prison," Clinton continued. "It's not a majority, thank goodness, it's not, but it's a very vocal minority at least in my country. And sometimes these tropes are very much part of the press coverage.
​

Yes, I'm sure CNN called you ugly and fat routinely.

http://ace.mu.nu/archives/375267.php

 

So now she's in Australia blaming sexists (meaning people who didn't vote for her).

 

If Hillary falls in Australia, will she fall clockwise or counterclockwise?

 

It’s pretty obvious that Trump is mentally ill and yet his supporters buy it. He is a pathological liar and a narcissist and look on his base denies it

 

Those are some nice talking points you’re parroting.

 

No , it's why Trump won.

 

This will end well for you.

 

Oh forgive me... A 60-year-old man who brags about grabbing ******* and brags about going into teenage girls locker rooms is just a talking point, not a reflection of his character. The president of the United States lying about things that can easily be checked like the size of his inauguration crowds, is pathological. Or do you believe he actually saw people in New Jersey celebrating 911? And narcissism is a disorder and if you believe he knows more than the generals and if you listen to him brag about himself over and over and tell how fabulous he is...then you’re as bad
And if you think his sick tweets are normal, then you are just the person trump said he loved

 

And Russian interference,, ,

 

Bumped after 2 MONTHS, just to feed your Terminal Hillary Derangement Syndrome?

It might be time to reassess your reasons for posting at PF.

After 2 MONTHS?

Oh well, Clueless Righties gonna Clueless Righty.

 

It was all my fault for clicking on the "Show ignored content" button - but I guess it has to be said by someone at some point:

There are a collection of small-minded people here on many sides of the political aisle who seek to stifle debate and discussion by attempting to use shame as a weapon. And I don't mean shaming the people involved IN the news, many of whom certainly deserve the shellacking they're getting here, but rather shaming the posters discussing it on an open forum. We've all done this at some point or another, myself included, but when it's ALL you do - *shrugs* They use this method in a cheap and vain attempt to steer the discussion away from what they don't wish discussed. "Why are we discussing this?", "Who cares?" they say. In a way, it's like a four-year old's tantrum writ large and with better grammar: Discuss what I want and not what you want. And unlike an adult who simply steers clear of discussions that are of no interest to them, they seek to poison the well with trolling and personal attacks that serve no purpose save self-inflation and ego. The above post is actually a perfect example of passing judgement on fellow posters while not actually adding to the conversation in any way, it's essentially a form of intellectual self-pleasuring. Putting others down in order to make themselves feel better about themselves, so to speak.

I see this all the time at school. Problem is that I see it from children.

The thing about people who make posts like the above is - well, this IS an open forum. No one really fears anyone here enough to say "Oh dear, well maybe I shouldn't post that - it might offend (fill-in-the-blank). When I see posts like that, I come to the opposite conclusion that they want me to come to - that what they DON'T want me to discuss is something THEY are afraid of and thus SHOULD be discussed. But the truly funny thing is that posters such as the above really well and truly do think that their opinion should be (and I mean this) feared.

Nah. I respect the mods. I respect a number of posters here on many sides of the political spectrum, including many I strongly disagree with on just about every issue out there. But someone telling me or anyone else what to post and not to post? Those people are laughable - and deep down, I suspect they all know it too. [/rant]

 

She's a Top Democrat, seems topical.


Where did you go for months after Hillary Clinton lost the Presidential election to political newcomer and current POTUS Donald J Trump?

It should be noted, Hillary Clinton still falls frequently.

This is newsworthy.

 

They are talking points sharpened against the harsh elbow-skin of Rachel Maddow...

...None Shall Pass.

 

I haven't seen anyone fall that much since Grandma had Alzheimer's.